technocrats

简明释义

[ˈtɛknəkræts][ˈtɛknəˌkræts]

n. 技术专家(technocrat 的复数);科技主义者

英英释义

Technocrats are individuals who advocate for or are part of a system of governance or management based on technical expertise and scientific knowledge, particularly in areas such as engineering, economics, and technology.

技术官僚是倡导或参与基于技术专长和科学知识的治理或管理体系的个人,尤其是在工程、经济和技术等领域。

单词用法

technocratic governance

技术治理

a panel of technocrats

技术官僚小组

technocratic leadership

技术领导

technocrats in power

掌权的技术官僚

the rise of technocrats

技术官僚的崛起

technocrats and policymakers

技术官僚与政策制定者

同义词

technicians

技术人员

The technicians are responsible for maintaining the machinery.

技术人员负责维护机器。

experts

专家

Experts in the field were called to provide their insights.

该领域的专家被邀请提供他们的见解。

specialists

专业人士

Specialists often have a deep understanding of specific areas.

专业人士通常对特定领域有深入的理解。

engineers

工程师

Engineers designed the new infrastructure project.

工程师设计了新的基础设施项目。

反义词

populists

民粹主义者

Populists often prioritize the needs of the general public over expert opinions.

民粹主义者通常优先考虑公众的需求,而不是专家的意见。

ideologues

意识形态者

Ideologues may focus on their beliefs rather than practical solutions.

意识形态者可能更关注他们的信念,而不是实际解决方案。

例句

1.The country’s technocrats do worry about the impact of inflows but they see the exchange rate as the most important shock absorber.

该国的技术专家确实担心热钱流入的影响,但是他们认为汇率是最重要的缓冲器。

2.Several officials in their 60s with experience as technocrats and in the military and intelligence services also seem to be in the running.

有几个60来岁在军事和情报部门工作的资深技术专家型官员似乎也有登龙门的希望。

3.Sometimes it's used as a term of scorn - the creators of the euro, we're told, were technocrats who failed to take human and cultural factors into account.

有时候,它被用作蔑视,例如人们告诉我们,欧元的创立者是一些没有考虑到人性级文化因素的技术官僚。

4.Technocrats can tell producers what they can charge, but they cannot prevent the inevitable.

技术专家能够告知发电厂他们可以如何收费,但却不能够阻止这场危机。

5.Several of the technocrats who presided over Dubai’s boomtime borrowing have been sidelined. The people now in charge may feel less beholden to Dubai’s creditors.

曾经在迪拜繁荣时期掌管借贷事务的技术官员,其中有一部分已经被撩了在一边,而当下掌舵者对于债权人的态度,好像也不再像过去那样心存感激。

6.Then, the system needs to find alternatives unblemished by the disastrous decisions of the past-and technocrats fit the bill.

那么,这个体系需要寻求对过去灾难性决策保持清白的代替品——而技术专家符合这个要求。

7.China's technocrats managed to fix its once faulty airlines.

中国的技术人员设法去修复这条曾经出错的航线。

8.A woman from Friends of the Earth accuses the panel of being free-market technocrats.

一个地球友人(Friendsofthe Earth)的女士指责世界经济论坛的专门问题小组只是一群倡导自由市场的技术派。

9.The government appointed a group of technocrats 技术官僚 to manage the economic recovery plan.

政府任命了一组技术官僚来管理经济复苏计划。

10.Critics argue that technocrats 技术官僚 lack the empathy needed to address social issues effectively.

批评者认为技术官僚缺乏有效解决社会问题所需的同理心。

11.The rise of technocrats 技术官僚 in the administration has led to more data-driven policies.

行政部门中技术官僚的崛起导致了更多基于数据的政策。

12.The city hired technocrats 技术官僚 to improve its public transportation system.

该市雇佣了技术官僚来改善公共交通系统。

13.Many believe that technocrats 技术官僚 can make better decisions than politicians in times of crisis.

许多人认为在危机时期,技术官僚能做出比政治家更好的决策。

作文

In today's rapidly evolving world, the role of technocrats (技术官僚) has become increasingly significant. These individuals are often experts in their respective fields, particularly in science, engineering, and technology. They bring a wealth of knowledge and practical skills to the table, which can be invaluable in addressing complex societal challenges. As governments and organizations grapple with issues such as climate change, economic instability, and public health crises, the input from technocrats (技术官僚) is more crucial than ever.One of the primary advantages of having technocrats (技术官僚) in leadership positions is their ability to make informed decisions based on empirical data and scientific research. Unlike traditional politicians, who may rely on popular opinion or political expediency, technocrats (技术官僚) prioritize evidence-based policies. This approach can lead to more effective solutions that are grounded in reality rather than ideology.For instance, during the COVID-19 pandemic, many countries turned to health technocrats (技术官僚) to guide their responses. Public health officials and epidemiologists provided critical insights that shaped lockdown measures, vaccination strategies, and public health campaigns. Their expertise helped to mitigate the spread of the virus and save countless lives. Without the input of these technocrats (技术官僚), the response could have been far less effective.Moreover, technocrats (技术官僚) often possess a unique ability to bridge the gap between technical knowledge and public policy. They can translate complex scientific concepts into actionable policies that are understandable to the general public. This skill is essential for garnering public support for necessary but potentially unpopular measures, such as environmental regulations or public health initiatives.However, the rise of technocrats (技术官僚) is not without its challenges. Critics argue that an overreliance on technical expertise can lead to a disconnect between policymakers and the citizens they serve. When decisions are made solely by technocrats (技术官僚), there is a risk of sidelining important social and ethical considerations. For example, while a technocrat (技术官僚) may advocate for a particular technological solution to a problem, they might overlook the potential social implications or the needs of marginalized communities.Furthermore, the increasing influence of technocrats (技术官僚) raises questions about accountability and democratic governance. If decisions are predominantly made by experts, what happens to the democratic process? It is essential to strike a balance between technical expertise and democratic engagement. Citizens should have a voice in shaping the policies that affect their lives, even if those policies are informed by technocrats (技术官僚).In conclusion, technocrats (技术官僚) play a vital role in contemporary governance, especially in an age marked by rapid technological advancements and complex global challenges. Their expertise is invaluable in crafting effective, evidence-based policies. However, it is equally important to ensure that their influence does not overshadow the voices of the public. A collaborative approach that combines the insights of technocrats (技术官僚) with active citizen participation can lead to more equitable and sustainable solutions for society as a whole.

在当今快速发展的世界中,技术官僚的角色变得越来越重要。这些人通常是各自领域的专家,尤其是在科学、工程和技术方面。他们带来了丰富的知识和实用技能,这对解决复杂的社会挑战非常宝贵。当政府和组织面临气候变化、经济不稳定和公共卫生危机等问题时,来自技术官僚的意见比以往任何时候都更为重要。拥有技术官僚担任领导职务的主要优势之一是他们能够根据实证数据和科学研究做出明智的决定。与依赖公众舆论或政治权宜之计的传统政治家不同,技术官僚优先考虑基于证据的政策。这种方法可以导致更有效的解决方案,这些方案扎根于现实,而不是意识形态。例如,在COVID-19大流行期间,许多国家转向健康技术官僚来指导应对措施。公共卫生官员和流行病学家提供了关键见解,塑造了封锁措施、疫苗接种策略和公共卫生运动。他们的专业知识帮助减缓了病毒的传播,挽救了无数生命。如果没有这些技术官僚的参与,反应可能会远不如有效。此外,技术官僚通常具备独特的能力,可以弥合技术知识与公共政策之间的差距。他们能够将复杂的科学概念转化为普通公众可以理解的可行政策。这一技能对于获得公众对必要但可能不受欢迎的措施(如环境法规或公共卫生倡议)的支持至关重要。然而,技术官僚的崛起并非没有挑战。批评者认为,过度依赖技术专长可能导致政策制定者与他们所服务的公民之间的脱节。当决策主要由技术官僚作出时,可能会忽视重要的社会和伦理考量。例如,虽然一位技术官僚可能会主张某个特定的技术解决方案,但他们可能会忽视潜在的社会影响或边缘社区的需求。此外,技术官僚日益增强的影响力引发了对问责制和民主治理的质疑。如果决策主要由专家做出,那么民主过程会如何?确保技术专长与民主参与之间的平衡至关重要。公民应该在塑造影响他们生活的政策方面拥有发言权,即使这些政策是由技术官僚提供信息的。总之,技术官僚在当代治理中发挥着重要作用,尤其是在一个以快速技术进步和复杂全球挑战为标志的时代。他们的专业知识在制定有效的基于证据的政策方面是不可或缺的。然而,同样重要的是要确保他们的影响力不会掩盖公众的声音。结合技术官僚的见解与积极的公民参与的协作方法,可以为整个社会带来更公平和可持续的解决方案。