vetoes

简明释义

英[ˈviːtəʊz]美[ˈviːtoʊz]

n. 否决

否决权

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.That's not the case. Actually, India getting the UNSC permanent seat mainly depends upon whether China supports it, or vetoes it.

这并不稀奇，印度之所以想在联合国安理会上获得常任理事国主要还得依靠中国是否支持它。

2.South Africa's abstention effectively backed Russia's and China's vetoes.

南非的弃权，有效地支持了俄罗斯和中国的否决。

3.What if his brother vetoes his attendance?

是他兄弟禁止他出席怎么办？

4.Look out for possible German or British vetoes.

这些国家将会期待德国或英国可能投的否决票。

5.But enlargement is no justification for the proposed removal of more than 40 vetoes in areas ranging from "economic co-ordination" to energy policy.

但扩张并不能成为取消从经济合作到能源政策等超过40个领域的否决权的理由。

6.Abolishing national vetoes still matters, but for a different reason.

废除国家否决权仍然重要，但却是为了不同原因。

7.They want Mr Cameron to use Britain’s vetoes now, not just talk about preserving them.

他们希望卡梅伦不要只是空泛的大谈保护民众利益，他还不如现在就投上反对票。

8.In some countries, the parliament can override the vetoes of the president.

在一些国家，议会可以推翻总统的否决。

9.She used her vetoes wisely to block harmful policies.

她明智地使用了她的否决权来阻止有害的政策。

10.The governor's vetoes on the budget proposals caused a delay in funding.

州长对预算提案的否决导致了资金的延迟。

11.The president has the power to vetoes any legislation he disagrees with.

总统有权对他不同意的任何立法进行否决。

12.The council's decision was overturned because one member exercised their vetoes.

由于一名成员行使了他们的否决权，委员会的决定被推翻。

作文

In the realm of politics, the concept of a veto (否决权) plays a crucial role in maintaining a balance of power among different branches of government. A veto is an official rejection of a proposed law or decision, and it is typically exercised by a leader or governing body to prevent legislation from being enacted. The ability to issue vetoes (否决) serves as a critical check on the legislative process, ensuring that no single entity can dominate the political landscape without accountability.The importance of vetoes (否决权) can be observed in various political systems around the world. For instance, in the United States, the President has the power to veto legislation passed by Congress. This means that even if both houses of Congress agree on a bill, the President can refuse to sign it into law, effectively blocking its implementation. This mechanism was established by the framers of the Constitution to prevent any one branch of government from becoming too powerful. When a President issues a veto (否决), it often sparks significant debate and discussion within the political arena. Lawmakers may attempt to override the veto (否决权) by garnering a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. This process highlights the collaborative nature of governance, as it requires bipartisan support to challenge the President’s decision. The use of vetoes (否决) can also reflect the political climate of the time, revealing the tensions between different political parties and ideologies.Moreover, vetoes (否决权) are not limited to national governments; they are also prevalent in state and local governments. Governors often possess the power to veto legislation passed by state legislatures, which can significantly influence state policy and governance. For example, a governor might exercise their veto (否决) on a budget proposal that they believe does not adequately address the needs of their constituents. This ability to veto (否决权) helps ensure that elected officials remain responsive to the public’s demands and priorities.In addition to political contexts, the term veto (否决权) can also extend to organizational and corporate governance. Boards of directors may have the authority to veto certain decisions made by executives, thereby safeguarding the interests of shareholders and stakeholders. This form of oversight is essential for maintaining ethical standards and accountability within organizations.The implications of vetoes (否决) extend beyond mere procedural mechanics; they embody the principles of democracy and the rule of law. By allowing leaders to reject proposals that may not serve the public good, vetoes (否决权) promote a system of checks and balances that is fundamental to democratic governance. However, the power to veto (否决) can also be contentious, leading to accusations of political maneuvering or obstructionism. Critics argue that frequent vetoes (否决) can hinder progress and prevent necessary reforms from being implemented.In conclusion, the concept of vetoes (否决权) is integral to the functioning of democratic systems. It serves as a vital tool for leaders to ensure that legislation aligns with the values and needs of the populace. While the power to veto (否决) can be a source of contention, it ultimately reinforces the principle that governance should reflect the will of the people, fostering a more balanced and fair political environment.

在政治领域，veto（否决权）的概念在维护不同政府分支之间的权力平衡方面起着至关重要的作用。veto是对拟议法律或决策的正式拒绝，通常由领导者或管理机构行使，以防止立法的实施。行使vetoes（否决）能力作为立法过程中的关键制衡，确保没有单一实体能够在没有问责的情况下主导政治格局。vetoes（否决权）的重要性可以在世界各地的各种政治体系中观察到。例如，在美国，总统有权对国会通过的立法进行veto。这意味着即使国会两院都同意一项法案，总统也可以拒绝签署，使其成为法律，从而有效阻止其实施。这个机制是宪法制定者为防止任何一个政府分支变得过于强大而设立的。当总统发布veto（否决）时，通常会在政治舞台上引发重大辩论和讨论。立法者可能会试图通过在众议院和参议院获得三分之二的多数票来推翻veto（否决权）。这个过程突显了治理的协作性质，因为它需要跨党派的支持来挑战总统的决定。vetoes（否决）的使用也可以反映当时的政治气候，揭示不同政党和意识形态之间的紧张关系。此外，vetoes（否决权）并不仅限于国家政府；它们在州和地方政府中也很普遍。州长通常拥有对州立法机构通过的立法进行veto的权力，这可以显著影响州政策和治理。例如，州长可能会对一项预算提案行使veto（否决），因为他们认为该提案未能充分满足选民的需求。这种veto（否决权）能力有助于确保选举官员对公众的要求和优先事项保持响应。除了政治背景之外，veto（否决权）一词还可以扩展到组织和企业治理。董事会可能有权对高管做出的某些决定进行veto，从而保护股东和利益相关者的利益。这种监督形式对于维护组织内部的道德标准和问责制至关重要。vetoes（否决）的影响超出了单纯的程序机制；它们体现了民主原则和法治。通过允许领导人拒绝那些可能不符合公共利益的提案，vetoes（否决权）促进了民主治理的基础性制衡系统。然而，行使veto（否决）权也可能引发争议，导致对政治操控或阻挠主义的指责。批评者认为，频繁的vetoes（否决）可能会阻碍进展，妨碍必要改革的实施。总之，vetoes（否决权）的概念是民主制度运作的重要组成部分。它作为领导者确保立法与公众价值观和需求相一致的重要工具。尽管行使veto（否决）权可能是争议的源泉，但它最终加强了治理应反映人民意志的原则，从而促进一个更加平衡和公平的政治环境。