discretional

简明释义

英[dɪˈskreʃənəl]美[dɪˈskreʃənəl]

adj. 任意的（等于 discretionary）；自由决定的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The convenient principle, the economic litigation and the public interest are the legal foundation of the discretional non-prosecution system.

便宜主义、诉讼经济和公共利益是酌定不起诉制度的法理基础。

2.Therefore, the national accounting firms should improve the audit quality about discretional accruals.

因此，我国会计师事务所应该提高操控性应计利润的审计质量。

3.Meanwhile, discretional evaluation of evidence under the notary verification is not absolutely free. Therefore a certain degree of regulation is necessary.

同时，公证核实下的自由心证也并非绝对，一定程度的规制是十分必要的。

4.If the discretional non-prosecution power is abused, the relationships among the victim, the suspect and the prosecution will be strained, and impede the realization of the aspirations of victims.

酌定不起诉如果被滥用，会造成被害人、犯罪嫌疑人、检察机关三者之间关系的紧张，并且阻碍被害人诉求的实现。

5.The system of discretional non-prosecution is not only beneficial to the punitive purposes and the efficiency of criminal procedure, but also accords with the needs of public welfare.

酌定不起诉制度有利于刑罚目的的实现和诉讼效率的提高，符合社会公共利益的需要。

6.When any action neglecting to perform the obligation of discretional act violates the rule of reason, it constitutes violation as administrative omission.

行政不作为违法以现实的行政作为义务存在为前提，以行政主体能够履行而未履行为必要。

7.In cases of emergency, the principal can exercise discretional judgment to cancel classes.

在紧急情况下，校长可以行使自由裁量权来取消课程。

8.The charity allocates funds based on discretional criteria set by the board.

慈善机构根据董事会设定的自由裁量标准分配资金。

9.The manager has the authority to make discretional decisions regarding employee promotions.

经理有权做出关于员工晋升的自由裁量决定。

10.Judges often have discretional power to impose sentences based on the circumstances of the case.

法官通常有自由裁量权根据案件的情况判处刑罚。

11.The board approved a discretional budget for community projects.

董事会批准了一个用于社区项目的自由裁量预算。

作文

In today's fast-paced world, the concept of discretional power is becoming increasingly significant, especially in the realms of business and governance. Discretional authority refers to the ability of individuals or organizations to make decisions based on their own judgment rather than being strictly bound by rules or regulations. This flexibility can lead to innovative solutions and more personalized services, but it also comes with its own set of challenges and responsibilities.For instance, in a corporate setting, managers often have discretional power when it comes to hiring new employees. Rather than following a rigid set of criteria, they may assess candidates based on their intuition and experience. This can result in a more diverse and dynamic workforce, as managers are able to consider qualities that standard metrics might overlook. However, this discretional approach can also lead to biases if not managed carefully. It is essential for organizations to implement checks and balances to ensure that discretional decisions are fair and equitable.Similarly, in the public sector, government officials wield discretional power when making policy decisions. For example, a city mayor may choose to allocate funds to a community project based on the specific needs of that area, rather than adhering strictly to a predetermined budget. This discretional decision-making can be beneficial, as it allows for resources to be directed where they are most needed. However, it can also lead to accusations of favoritism or mismanagement if the process lacks transparency.The balance between discretional authority and accountability is crucial. Organizations and governments must establish clear guidelines on how discretional power is exercised to prevent misuse. Training programs that emphasize ethical decision-making can help individuals understand the weight of their choices and the potential impact on others. Moreover, fostering a culture of openness can encourage stakeholders to voice concerns about discretional decisions that may seem unjust or arbitrary.In conclusion, while discretional power can enhance creativity and responsiveness in both business and government, it is vital to approach it with caution. The ability to make decisions based on personal judgment should be complemented by a strong framework of accountability and ethical standards. By doing so, we can harness the benefits of discretional authority while minimizing the risks associated with it. Ultimately, the goal should be to create environments where discretional decisions lead to positive outcomes for all stakeholders involved.

在当今快节奏的世界中，discretional 权力的概念变得越来越重要，尤其是在商业和治理领域。Discretional 权威是指个人或组织根据自己的判断而非严格遵循规则或法规做出决策的能力。这种灵活性可以导致创新的解决方案和更个性化的服务，但它也带来了自身的一系列挑战和责任。例如，在企业环境中，经理在招聘新员工时通常拥有 discretional 权力。他们可能会根据直觉和经验评估候选人，而不是遵循严格的标准。这可能导致更具多样性和活力的员工队伍，因为经理能够考虑到标准指标可能忽视的品质。然而，这种 discretional 方法如果管理不当，也可能导致偏见。因此，组织必须实施检查和平衡，以确保 discretional 决策是公平和公正的。同样，在公共部门，政府官员在制定政策决策时也拥有 discretional 权力。例如，一位市长可能会选择将资金分配给某个社区项目，基于该地区的具体需求，而不是严格遵循预定预算。这种 discretional 决策可能是有益的，因为它允许资源被引导到最需要的地方。然而，如果这个过程缺乏透明度，也可能导致偏袒或管理不善的指控。在 discretional 权力与问责制之间取得平衡至关重要。组织和政府必须建立明确的指导方针，以规范 discretional 权力的行使，以防止滥用。强调伦理决策的培训项目可以帮助个人理解他们选择的分量及其对他人的潜在影响。此外，培养开放文化可以鼓励利益相关者对看似不公正或任意的 discretional 决策表达关切。总之，虽然 discretional 权力可以增强商业和政府的创造力和响应能力，但谨慎对待这一点至关重要。根据个人判断做出决策的能力应当与强有力的问责和伦理标准框架相辅相成。通过这样做，我们可以利用 discretional 权威的好处，同时尽量减少与之相关的风险。最终，目标应该是创造一个环境，使 discretional 决策能为所有相关利益方带来积极的结果。