caudillos
简明释义
英[ˈkɔː.dɪ.joʊs]美[ˈkɔː.dɪ.joʊs]
n. 元首,领袖(caudillo 的变形)
英英释义
A caudillo is a military or political leader in Spain or Latin America, often characterized by authoritarian rule. | caudillo是西班牙或拉丁美洲的军事或政治领袖,通常以独裁统治为特征。 |
单词用法
同义词
反义词
民主主义者 | 这位民主主义者倡导更具包容性的政府。 | ||
领导者 | 这位领导者激励他的团队实现目标。 | ||
追随者 | 作为追随者,她支持导师的想法。 |
例句
1.And so do caudillos: in Venezuela Hugo Chávez, having squandered a vast oil windfall, is trying to bully his way to an ugly victory in a legislative election later this month.
委内瑞拉的查韦斯挥霍了大笔石油横财,试图用无耻手段赢得本月末的立法选举。
2.And so do caudillos: in Venezuela Hugo Chávez, having squandered a vast oil windfall, is trying to bully his way to an ugly victory in a legislative election later this month.
委内瑞拉的查韦斯挥霍了大笔石油横财,试图用无耻手段赢得本月末的立法选举。
3.In many Latin American countries, the influence of caudillos (地方军阀) has shaped political landscapes.
在许多拉丁美洲国家,caudillos(地方军阀)的影响塑造了政治格局。
4.Historically, caudillos (地方军阀) were known for their military leadership and personal charisma.
历史上,地方军阀以其军事领导能力和个人魅力而闻名。
5.Some caudillos (地方军阀) gained power through revolutions or coups.
一些地方军阀通过革命或政变获得权力。
6.The legacy of caudillos (地方军阀) continues to influence contemporary politics in the region.
地方军阀的遗产继续影响该地区当代政治。
7.The rise of caudillos (地方军阀) often led to authoritarian regimes.
地方军阀的崛起通常导致专制政权。
作文
The term caudillos, derived from the Spanish word for 'leader' or 'chief', refers to military or political leaders in Spanish-speaking countries, particularly during the 19th and early 20th centuries. The concept of caudillos is deeply rooted in the history and culture of Latin America, where these figures often emerged during times of political instability and social upheaval. In many cases, caudillos were charismatic leaders who commanded loyalty and respect from their followers, often through a combination of personal charisma, military prowess, and populist rhetoric.Historically, caudillos played a significant role in shaping the political landscape of various Latin American nations. For instance, figures such as Juan Manuel de Rosas in Argentina and Porfirio Díaz in Mexico exemplify the dual nature of caudillos as both liberators and oppressors. While they often rose to power by promising stability and reform, their authoritarian tendencies frequently led to the suppression of dissent and the perpetuation of inequality.The rise of caudillos can be attributed to several factors, including colonial legacies, social stratification, and the weakness of central governments. After gaining independence from colonial powers, many Latin American countries struggled to establish stable governments, leading to a power vacuum that was often filled by strongmen or military leaders. These caudillos capitalized on the discontent of the populace, presenting themselves as protectors of the people against foreign influence and internal chaos.In addition to their political roles, caudillos often embodied cultural ideals of masculinity and strength. They were frequently portrayed as heroic figures in literature and folklore, symbolizing resistance against oppression and the fight for national identity. This romanticization of caudillos has had lasting effects on the collective memory and identity of many Latin American societies.However, the legacy of caudillos is complex. While some are remembered for their contributions to nation-building and social change, others are criticized for their brutal tactics and disregard for democratic principles. The phenomenon of caudillos raises important questions about leadership, authority, and the nature of power in society. It challenges us to consider how historical figures are constructed and remembered, and what lessons can be drawn from their successes and failures.In contemporary discussions, the term caudillos is sometimes used to describe modern leaders who exhibit similar traits of authoritarianism and populism. As political landscapes continue to evolve, the characteristics associated with caudillos remain relevant, prompting ongoing debates about the balance between power and democracy. Understanding the historical context and implications of caudillos is essential for analyzing current political dynamics in Latin America and beyond.In conclusion, the concept of caudillos serves as a lens through which we can examine the complexities of leadership and governance in Latin America. By studying the rise and fall of these figures, we gain insights into the enduring challenges faced by societies grappling with issues of power, identity, and social justice. Whether viewed as heroes or villains, the legacy of caudillos continues to shape the political discourse and cultural narratives of the region, reminding us of the intricate interplay between history and contemporary society.
“caudillos”这个词源于西班牙语,意为“领导者”或“首领”,指的是19世纪和20世纪初西班牙语国家的军事或政治领导人。“caudillos”这一概念深深植根于拉丁美洲的历史和文化中,这些人物常常在政治不稳定和社会动荡时期出现。在许多情况下,caudillos是具有个人魅力、军事才能和民粹主义言辞的魅力领导者,他们赢得了追随者的忠诚和尊重。从历史上看,caudillos在塑造各种拉丁美洲国家的政治格局方面发挥了重要作用。例如,阿根廷的胡安·曼努埃尔·德·罗萨斯和墨西哥的波菲里奥·迪亚兹等人物体现了caudillos作为解放者和压迫者的双重性质。虽然他们常常通过承诺稳定和改革而掌握权力,但他们的专制倾向往往导致镇压异议和不平等的延续。caudillos的崛起可以归因于多种因素,包括殖民遗产、社会分层和中央政府的弱点。在摆脱殖民势力独立后,许多拉丁美洲国家在建立稳定政府方面苦苦挣扎,导致权力真空,通常被强人或军事领导人填补。这些caudillos利用民众的不满,把自己表现为人民抵御外来影响和内部混乱的保护者。除了政治角色外,caudillos还常常体现了男性气概和力量的文化理想。他们在文学和民间传说中经常被描绘为英雄人物,象征着对压迫的抵抗和民族身份的斗争。这种对caudillos的浪漫化对许多拉丁美洲社会的集体记忆和身份产生了持久的影响。然而,caudillos的遗产是复杂的。虽然一些人因其在国家建设和社会变革中的贡献而被铭记,但其他人则因其残暴的手段和对民主原则的漠视而受到批评。caudillos现象引发了关于领导力、权威和社会权力本质的重要问题。它挑战我们思考历史人物是如何构建和被记住的,以及我们可以从他们的成功与失败中汲取哪些教训。在当代讨论中,“caudillos”一词有时用来描述那些表现出类似专制和民粹主义特征的现代领导人。随着政治格局的不断演变,与caudillos相关的特征仍然具有现实意义,引发了关于权力与民主之间平衡的持续辩论。理解caudillos的历史背景和影响对于分析拉丁美洲及其他地区当前的政治动态至关重要。总之,“caudillos”的概念为我们提供了一个透视拉丁美洲领导力和治理复杂性的视角。通过研究这些人物的崛起与衰落,我们能够深入了解社会在应对权力、身份和社会正义问题时所面临的持久挑战。无论是作为英雄还是反派,caudillos的遗产继续塑造该地区的政治话语和文化叙事,提醒我们历史与当代社会之间错综复杂的相互关系。