Conclusive Presumption

简明释义

绝对推定

英英释义

例句

1.The court ruled that the absence of evidence led to a Conclusive Presumption 推定结论 of innocence for the defendant.

法院裁定，由于缺乏证据，导致对被告的推定结论 Conclusive Presumption为无罪。

2.In legal cases, a judge may apply a Conclusive Presumption 推定结论 that certain facts are true if they meet specific criteria.

在法律案件中，法官可能会适用一个推定结论 Conclusive Presumption，如果某些事实符合特定标准，则认为这些事实为真。

3.In tax law, there is a Conclusive Presumption 推定结论 that income reported by a taxpayer is accurate unless proven otherwise.

在税法中，有一个推定结论 Conclusive Presumption，即纳税人报告的收入是准确的，除非有证据证明相反。

4.The insurance policy includes a Conclusive Presumption 推定结论 that accidental deaths are covered without additional proof.

保险政策包括一个推定结论 Conclusive Presumption，即意外死亡在没有额外证明的情况下是受保障的。

5.When determining paternity, the court may establish a Conclusive Presumption 推定结论 based on marriage and child legitimacy.

在确定父亲身份时，法院可能会根据婚姻和子女合法性建立一个推定结论 Conclusive Presumption。

作文

In the realm of law and logic, the term Conclusive Presumption refers to a legal assumption that cannot be contradicted or disproven by evidence. This concept plays a crucial role in various legal proceedings, as it simplifies the burden of proof for one party and establishes a clear path for adjudication. Understanding Conclusive Presumption is essential for both legal practitioners and individuals navigating the complex world of law.To illustrate the importance of Conclusive Presumption, consider a hypothetical case involving a car accident. In this scenario, if a witness testifies that they saw the defendant running a red light, the court may apply a Conclusive Presumption that the defendant was indeed negligent. This presumption would mean that the defendant cannot present evidence to counter the witness's testimony; instead, the burden shifts to the defendant to prove that they were not negligent. This legal mechanism streamlines the judicial process, allowing courts to make decisions based on established facts rather than endless disputes over evidence.Moreover, Conclusive Presumption is often used in cases involving statutory laws. For example, many jurisdictions have laws that create a Conclusive Presumption regarding paternity when a child is born during a marriage. In such cases, the law assumes that the husband is the father, and this presumption cannot be challenged unless specific conditions are met. This legal framework provides stability and predictability in family law, ensuring that children have clear legal rights and responsibilities regarding their parents.However, while Conclusive Presumption serves to expedite legal processes, it can also raise concerns about fairness. Critics argue that it may lead to unjust outcomes, particularly if new evidence comes to light after the presumption has been established. For instance, in the aforementioned car accident case, what if new surveillance footage emerges that clearly shows the light was green for the defendant? The Conclusive Presumption would still stand, potentially leading to an erroneous judgment against an innocent party.Additionally, the application of Conclusive Presumption can vary significantly across different jurisdictions. Some regions may have more stringent rules regarding when and how these presumptions can be applied, while others may allow for broader interpretations. This inconsistency can create confusion for individuals seeking justice, as they may not fully understand their rights or the implications of a Conclusive Presumption in their specific case.In conclusion, the concept of Conclusive Presumption is a fundamental aspect of legal practice that helps to streamline court proceedings and establish clear guidelines for evidence and liability. While it offers significant advantages in terms of efficiency and clarity, it also poses challenges that must be carefully navigated to ensure justice is served. Legal professionals must remain vigilant in recognizing the implications of Conclusive Presumption in their cases, balancing the need for expediency with the pursuit of truth and fairness in the judicial system.

在法律和逻辑领域，术语Conclusive Presumption指的是一种法律假设，该假设不能被证据反驳或推翻。这个概念在各种法律程序中发挥着至关重要的作用，因为它简化了一方的举证责任，并为裁决建立了明确的路径。理解Conclusive Presumption对法律从业者和在复杂法律世界中导航的个人至关重要。为了说明Conclusive Presumption的重要性，考虑一个涉及车祸的假设案例。在这个场景中，如果一名证人作证说他们看到被告闯红灯，法院可能会应用Conclusive Presumption，认为被告确实存在过失。这一假设意味着被告不能提出证据来反驳证人的证词；相反，举证责任转移到被告身上，要求其证明自己并没有过失。这一法律机制简化了司法程序，使法院能够基于既定事实做出决定，而不是无休止地争论证据。此外，Conclusive Presumption通常用于涉及法定法律的案件。例如，许多司法管辖区的法律在婚姻期间出生的孩子的父亲身份上创建了Conclusive Presumption。在这种情况下，法律假设丈夫是父亲，除非满足特定条件，否则这一假设不能被挑战。这一法律框架在家庭法中提供了稳定性和可预测性，确保孩子在法律上对父母拥有明确的权利和责任。然而，虽然Conclusive Presumption有助于加快法律程序，但也可能引发关于公平性的担忧。批评者认为，这可能导致不公正的结果，特别是在假设建立后出现新证据的情况下。例如，在前述的车祸案件中，如果出现新的监控录像，清楚地显示被告的灯是绿灯，那么Conclusive Presumption仍然成立，这可能导致对无辜一方的错误判决。此外，Conclusive Presumption的适用在不同的司法管辖区之间可能差异显著。一些地区可能对何时以及如何应用这些假设有更严格的规定，而其他地区可能允许更广泛的解释。这种不一致可能会给寻求公正的个人带来困惑，因为他们可能不完全理解自己的权利或在特定案件中Conclusive Presumption的含义。总之，Conclusive Presumption的概念是法律实践的一个基本方面，有助于简化法庭程序并为证据和责任建立明确的指导原则。尽管在效率和清晰度方面提供了显著的优势，但它也带来了必须谨慎处理的挑战，以确保公正得到实现。法律专业人士必须保持警惕，认识到在其案件中Conclusive Presumption的影响，平衡对迅速解决的需求与追求司法系统中的真相与公平。