marketization

简明释义

英[/ˌmɑrkɪtəˈzeɪʃən/]美[/ˌmɑrkɪtəˈzeɪʃən/]

n. 市场化；自由市场经济化；向自由市场经济转化

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.ChapterV: The negative effect being brought about by rate marketization.

第五章：利率市场化可能带来的负面影响。

2.The target of the reform of interest rate system is marketization.

我国利率体制改革的目标是实现利率市场化。

3.On the basis of studying the universality of the MRSIHE, taking the marketization of rear service in Shantou University as a case, the author studies the particularity .

在研究一般的基础上，作者以汕头大学为案例研究了特殊。

4.Housing marketization provides an opportunity for households to choose their residences.

住房市场提供了一个机会，为家庭选择他们的住所。

5.The influence between the change of interest rate and security market will have an important role on the stabilization of whole economy after implementing interest-rate marketization.

在利率市场化后，利率的变动与证券市场之间的相互影响对于整个经济的稳定非常重要。

6.The marketization of exchange rate may narrow deposit-to-loan spreads.

利率市场化将会造成存贷利差的收窄。

7.Many countries are undergoing marketization to boost their economies.

许多国家正在经历市场化以促进经济增长。

8.The government is pushing for the marketization of its energy sector.

政府正在推动能源部门的市场化。

9.The marketization of education has sparked debates about accessibility.

教育的市场化引发了关于可及性的争论。

10.The marketization of public services has led to increased efficiency.

公共服务的市场化导致了效率的提高。

11.Critics argue that the marketization of healthcare can compromise quality.

批评者认为医疗的市场化可能会影响质量。

作文

In recent decades, the concept of marketization has gained significant attention in both academic and policy-making circles. Marketization refers to the process of introducing market forces into areas traditionally governed by state control or regulation. This shift towards a more market-oriented approach is often seen in sectors such as education, healthcare, and public services. The implications of marketization are profound, as they reshape not only the structure of these sectors but also the relationships between consumers, providers, and the government.One of the primary arguments in favor of marketization is its potential to enhance efficiency and innovation. When competition is introduced, organizations are incentivized to improve their services and reduce costs to attract consumers. For example, in the education sector, the introduction of charter schools and school vouchers has created a competitive environment that encourages traditional public schools to innovate and improve their offerings. This can lead to better educational outcomes for students as schools strive to meet the demands of parents and students alike.However, the process of marketization is not without its critics. Detractors argue that it can lead to inequality and a decline in the quality of services. In a purely market-driven system, those who can afford to pay for better services will do so, while others may be left with subpar options. This is particularly concerning in essential services like healthcare, where the stakes are high, and access to quality care should not be determined by one's ability to pay. Critics also point out that marketization can result in a focus on profit over public good, leading to a neglect of vulnerable populations who may not be profitable to serve.Moreover, marketization can create challenges in terms of accountability and regulation. As private entities take over roles traditionally held by the government, ensuring that these organizations adhere to standards of quality and equity becomes increasingly complex. The government may find it difficult to regulate these entities effectively, leading to potential abuses and a lack of oversight. This is particularly evident in the privatization of prisons, where profit motives can conflict with the goals of justice and rehabilitation.Despite these challenges, many countries have embraced marketization as a means to reform inefficient systems. In the United Kingdom, for instance, the National Health Service (NHS) has undergone various reforms aimed at introducing market principles to improve efficiency. While some successes have been reported, the debate continues over whether such reforms have genuinely benefited patients or merely served to enrich private companies.In conclusion, marketization is a complex and multifaceted process that brings both opportunities and challenges. It has the potential to drive efficiency and innovation, but it also raises important questions about equity, accountability, and the role of government. As societies continue to grapple with the implications of marketization, it is crucial to strike a balance that maximizes benefits while minimizing harm. Policymakers must carefully consider the context and consequences of introducing market mechanisms into public services, ensuring that the ultimate goal remains the well-being of all citizens, not just those who can afford to pay. Understanding marketization in this nuanced way is essential for anyone engaged in discussions about the future of public services and the role of the market in society.

近年来，市场化这一概念在学术界和政策制定圈中引起了广泛关注。市场化是指将市场力量引入传统上由国家控制或监管的领域的过程。这种向更市场导向的方法的转变通常出现在教育、医疗和公共服务等行业。市场化的影响深远，因为它不仅重塑了这些行业的结构，还改变了消费者、提供者和政府之间的关系。支持市场化的主要论点之一是其提高效率和创新的潜力。当竞争被引入时，组织被激励改善其服务并降低成本以吸引消费者。例如，在教育领域，特许学校和学券的引入创造了一个竞争环境，鼓励传统公立学校进行创新并改善其提供的服务。这可以导致学生的教育成果更好，因为学校努力满足家长和学生的需求。然而，市场化的过程并非没有批评者。反对者认为，这可能导致不平等和服务质量的下降。在一个纯粹的市场驱动系统中，那些能够支付更好服务的人将会这样做，而其他人可能会被迫接受质量较差的选择。这在医疗等重要服务中尤为令人担忧，因为风险很高，获得优质护理不应由个人的支付能力来决定。批评者还指出，市场化可能导致对利润而非公共利益的关注，导致对可能不盈利的弱势群体的忽视。此外，市场化还可能在问责制和监管方面带来挑战。随着私营实体接管传统上由政府承担的角色，确保这些组织遵循质量和公平标准变得越来越复杂。政府可能发现很难有效地监管这些实体，从而导致潜在的滥用和缺乏监督。这在监狱的私有化中尤为明显，利润动机可能与司法和康复的目标相冲突。尽管面临这些挑战，许多国家还是将市场化视为改革低效系统的一种手段。例如，在英国，国家健康服务体系（NHS）经历了各种旨在引入市场原则以提高效率的改革。虽然一些成功的案例被报道，但围绕这些改革是否真正惠及患者的辩论仍在继续，还是仅仅为私营公司带来了利益。总之，市场化是一个复杂且多面的过程，带来了机遇和挑战。它有潜力推动效率和创新，但也提出了关于公平、问责和政府角色的重要问题。随着社会继续应对市场化的影响，找到一种平衡，以最大化利益，同时最小化伤害至关重要。政策制定者必须仔细考虑在公共服务中引入市场机制的背景和后果，确保最终目标仍然是所有公民的福祉，而不仅仅是那些能够支付的人。以这种细致入微的方式理解市场化对于任何参与公共服务未来讨论和市场在社会中角色的人来说都是至关重要的。