leukotomies

简明释义

英[ljuːˈkɒtəmɪ]美[lʊˈkɑtəmi]

n. [外科] 脑白质切断术，前额脑叶切除手术

复 数 l e u k o t o m i e s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.In the past, leukotomies 白质切除术 were a common procedure for patients with depression.

在过去，leukotomies 白质切除术 是治疗抑郁症患者的一种常见手术。

2.The surgeon explained that leukotomies 白质切除术 are often used to treat severe mental disorders.

外科医生解释说，leukotomies 白质切除术 通常用于治疗严重的心理障碍。

3.The effectiveness of leukotomies 白质切除术 has been debated among medical professionals.

医疗专业人士对 leukotomies 白质切除术 的有效性进行了辩论。

4.Some patients reported significant changes in behavior after undergoing leukotomies 白质切除术.

一些患者在接受 leukotomies 白质切除术 后报告了行为上的显著变化。

5.Modern psychiatry has largely moved away from leukotomies 白质切除术 in favor of medication and therapy.

现代精神病学在很大程度上已放弃 leukotomies 白质切除术，转而采用药物和治疗。

作文

In the field of neuroscience, various surgical procedures have been developed to treat severe mental health disorders. One such procedure is known as leukotomies, which refers to a type of brain surgery that involves cutting or removing parts of the white matter in the brain. This technique was once commonly used to manage conditions like schizophrenia and severe depression when other treatments failed. However, the historical context of leukotomies reveals a complex and often controversial legacy.The practice of leukotomies gained prominence in the mid-20th century, particularly after the introduction of the lobotomy, a similar but more invasive procedure. Surgeons believed that by severing connections within the brain, they could alleviate the symptoms of debilitating mental illnesses. Initial reports indicated that some patients experienced relief from their symptoms, leading to a wave of enthusiasm for this surgical intervention.However, as time progressed, the shortcomings of leukotomies became increasingly apparent. Many patients suffered severe side effects, including cognitive impairments, personality changes, and emotional blunting. The lack of informed consent and the ethical implications of performing such drastic surgeries on vulnerable individuals sparked significant debate within the medical community and among the public.In light of these concerns, the use of leukotomies has dramatically declined since the 1970s, giving way to more humane and effective treatments for mental health disorders. Psychopharmacology, psychotherapy, and newer modalities like deep brain stimulation have emerged as safer alternatives. These advancements highlight the importance of ongoing research and the need for ethical considerations in medical practices.Despite its controversial past, the study of leukotomies provides valuable insights into the evolution of psychiatric treatment. It serves as a reminder of the necessity for rigorous scientific evaluation and ethical responsibility in the pursuit of effective therapies. Understanding the history of such procedures can help inform current practices and guide future innovations in mental health treatment.In conclusion, while leukotomies were once viewed as a promising solution for severe mental health issues, they ultimately highlighted the complexities of treating the human mind. As we continue to advance in our understanding of neuroscience and mental health, it is crucial to learn from past mistakes and prioritize patient welfare above all else. The legacy of leukotomies reminds us that compassion and ethics must always accompany medical innovation, ensuring that we strive for treatments that respect the dignity and autonomy of individuals seeking help.

在神经科学领域，已经开发出各种外科手术来治疗严重的心理健康障碍。其中一种手术被称为白质切除术，指的是一种脑部手术，涉及切割或移除大脑的白质部分。这种技术曾被广泛用于管理如精神分裂症和重度抑郁症等疾病，当其他治疗方法失败时。然而，白质切除术的历史背景揭示了一个复杂且常常有争议的遗产。白质切除术在20世纪中叶变得流行，特别是在引入脑叶切除术（lobotomy）后，这是一种类似但更具侵入性的手术。外科医生认为，通过切断大脑内的连接，他们可以减轻严重心理疾病的症状。最初的报告显示，一些患者的症状有所缓解，这导致了对这种外科干预的热情浪潮。然而，随着时间的推移，白质切除术的缺点愈发明显。许多患者遭受严重的副作用，包括认知障碍、人格变化和情感迟钝。缺乏知情同意以及在脆弱个体身上进行如此激烈手术的伦理问题引发了医学界和公众之间的重大辩论。鉴于这些担忧，自1970年代以来，白质切除术的使用显著减少，取而代之的是更人性化和有效的心理健康治疗方法。精神药理学、心理治疗以及深脑刺激等新型治疗方式已经成为更安全的替代方案。这些进展突显了持续研究的重要性以及在医疗实践中需要考虑的伦理问题。尽管有争议的过去，白质切除术的研究提供了对精神病治疗演变的宝贵见解。它提醒我们，在追求有效疗法的过程中，必须进行严格的科学评估和伦理责任。理解此类程序的历史可以帮助指导当前的实践，并引导未来的心理健康治疗创新。总之，虽然白质切除术曾被视为严重心理健康问题的有希望的解决方案，但最终突显了治疗人类心灵的复杂性。随着我们在神经科学和心理健康方面的理解不断深入，学习过去的错误并优先考虑患者福祉至关重要。白质切除术的遗产提醒我们，医药创新必须始终伴随同情和伦理，确保我们追求尊重寻求帮助的个体尊严和自主权的治疗。