coarse regulation

简明释义

粗调节

英英释义

例句

1.Due to the coarse regulation of the fishing industry, many species are at risk of overfishing.

由于渔业的粗略的监管，许多物种面临过度捕捞的风险。

2.In agriculture, coarse regulation can lead to unsustainable farming practices.

在农业中，粗略的监管可能导致不可持续的农业实践。

3.The company faced penalties due to its coarse regulation of safety standards.

由于其安全标准的粗略的监管，该公司面临罚款。

4.The government implemented a coarse regulation to control pollution levels in the city.

政府实施了一项粗略的监管来控制城市的污染水平。

5.Experts criticized the coarse regulation that failed to address the nuances of the financial market.

专家批评了未能解决金融市场细微差别的粗略的监管。

作文

In the realm of governance and policy-making, the term coarse regulation is often used to describe a type of regulatory approach that is broad and somewhat imprecise. Unlike fine regulation, which aims to address specific issues with detailed rules and guidelines, coarse regulation tends to set general parameters within which individuals and organizations must operate. This can be particularly useful in rapidly changing environments where flexibility is essential. For instance, in the tech industry, regulations might need to adapt quickly to new innovations and market dynamics. Therefore, a coarse regulation approach allows for a more adaptable framework that can accommodate unforeseen developments.However, while coarse regulation can provide necessary flexibility, it also comes with its own set of challenges. One major concern is that such regulations can lead to ambiguity. Businesses may struggle to understand what is expected of them, leading to inconsistent compliance and potential negative outcomes. Additionally, the lack of specificity can create loopholes that some entities might exploit, undermining the very purpose of regulation.A historical example of coarse regulation can be observed in environmental policies. Many countries have implemented broad laws aimed at reducing pollution without detailing the exact measures that companies must take. This has allowed businesses to choose their methods for compliance, which can lead to innovative solutions. However, it can also result in varying degrees of effectiveness, as companies interpret the regulations differently.Furthermore, coarse regulation can impact public trust in regulatory bodies. When regulations are perceived as vague or ineffective, citizens may become disillusioned with the government's ability to protect their interests. This is particularly critical in areas such as public health and safety, where clear and precise regulations are vital for ensuring community well-being.To strike a balance, it is essential for policymakers to consider the context in which coarse regulation is applied. In sectors where rapid innovation is prevalent, such as technology or renewable energy, a more flexible regulatory framework may be beneficial. Yet, in areas where public safety is paramount, such as food and drug safety, more precise regulations may be necessary to ensure compliance and protect consumers.In conclusion, coarse regulation serves as a double-edged sword in the landscape of policy-making. While it offers flexibility and adaptability, it also poses risks related to ambiguity and inconsistency. Policymakers must carefully evaluate the implications of adopting a coarse regulation approach and strive for a balance that fosters innovation while ensuring accountability and protection for the public. Ultimately, the goal should be to create a regulatory environment that is both effective and responsive to the needs of society.

在治理和政策制定领域，术语粗略监管常用于描述一种宽泛且不太精确的监管方式。与旨在通过详细规则和指南解决特定问题的精细监管不同，粗略监管倾向于设定一般参数，个人和组织必须在这些参数内运作。这在快速变化的环境中尤其有用，因为灵活性至关重要。例如，在科技行业，法规可能需要迅速适应新的创新和市场动态。因此，粗略监管方法允许更具适应性的框架，以适应不可预见的发展。然而，尽管粗略监管可以提供必要的灵活性，但它也带来了自己的挑战。一大主要担忧是，这种监管可能导致模糊性。企业可能会难以理解对他们的期望，导致不一致的合规性和潜在的负面结果。此外，缺乏具体性可能会产生一些实体可能利用的漏洞，从而破坏监管的目的。粗略监管的一个历史例子可以在环境政策中观察到。许多国家实施了广泛的法律，旨在减少污染，而没有详细说明公司必须采取的确切措施。这使得企业能够选择其合规的方法，这可能导致创新解决方案。然而，这也可能导致有效性差异，因为公司对法规的解释各不相同。此外，粗略监管可能影响公众对监管机构的信任。当法规被认为模糊或无效时，公民可能会对政府保护其利益的能力感到失望。这在公共健康和安全等领域尤为重要，在这些领域，明确和精确的法规对于确保社区福祉至关重要。为了达到平衡，政策制定者必须考虑粗略监管适用的背景。在快速创新盛行的行业，例如技术或可再生能源，较灵活的监管框架可能是有益的。然而，在公共安全至关重要的领域，如食品和药品安全，更精确的法规可能是必要的，以确保合规并保护消费者。总之，粗略监管在政策制定的领域中是一把双刃剑。虽然它提供了灵活性和适应性，但也带来了与模糊性和不一致性相关的风险。政策制定者必须仔细评估采用粗略监管方法的影响，并努力寻求一个既能促进创新又能确保问责和保护公众的平衡。最终目标应该是创造一个既有效又能响应社会需求的监管环境。