coercive power

简明释义

强制权

英英释义

例句

1.The government often resorts to coercive power 强制权力 to enforce laws during times of civil unrest.

政府在民事动荡时期常常诉诸于coercive power 强制权力来执行法律。

2.Using coercive power 强制权力 can lead to resentment among team members.

使用coercive power 强制权力可能会导致团队成员之间的怨恨。

3.In the workplace, a manager might use coercive power 强制权力 to ensure employees meet deadlines.

在工作场所，经理可能会使用coercive power 强制权力来确保员工按时完成任务。

4.Some leaders abuse their coercive power 强制权力 to manipulate followers into compliance.

一些领导滥用他们的coercive power 强制权力来操控追随者服从。

5.The police have the coercive power 强制权力 to arrest individuals who break the law.

警察拥有对违反法律的个人进行逮捕的coercive power 强制权力。

作文

Coercive power is a term that refers to the ability of an individual or group to compel others to act in a certain way through the use of force or threats. This concept is prevalent in various fields, including politics, sociology, and organizational behavior. Understanding coercive power (强制权力) is essential for analyzing dynamics within groups and institutions, as it can significantly influence relationships and outcomes.In political contexts, coercive power (强制权力) is often exercised by governments or authorities to maintain control and order. For example, law enforcement agencies use coercive power to enforce laws and regulations. When individuals break the law, they may face arrest or other punitive measures, which serves as a deterrent to potential offenders. This type of power can be necessary for maintaining societal order; however, it can also lead to abuses if not checked by democratic processes or ethical standards.In organizations, coercive power (强制权力) can manifest in various ways, such as through managerial authority or workplace policies. A manager might use coercive power to ensure compliance from employees by threatening disciplinary action for poor performance or insubordination. While this approach can yield short-term results, it may create a toxic work environment where employees feel undervalued and fearful. Consequently, organizations that rely heavily on coercive power may struggle with high turnover rates and low morale among staff.Furthermore, coercive power (强制权力) can also be observed in social movements and conflicts. For instance, during protests or demonstrations, authorities may respond with force to disperse crowds or suppress dissent. While some argue that such actions are justified to maintain public safety, others view them as violations of civil liberties. The balance between maintaining order and respecting individual rights is a critical issue that arises in discussions about coercive power.It is important to note that while coercive power (强制权力) can achieve compliance, it does not necessarily foster genuine loyalty or respect. Individuals who comply out of fear may harbor resentment toward those wielding power over them. In contrast, leaders who inspire trust and collaboration tend to cultivate a more positive environment, leading to better long-term outcomes. Therefore, it is crucial for leaders and organizations to recognize the limitations of coercive power and seek alternative methods of influence, such as reward power or referent power, which encourage voluntary compliance and commitment.In conclusion, coercive power (强制权力) plays a significant role in various aspects of society, from governance to workplace dynamics. While it can be an effective tool for ensuring compliance and maintaining order, its use must be approached with caution. Over-reliance on coercive power can lead to negative consequences, including resentment and a lack of genuine engagement. As such, it is vital for leaders and decision-makers to balance coercive measures with approaches that promote cooperation, understanding, and mutual respect. By doing so, they can create environments that foster positive relations and sustainable success.

强制权力是一个术语，指的是个人或团体通过使用武力或威胁来迫使他人以某种方式行动的能力。这个概念在政治、社会学和组织行为等多个领域中都很常见。理解coercive power（强制权力）对于分析群体和机构内的动态至关重要，因为它可以显著影响关系和结果。在政治背景下，coercive power（强制权力）通常由政府或当局行使，以维持控制和秩序。例如，执法机构利用强制权力来执行法律和规定。当个人违反法律时，他们可能面临逮捕或其他惩罚措施，这对潜在的违法者起到威慑作用。这种类型的权力对于维护社会秩序是必要的；然而，如果没有民主程序或伦理标准的制衡，它也可能导致滥用。在组织中，coercive power（强制权力）可以以多种方式表现出来，例如通过管理权威或工作场所政策。经理可能会利用强制权力确保员工遵守，通过威胁因表现不佳或不服从而受到纪律处分来实现。虽然这种方法可以产生短期效果，但可能会造成一种有毒的工作环境，使员工感到不被重视和恐惧。因此，过度依赖强制权力的组织可能会面临高员工流失率和低士气的问题。此外，coercive power（强制权力）在社会运动和冲突中也可以观察到。例如，在抗议或示威期间，当局可能会以武力回应，以驱散人群或压制异议。虽然一些人认为这样的行动是为了维护公共安全，但另一些人则将其视为对公民自由的侵犯。在讨论强制权力时，维护秩序与尊重个人权利之间的平衡是一个关键问题。需要注意的是，虽然coercive power（强制权力）可以实现遵从，但并不一定能培养真正的忠诚或尊重。出于恐惧而遵从的个人可能会对施加权力的人怀有怨恨。相比之下，激励信任和合作的领导者往往会培养更积极的环境，从而带来更好的长期结果。因此，领导者和组织必须认识到强制权力的局限性，并寻求其他影响方法，例如奖励权力或参照权力，这些方法鼓励自愿遵从和承诺。总之，coercive power（强制权力）在社会的各个方面发挥着重要作用，从治理到工作场所动态。虽然它可以是确保遵从和维护秩序的有效工具，但其使用必须谨慎对待。过度依赖强制权力可能导致负面后果，包括怨恨和缺乏真正的参与。因此，领导者和决策者必须平衡强制措施与促进合作、理解和相互尊重的方法。通过这样做，他们可以创造出促进积极关系和可持续成功的环境。