compulsory sanction

简明释义

强制性制裁

英英释义

例句

1.In international relations, a compulsory sanction can be used to deter aggressive behavior by a nation.

在国际关系中，强制制裁可以用来威慑一个国家的侵略行为。

2.Failure to pay taxes may result in a compulsory sanction from the tax authorities.

未能缴纳税款可能会导致税务机关的强制制裁。

3.The sports federation announced a compulsory sanction against any athlete caught using performance-enhancing drugs.

体育联合会宣布对任何被发现使用兴奋剂的运动员实施强制制裁。

4.The school has a compulsory sanction policy for students caught cheating on exams.

学校对考试作弊的学生有一项强制制裁政策。

5.The government imposed a compulsory sanction on companies that fail to comply with environmental regulations.

政府对未能遵守环境法规的公司施加了强制制裁。

作文

In the realm of international relations, the concept of compulsory sanction (强制制裁) plays a pivotal role in maintaining global order and addressing violations of international law. A compulsory sanction is typically imposed by a governing body, such as the United Nations, to enforce compliance with international norms and standards. These sanctions can take various forms, including economic restrictions, trade embargoes, or even military interventions, aimed at compelling a state or entity to alter its behavior. The rationale behind implementing compulsory sanctions is often rooted in the need to protect human rights, prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, and uphold peace and security. For instance, when a nation engages in aggressive actions against another state or violates human rights on a large scale, the international community may respond with compulsory sanctions to pressure the offending party into compliance. This collective action is essential, as it demonstrates a unified stance against unacceptable behavior and reinforces the principles of international law.However, the effectiveness of compulsory sanctions is a topic of considerable debate among scholars and policymakers. Critics argue that such measures can have unintended consequences, often harming the civilian population more than the intended target. For example, economic sanctions may lead to shortages of essential goods, exacerbating poverty and suffering for ordinary citizens while the political elite remain largely unaffected. This raises ethical questions about the use of compulsory sanctions and whether they truly achieve their intended goals.Moreover, the implementation of compulsory sanctions can sometimes lead to further entrenchment of the sanctioned regime. Rather than fostering compliance, sanctions can provoke a rally-around-the-flag effect, where the population unites against perceived external threats. This phenomenon can strengthen the resolve of the leadership, making them less likely to concede to international demands. Therefore, it is crucial for the international community to consider the broader implications of imposing compulsory sanctions and to explore alternative strategies that might yield better results.In addition to these challenges, the process of enforcing compulsory sanctions can be complicated by geopolitical considerations. Nations may have differing interests and priorities, leading to inconsistencies in the application of sanctions. For instance, a country may choose to ignore or even support a sanctioned state due to economic ties or strategic alliances, undermining the overall effectiveness of the sanctions regime. This highlights the importance of international cooperation and consensus when it comes to implementing compulsory sanctions.In conclusion, while compulsory sanctions serve as a tool for the international community to address violations of law and promote accountability, their effectiveness and ethical implications warrant careful consideration. Policymakers must weigh the potential benefits against the risks of exacerbating humanitarian crises and reinforcing authoritarian regimes. As global challenges continue to evolve, so too must our approaches to governance and international relations, ensuring that measures like compulsory sanctions are used judiciously and in conjunction with other diplomatic efforts to foster lasting peace and stability.

在国际关系领域，compulsory sanction（强制制裁）的概念在维护全球秩序和应对国际法违反方面发挥着关键作用。compulsory sanction通常由一个治理机构（如联合国）施加，以强制遵守国际规范和标准。这些制裁可以采取多种形式，包括经济限制、贸易禁运甚至军事干预，旨在迫使一个国家或实体改变其行为。实施compulsory sanctions的理由通常根植于保护人权、防止大规模杀伤性武器扩散以及维护和平与安全的需要。例如，当一个国家对另一个国家采取侵略行动或大规模侵犯人权时，国际社会可能会通过compulsory sanctions来施压违规方以促使其遵守。这种集体行动至关重要，因为它表明了对不可接受行为的统一立场，并强化了国际法的原则。然而，compulsory sanctions的有效性是学者和政策制定者之间广泛争论的话题。批评者认为，这些措施可能会产生意想不到的后果，往往对平民人口造成的伤害超过了对目标的影响。例如，经济制裁可能导致基本商品短缺，加剧普通公民的贫困和痛苦，而政治精英则几乎不受影响。这引发了关于使用compulsory sanctions的伦理问题，以及它们是否真正实现了预期目标。此外，实施compulsory sanctions有时可能导致被制裁政权的进一步巩固。制裁不一定促进合规，反而可能引发一种团结一致的效应，民众团结起来反对外部威胁。这种现象可能会增强领导层的决心，使他们更不可能屈服于国际要求。因此，国际社会必须考虑实施compulsory sanctions的更广泛影响，并探索可能产生更好结果的替代策略。除了这些挑战之外，执行compulsory sanctions的过程可能因地缘政治因素而复杂化。各国可能有不同的利益和优先事项，导致制裁实施的不一致。例如，一个国家可能选择忽视或甚至支持一个被制裁的国家，出于经济联系或战略联盟的考虑，从而削弱制裁制度的整体有效性。这突显了国际合作和共识在实施compulsory sanctions时的重要性。总之，尽管compulsory sanctions作为国际社会应对法律违反和促进问责的工具，但其有效性和伦理影响值得仔细考虑。政策制定者必须权衡潜在的好处与加剧人道危机和强化专制政权的风险。随着全球挑战的不断演变，我们的治理和国际关系方法也必须随之发展，确保像compulsory sanctions这样的措施得到谨慎使用，并与其他外交努力相结合，以促进持久的和平与稳定。