vigilantism

简明释义

英[ˌvɪdʒɪˈlæntɪzəm]美[ˌvɪdʒɪˈlæntɪzəm]

n. （美）治安委员会的政策

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Pasik said the project is part art, part reality show, part journalism and part fun. But it is definitely not vigilantism.

帕西克称这个计划是艺术、“真人秀”、新闻报道和娱乐的结合体，但肯定不是维护治安的手段。

2.As part of his maddened vigilantism, Durron ensured that another Sun Crusher would never be built by using the Force to tear all knowledge of the superweapon project from Qwi Xux's vulnerable mind.

作为其疯狂做法的一部分，达伦用原力将这项超级武器工程的所有知识从奎·克萨克斯的脆弱意识中抹去，以确保不会有另一艘“灭日者”出现。

3.But it is definitely not vigilantism.

但这当然不是推行强硬措施。

4.As part of his maddened vigilantism, Durron ensured that another Sun Crusher would never be built by using the Force to tear all knowledge of the superweapon project from Qwi Xux's vulnerable mind.

作为其疯狂做法的一部分，达伦用原力将这项超级武器工程的所有知识从奎·克萨克斯的脆弱意识中抹去，以确保不会有另一艘“灭日者”出现。

5.The film portrays a hero who engages in vigilantism to protect his neighborhood.

这部电影描绘了一位为保护自己社区而进行自力救济的英雄。

6.Critics argue that vigilantism undermines the rule of law.

批评者认为自力救济破坏了法治。

7.The rise of vigilantism has sparked debates about the effectiveness of the legal system.

自力救济的兴起引发了关于法律系统有效性的辩论。

8.Many communities have turned to vigilantism in response to rising crime rates.

许多社区因犯罪率上升而转向自力救济。

9.In some cases, vigilantism has led to tragic consequences.

在某些情况下，自力救济导致了悲惨的后果。

作文

Vigilantism is a complex and often controversial phenomenon that arises when individuals or groups take the law into their own hands, bypassing the established legal system to enforce what they perceive as justice. This practice can be seen in various forms across different societies, often fueled by a sense of frustration with the authorities' inability to maintain order or protect citizens. While some may view vigilantism (私刑) as a necessary response to crime, others argue that it undermines the rule of law and can lead to further violence and chaos.Historically, vigilantism (私刑) has taken root in communities where law enforcement is either absent or ineffective. For instance, during the Wild West era in the United States, vigilante groups emerged to combat rampant lawlessness. These groups often operated outside the legal framework, using their own methods to punish wrongdoers. While they may have provided a temporary solution to immediate threats, their actions often resulted in tragic consequences, including wrongful accusations and extrajudicial killings.In contemporary society, the rise of social media and digital communication has given birth to a new form of vigilantism (私刑). Online platforms allow individuals to share information about alleged criminals, sometimes leading to public shaming or harassment. This digital vigilantism can escalate quickly, as mob mentality takes over, resulting in serious repercussions for those targeted. The case of online witch hunts illustrates how quickly a person's life can be turned upside down based on unverified claims, raising ethical questions about justice and accountability.Supporters of vigilantism (私刑) often argue that it serves as a check on the system, especially in cases where the legal system fails to deliver justice. They believe that when law enforcement agencies are corrupt or ineffective, individuals have the right to protect themselves and their communities. However, this perspective overlooks the potential dangers of taking justice into one's own hands. Without proper oversight and due process, vigilantism (私刑) can devolve into mob rule, where the innocent may suffer alongside the guilty.Moreover, vigilantism (私刑) can create a cycle of violence that is difficult to break. When individuals resort to extralegal measures, it often leads to retaliation from those who feel wronged. This cycle can perpetuate fear and instability within communities, making it harder for legitimate law enforcement to restore order. Instead of fostering a sense of security, vigilantism (私刑) can breed distrust among neighbors and erode the social fabric that holds communities together.In conclusion, while vigilantism (私刑) may arise from genuine concerns about safety and justice, it poses significant risks to society. It challenges the principles of due process and the rule of law, ultimately threatening the very fabric of a civil society. As we navigate the complexities of justice in our communities, it is crucial to find ways to address grievances without resorting to vigilantism (私刑). Building trust in law enforcement and ensuring that the legal system is accessible and equitable are essential steps toward creating a safer and more just society for all.

私刑是一种复杂且常常具争议的现象，当个人或团体将法律掌握在自己手中，绕过既定的法律体系来执行他们所认为的正义时，就会出现这种情况。这种做法在不同社会中以各种形式存在，通常是由于对当局无法维持秩序或保护公民的挫败感而引发的。虽然一些人可能将私刑视为对犯罪的必要回应，但另一些人则认为这会破坏法治，并可能导致进一步的暴力和混乱。历史上，私刑在法律执法缺失或无效的社区扎根。例如，在美国的西部拓荒时代，出现了自发的维权团体，以应对猖獗的无序。这些团体通常在法律框架之外运作，使用自己的方法惩罚罪犯。虽然他们可能提供了对即时威胁的暂时解决方案，但他们的行为往往导致悲惨后果，包括错误指控和法外处决。在当代社会，社交媒体和数字通信的兴起催生了一种新的私刑形式。在线平台允许个人分享关于涉嫌犯罪者的信息，有时导致公众羞辱或骚扰。这种数字私刑可以迅速升级，因为群体心态占据上风，导致目标受到严重后果。网络猎巫事件的案例说明了一个人的生活如何因未经验证的指控而迅速颠覆，引发了关于正义和问责的伦理问题。私刑的支持者常常辩称，这在法律制度未能提供正义的情况下充当了一种制衡，认为当执法机构腐败或无效时，个人有权保护自己和他们的社区。然而，这种观点忽视了将正义掌握在自己手中的潜在危险。如果没有适当的监督和正当程序，私刑可能沦为暴民统治，清白的人可能与有罪的人一起遭受苦难。此外，私刑可能会造成一个难以打破的暴力循环。当个人诉诸于法外措施时，通常会导致那些感到被冤屈的人的报复。这种循环可以在社区内滋生恐惧和不稳定，使合法执法更难恢复秩序。相反，私刑可能滋生邻里之间的不信任，侵蚀维系社区团结的社会结构。总之，虽然私刑可能源于对安全和正义的真正关切，但它对社会构成重大风险。它挑战了正当程序和法治的原则，最终威胁到文明社会的基础。在我们在社区中应对正义的复杂性时，找到解决不满情绪而不诉诸于私刑的方法至关重要。建立对执法的信任，并确保法律体系可接近且公平，是创造一个更安全、更公正的社会的基本步骤。