punishments

简明释义

英[ˈpʌnɪʃmənts]美[ˈpʌnɪʃmənts]

n. [动]惩罚（punishment 的复数）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Don't use chores as punishments or rewards, but rather as an opportunity to contribute to family life.

千万不要把家务当做惩罚或者奖励，但是可以作为为家庭做贡献的一次机会。

2.In a bid to wrestle with the serious problem of school bullying, schools should impose strict punishments upon those offenders.

为了解决严重的学校霸凌问题，学校应对那些犯事者施以严厉的惩罚。

3.Further punishments may yet be added.

除此之外，还会有进一步的惩罚措施。

4.Whereas the case cannot constitute a crime, administrative punishments shall be meted out.

不构成犯罪的，应当依法给予行政处罚。

5.What's the use of even punishing someone if they can choose their own punishments as they like?

如果一个人可以选择自己喜欢的惩罚方式，那么惩罚他们又有什么用呢？

6.Germany, however, wants binding rules and strong punishments.

然而德国则希望出台有约束力的规则和强有力的惩罚措施。

7.Article 33 The principal punishments are as follows.

第三十三条主刑的种类如下。

8.Some believe that punishments should be rehabilitative rather than punitive.

一些人认为，惩罚应该是康复性的，而不是惩罚性的。

9.The teacher explained the different types of punishments for breaking school rules.

老师解释了违反校规的不同类型的惩罚。

10.Parents often debate the best methods of punishments for misbehaving children.

父母们常常讨论对不听话孩子的最佳惩罚方法。

11.In some cultures, public punishments are still practiced as a form of deterrence.

在一些文化中，公共惩罚仍然作为一种威慑形式被实践。

12.The judge issued severe punishments for those found guilty of the crime.

法官对那些被判有罪的人施以严厉的惩罚。

作文

In today's society, the concept of punishments (惩罚) has become a topic of extensive debate. Many people believe that punishments are necessary to maintain order and discipline, while others argue that they can be counterproductive and lead to further issues. To understand the role of punishments in our lives, we must first examine their purpose and effectiveness.Historically, punishments have been used as a means to deter criminal behavior. The idea is that if individuals know there will be consequences for their actions, they will think twice before committing a crime. This deterrent effect is one of the primary justifications for the use of punishments. For example, in many countries, the threat of imprisonment serves as a warning to potential offenders. However, the effectiveness of this approach is still up for discussion.Critics of traditional punishments argue that they often fail to address the root causes of criminal behavior. Instead of rehabilitating offenders, harsh punishments can lead to a cycle of reoffending. Incarceration, for instance, may isolate individuals from society, but it does not necessarily provide them with the skills or support needed to reintegrate successfully. As a result, many former inmates find themselves returning to crime, perpetuating a cycle of punishments (惩罚) and incarceration.Furthermore, the application of punishments is not always equitable. Social and economic factors can influence how individuals are treated within the justice system. For instance, those from disadvantaged backgrounds may receive harsher punishments compared to their wealthier counterparts for similar offenses. This disparity raises questions about fairness and justice, leading many to advocate for reform in how punishments are administered.Alternative approaches to dealing with crime have emerged as a response to these criticisms. Restorative justice, for example, focuses on repairing the harm caused by criminal behavior rather than solely punishing the offender. This method encourages dialogue between victims and offenders, fostering understanding and accountability. By emphasizing healing over retribution, restorative justice aims to create a more compassionate and effective system.Moreover, educational programs and community service initiatives have gained traction as viable alternatives to traditional punishments. These approaches aim to educate offenders about the consequences of their actions and provide them with opportunities to contribute positively to society. By focusing on rehabilitation rather than punishment, these methods can break the cycle of crime and reduce recidivism rates.In conclusion, while punishments (惩罚) have long been a staple of our justice system, their effectiveness and fairness are increasingly being called into question. As society evolves, so too must our understanding of how to deal with crime. By exploring alternative methods that prioritize rehabilitation and restorative practices, we can create a more just and effective system that ultimately benefits everyone. It is essential to continue this conversation and seek solutions that address the complexities of human behavior and societal needs.

在当今社会，punishments（惩罚）的概念已成为广泛讨论的话题。许多人认为，punishments 是维持秩序和纪律所必需的，而另一些人则辩称，这些惩罚可能适得其反，并导致进一步的问题。要理解punishments 在我们生活中的作用，我们必须首先检查它们的目的和有效性。历史上，punishments 一直被用作威慑犯罪行为的一种手段。这个想法是，如果个人知道他们的行为会有后果，他们在犯罪之前会三思而后行。这种威慑效应是使用punishments 的主要理由之一。例如，在许多国家，监禁的威胁作为对潜在违法者的警告。然而，这种方法的有效性仍然值得讨论。传统的punishments 批评者认为，它们往往未能解决犯罪行为的根本原因。严厉的punishments 可能导致再犯的循环，而不是改造罪犯。例如，监禁可能会将个人与社会隔离，但它并不一定提供他们成功重新融入社会所需的技能或支持。因此，许多前囚犯发现自己重返犯罪，延续了punishments（惩罚）和监禁的循环。此外，punishments 的实施并不总是公正的。社会和经济因素可能影响个体在司法系统中的待遇。例如，来自弱势背景的人可能因类似的罪行而受到更严厉的punishments，与他们更富裕的同龄人相比。这种差异引发了关于公平和正义的问题，导致许多人倡导改革punishments 的施加方式。作为对这些批评的回应，替代处理犯罪的方法应运而生。恢复性司法，例如，侧重于修复犯罪行为造成的伤害，而不仅仅是惩罚罪犯。这种方法鼓励受害者和罪犯之间的对话，促进理解和责任感。通过强调治愈而非报复，恢复性司法旨在建立一个更具同情心和有效性的系统。此外，教育项目和社区服务倡议作为传统punishments 的可行替代方案逐渐获得关注。这些方法旨在教育罪犯了解其行为的后果，并为他们提供积极贡献社会的机会。通过关注改造而非惩罚，这些方法可以打破犯罪的循环，降低再犯率。总之，虽然punishments（惩罚）长期以来一直是我们司法系统的一个支柱，但它们的有效性和公平性正日益受到质疑。随着社会的发展，我们对如何处理犯罪的理解也必须随之演变。通过探索优先考虑改造和恢复性实践的替代方法，我们可以创建一个更公正和有效的系统，最终使每个人受益。继续进行这一对话并寻求解决方案，以解决人类行为和社会需求的复杂性是至关重要的。