blood money

简明释义

等待金

英英释义

例句

1.The journalist exposed the scandal involving blood money paid to silence witnesses.

这位记者揭露了涉及支付血钱以封口证人的丑闻。

2.Many believe that accepting blood money from the government only deepens the wounds of loss.

许多人认为，接受政府的血钱只会加深失去的创伤。

3.He felt guilty for taking blood money after the assassination.

在暗杀之后，他为拿到血钱感到内疚。

4.The community was outraged when they found out the charity was funded by blood money.

当社区发现该慈善机构是由血钱资助时，愤怒不已。

5.After the tragic accident, the company offered a large sum as blood money to the victim's family.

在这场悲惨的事故后，公司向受害者的家属提供了一笔巨款作为血钱。

作文

The term blood money refers to the compensation or payment made to the family of a murder victim, often seen as a way to absolve the perpetrator of guilt. This concept has deep roots in various cultures and legal systems, where it is sometimes perceived as a means of seeking justice, while in other instances, it is viewed as a morally reprehensible act that commodifies human life. In many societies, the idea of blood money raises significant ethical questions about the value of life and the implications of financial compensation for violent acts.Historically, blood money has been used in different contexts. In ancient tribal societies, for example, the practice of paying a sum to the victim's family was common as a way to prevent further bloodshed and maintain peace within the community. This form of restitution aimed to balance the scales of justice, allowing the offender to avoid retribution while providing some form of closure to the victim's family. However, as societies evolved, the concept of blood money became more complex.In modern times, the implications of blood money extend beyond mere financial transactions. It raises questions about the adequacy of monetary compensation in addressing the profound emotional and psychological trauma experienced by victims' families. Can a sum of money truly compensate for the loss of a loved one? Many argue that it cannot, and that the notion of blood money trivializes the gravity of homicide and the suffering it causes.Moreover, the acceptance of blood money can lead to a dangerous precedent where monetary payments are seen as a viable solution to violent crimes. This could potentially encourage offenders to commit heinous acts, knowing they can simply pay off the victim's family. Such a perspective undermines the fundamental principles of justice and accountability. Instead of facing the consequences of their actions, perpetrators may find a way to escape true punishment through financial means.Additionally, the concept of blood money varies significantly across cultures. In some countries, it is legally recognized and integrated into the judicial system, while in others, it is strictly forbidden and viewed as a form of bribery or corruption. For instance, in certain Middle Eastern cultures, blood money is an accepted practice, often negotiated between families to achieve a sense of resolution. Conversely, in Western legal systems, such practices are generally rejected, with a stronger emphasis placed on criminal prosecution and incarceration.In conclusion, the term blood money encapsulates a complex interplay between morality, justice, and cultural practices. While it can serve as a mechanism for reconciliation in some societies, it also poses significant ethical dilemmas regarding the commodification of life and the adequacy of financial compensation for loss. As we navigate the challenges of violence and crime in our world, it is crucial to reflect on the implications of blood money and strive for a justice system that honors the value of life rather than reducing it to a mere monetary figure.

“血钱”一词指的是对谋杀受害者家属的赔偿或支付，常常被视为使施害者免于内疚的一种方式。这个概念在各种文化和法律体系中有着深厚的根基，有时被视为寻求正义的手段，而在其他情况下，则被视为一种道德上令人厌恶的行为，商品化人类生命。在许多社会中，“血钱”的概念引发了关于生命价值和暴力行为财务补偿影响的重要伦理问题。历史上，“血钱”在不同的背景下被使用。例如，在古代部落社会中，向受害者家属支付一定金额的做法很常见，目的是防止进一步的流血事件，并维持社区内的和平。这种形式的赔偿旨在平衡正义的天平，使施害者能够避免报复，同时为受害者的家庭提供某种形式的 closure。然而，随着社会的发展，“血钱”的概念变得更加复杂。在现代，“血钱”的含义超越了简单的财务交易。它引发了关于金钱补偿是否足以解决受害者家庭所经历的深刻情感和心理创伤的问题。一笔钱真的能补偿失去亲人的痛苦吗？许多人认为不能，并且认为“血钱”的概念使得谋杀的严重性及其带来的痛苦变得微不足道。此外，接受“血钱”可能会导致一种危险的先例，即将金钱支付视为暴力犯罪的可行解决方案。这可能会鼓励施害者实施可怕的行为，因为他们知道可以通过支付受害者家庭来逃避真正的惩罚。这种观点削弱了正义和问责制的基本原则。施害者不必面对自己行为的后果，而是可以通过财务手段找到逃避的方式。此外，“血钱”的概念在不同文化中差异显著。在一些国家，它被法律认可并纳入司法系统，而在其他国家，它则被严格禁止，被视为贿赂或腐败的形式。例如，在某些中东文化中，“血钱”是一种被接受的做法，通常在家庭之间进行协商，以实现某种形式的和解。相反，在西方法律体系中，这种做法一般被拒绝，更加强调刑事起诉和监禁。总之，术语“血钱”包含了道德、正义和文化实践之间复杂的相互作用。虽然在某些社会中它可以作为和解的机制，但它也提出了关于生命商品化和金钱补偿失去的充分性的重大伦理困境。在我们应对世界中的暴力和犯罪挑战时，反思“血钱”的含义并努力追求一个尊重生命价值的司法系统至关重要，而不是将其简化为一个单纯的货币数字。