compulsory judicial sttlement

简明释义

强制司法解决

英英释义

例句

1.The new policy requires all labor disputes to undergo compulsory judicial settlement (强制司法解决) before any strikes can occur.

新政策要求所有劳动争议在发生罢工之前必须经过强制司法解决（强制司法解决）。

2.Parties involved in the dispute were required to submit to compulsory judicial settlement (强制司法解决) as per the arbitration agreement.

根据仲裁协议，争议各方被要求接受强制司法解决（强制司法解决）。

3.In international law, countries often agree to compulsory judicial settlement (强制司法解决) to avoid prolonged conflicts.

在国际法中，各国通常同意进行强制司法解决（强制司法解决）以避免长期冲突。

4.The court emphasized the importance of compulsory judicial settlement (强制司法解决) in maintaining order and justice.

法院强调了强制司法解决（强制司法解决）在维护秩序和正义中的重要性。

5.The contract stipulates that any disputes must be resolved through compulsory judicial settlement (强制司法解决) to ensure fairness.

该合同规定，任何争议必须通过强制司法解决（强制司法解决）来确保公正。

作文

The concept of compulsory judicial settlement refers to a mandatory process through which disputes are resolved by a court or legal authority. This mechanism is significant in international law, particularly in the resolution of conflicts between states. When nations face disagreements that they cannot settle through negotiation or diplomacy, they may turn to the compulsory judicial settlement system to seek a binding resolution. This process ensures that both parties adhere to the decision made by the judicial body, thereby promoting peace and stability in international relations. One of the primary advantages of compulsory judicial settlement is that it provides a formalized framework for resolving disputes. Without such a system, countries might resort to unilateral actions, which could escalate tensions and lead to conflict. By agreeing to submit their cases to a judicial authority, states demonstrate their commitment to upholding international law and order. For instance, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) serves as a crucial platform for compulsory judicial settlement, where various nations have brought their disputes for adjudication. The ICJ's rulings are legally binding, which adds a layer of accountability for the involved parties.Moreover, compulsory judicial settlement can enhance diplomatic relations among nations. When countries agree to resolve their issues through judicial means, it often indicates a willingness to engage in dialogue and cooperation. This approach can lead to improved relations, as states recognize that they can resolve their differences without resorting to force. Additionally, the transparency of judicial proceedings can foster trust among nations, as the process is open to scrutiny and public observation.However, there are challenges associated with compulsory judicial settlement. One major issue is the enforcement of judicial decisions. While a ruling from a court like the ICJ is binding, there is no overarching authority to ensure compliance. This can lead to situations where one party fails to adhere to the court's decision, undermining the effectiveness of the judicial settlement process. Consequently, the reliance on voluntary compliance can be problematic, especially when national interests are at stake.Furthermore, the compulsory judicial settlement process can be time-consuming and costly. Nations may find themselves engaged in lengthy legal battles, which can drain resources and delay the resolution of pressing issues. In some cases, this prolonged process can exacerbate tensions rather than alleviate them. Therefore, while the idea of compulsory judicial resolution is appealing, practical considerations must also be taken into account.In conclusion, compulsory judicial settlement plays a vital role in maintaining international peace and security by providing a structured method for resolving disputes. It promotes adherence to the rule of law and fosters diplomatic relations among nations. However, the challenges of enforcement and the potential for drawn-out proceedings highlight the need for continuous improvement in the system. As global interdependence grows, the importance of effective dispute resolution mechanisms like compulsory judicial settlement will only increase, making it essential for nations to commit to this process for a more peaceful world.

“强制司法解决”这一概念是指通过法院或法律机构解决争端的强制性过程。该机制在国际法中具有重要意义，特别是在国家间冲突的解决上。当国家面临无法通过谈判或外交解决的分歧时，它们可能会转向“强制司法解决”系统寻求具有约束力的裁决。这个过程确保双方遵守司法机构作出的决定，从而促进国际关系的和平与稳定。“强制司法解决”的主要优点之一是提供了一个规范化的争端解决框架。如果没有这样一个系统，各国可能会诉诸单方面行动，这可能加剧紧张局势并导致冲突。通过同意将案件提交给司法机构，各国展示了其维护国际法和秩序的承诺。例如，国际法院（ICJ）作为“强制司法解决”的重要平台，各国在此提出争端请求裁决。国际法院的裁决具有法律约束力，这为相关方增加了一层责任感。此外，“强制司法解决”还可以增强国家之间的外交关系。当国家同意通过司法手段解决问题时，通常表明它们愿意进行对话与合作。这种方式可以改善关系，因为各国认识到可以在不诉诸武力的情况下解决分歧。此外，司法程序的透明性可以促进国家之间的信任，因为这一过程是公开接受审查和公众观察的。然而，“强制司法解决”也面临挑战。其中一个主要问题是司法决定的执行。尽管像国际法院这样的法院的裁决是有约束力的，但没有一个超然的权威来确保遵守。这可能导致一方未能遵守法院决定的情况，从而削弱司法解决过程的有效性。因此，对自愿遵守的依赖可能会带来问题，尤其是在国家利益受到影响时。此外，“强制司法解决”过程可能耗时且成本高昂。各国可能发现自己陷入漫长的法律斗争中，这可能消耗资源并延迟紧迫问题的解决。在某些情况下，这一漫长的过程可能加剧紧张局势，而不是缓解它。因此，尽管强制司法解决的想法令人向往，但也必须考虑实际因素。总之，“强制司法解决”在维护国际和平与安全方面发挥着至关重要的作用，为争端提供了结构化的解决方法。它促进了对法治的遵守，并在国家之间培养了外交关系。然而，执行的挑战和潜在的冗长程序突显了对系统持续改进的需求。随着全球相互依存的加剧，有效争端解决机制如“强制司法解决”的重要性只会增加，因此，各国必须致力于这一过程，以实现更和平的世界。