disinvest

简明释义

英[ˌdɪsɪnˈvest]美[ˌdɪsɪnˈvest]

vi. 投资缩减；减资

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.While campaigners against fossil fuels have kept up a steady drumbeat of calls to disinvest from companies producing coal, prices and share values of producers have continued to head south.

反对化石燃料的活动人士持续不断地呼吁从煤炭生产公司撤资，同时煤炭价格和生产商的股价持续下降。

2.While campaigners against fossil fuels have kept up a steady drumbeat of calls to disinvest from companies producing coal, prices and share values of producers have continued to head south.

反对化石燃料的活动人士持续不断地呼吁从煤炭生产公司撤资，同时煤炭价格和生产商的股价持续下降。

3.Investors were worried when the firm announced it would disinvest from several high-risk projects.

当公司宣布将撤资于几个高风险项目时，投资者感到担忧。

4.The government plans to disinvest from outdated infrastructure projects.

政府计划撤资于过时的基础设施项目。

5.The company decided to disinvest from non-core businesses to focus on its main products.

该公司决定撤资于非核心业务，以专注于其主要产品。

6.In an effort to improve sustainability, the organization chose to disinvest from fossil fuel companies.

为了提高可持续性，该组织选择撤资于化石燃料公司。

7.After the scandal, many investors decided to disinvest from the corporation.

在丑闻之后，许多投资者决定撤资于该公司。

作文

In recent years, many companies and governments have begun to reconsider their investment strategies, leading to a phenomenon known as disinvest. The term disinvest refers to the process of withdrawing investments from a particular asset or sector. This can occur for various reasons, including economic downturns, ethical considerations, or shifts in market demand. For instance, a corporation may choose to disinvest from fossil fuels in response to growing environmental concerns and the push for sustainable energy sources.One of the most significant reasons for disinvesting is the increasing awareness of social responsibility among consumers and investors. As public sentiment shifts towards sustainability, companies that fail to adapt risk losing both customers and investors. For example, many educational institutions and pension funds have decided to disinvest from coal and oil companies, aligning their portfolios with values that prioritize environmental stewardship. This movement has not only affected the financial stability of these industries but has also highlighted the importance of corporate accountability.Another factor driving disinvestment is the recognition of financial risks associated with certain sectors. The rise of renewable energy technologies has made traditional energy investments less attractive. Investors are now more inclined to disinvest from industries that are likely to decline in the face of changing regulations and market preferences. This shift reflects a broader trend in which financial decisions are increasingly influenced by environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria.Moreover, disinvestment can also be a strategic decision made during periods of economic uncertainty. Companies may disinvest from underperforming assets to reallocate resources more effectively. By pulling out of less profitable ventures, businesses can focus on areas with higher growth potential. This strategy not only helps in maintaining financial health but also allows firms to innovate and adapt to new market conditions.However, disinvesting is not without its challenges. Companies must carefully consider the implications of withdrawing investments, as this can sometimes lead to backlash from stakeholders who may view such actions as abandoning commitments. Furthermore, the logistics of disinvesting can be complex, requiring thorough analysis and planning to ensure that the process does not adversely affect the company's overall performance.In conclusion, the act of disinvesting signifies a transformative shift in how organizations approach their investments. It reflects a growing recognition of the interconnectedness of financial performance and social responsibility. As more entities choose to disinvest from sectors that are misaligned with their values or that present financial risks, we may see a significant reshaping of the investment landscape. This trend not only highlights the evolving priorities of investors but also underscores the importance of sustainable practices in ensuring long-term success in a rapidly changing world.

近年来，许多公司和政府开始重新考虑他们的投资策略，这导致了一种现象，称为撤资。这个术语撤资指的是从特定资产或行业撤回投资的过程。这可能由于各种原因而发生，包括经济衰退、伦理考虑或市场需求的变化。例如，一家公司可能选择撤资于化石燃料，以响应日益增长的环境关注和对可持续能源来源的推动。撤资的一个重要原因是消费者和投资者对社会责任的日益关注。随着公众情绪向可持续发展转变，未能适应的公司面临失去客户和投资者的风险。例如，许多教育机构和养老金基金已决定撤资于煤炭和石油公司，使他们的投资组合与优先考虑环境保护的价值观保持一致。这一运动不仅影响了这些行业的财务稳定性，还突显了企业问责制的重要性。驱动撤资的另一个因素是认识到某些行业相关的金融风险。可再生能源技术的崛起使得传统能源投资变得不那么吸引人。投资者现在更倾向于撤资于那些在面对不断变化的监管和市场偏好时可能会衰退的行业。这一转变反映了一个更广泛的趋势，即金融决策越来越受到环境、社会和治理（ESG）标准的影响。此外，在经济不确定时期，撤资也可以是一个战略决策。公司可能会撤资于表现不佳的资产，以更有效地重新分配资源。通过退出利润较低的项目，企业可以专注于更具增长潜力的领域。这一战略不仅有助于维持财务健康，还使公司能够创新并适应新的市场条件。然而，撤资并非没有挑战。公司必须仔细考虑撤回投资的影响，因为这有时可能导致利益相关者的反弹，他们可能将此视为放弃承诺。此外，撤资的后勤工作可能很复杂，需要进行全面的分析和规划，以确保这一过程不会对公司的整体业绩产生不利影响。总之，撤资的行为标志着组织如何看待其投资的转变。这反映出对财务表现和社会责任之间相互联系的日益认识。随着越来越多的实体选择从与其价值观不符或存在财务风险的行业撤资，我们可能会看到投资格局的显著重塑。这一趋势不仅突显了投资者优先事项的演变，也强调了可持续实践在确保快速变化的世界中长期成功的重要性。