bias bleeder

简明释义

偏压分泄电阻

英英释义

例句

1.His reputation suffered because he was seen as a bias bleeder 偏见流露者 during discussions.

因为他在讨论中被视为一个偏见流露者，他的声誉受到了损害。

2.As a journalist, it's important not to be a bias bleeder 偏见流露者 in your reporting.

作为一名记者，在报道中不成为一个偏见流露者是很重要的。

3.If you want to be an effective leader, avoid being a bias bleeder 偏见流露者 and listen to all opinions.

如果你想成为一个有效的领导者，避免成为一个偏见流露者，倾听所有意见。

4.During the meeting, Sarah's comments revealed her as a bias bleeder 偏见流露者 who favored one side of the project.

在会议期间，萨拉的评论暴露了她作为一个偏见流露者，偏爱项目的一方。

5.In a heated debate, John became a bias bleeder 偏见流露者, unable to see any perspective other than his own.

在一场激烈的辩论中，约翰成为了一个偏见流露者，无法看到任何与自己不同的观点。

作文

In today's world, the concept of bias is prevalent in various aspects of life, from media representation to personal interactions. One term that has emerged in discussions about bias is bias bleeder, which refers to individuals or entities that exhibit a strong inclination towards a particular perspective, often at the expense of objectivity. Understanding this term can help us navigate the complexities of modern communication and foster more balanced viewpoints.The term bias bleeder can be broken down into two parts: 'bias' and 'bleeder.' Bias refers to a predisposition or prejudice in favor of or against something, often leading to unfair treatment or judgment. On the other hand, the word 'bleeder' suggests an ongoing process of leaking or spilling out. When we combine these two concepts, we get a vivid image of someone who is not only biased but also unable to contain or manage their biases effectively, allowing them to seep into their thoughts and actions.In various fields such as journalism, politics, and academia, being a bias bleeder can have significant implications. For instance, journalists are expected to report the news objectively. However, when they become bias bleeders, their personal beliefs and preferences may distort the facts, leading to misinformation and a lack of trust among the audience. This phenomenon can create echo chambers where only certain viewpoints are amplified, while others are marginalized.Moreover, in the realm of social media, the rise of influencers and content creators has led to a new breed of bias bleeders. These individuals often cultivate a following by expressing strong opinions and emotions, which can resonate with their audience. While this can foster community and engagement, it can also perpetuate divisive narratives and reinforce existing biases. As consumers of media, it is crucial for us to recognize when we are engaging with bias bleeders and to seek out diverse perspectives to counterbalance those influences.The impact of being a bias bleeder extends beyond just individual interactions; it can affect societal discourse as a whole. When public figures or institutions exhibit clear biases, it can lead to polarization within communities. People may feel compelled to take sides, further entrenching their beliefs and making it difficult to engage in constructive dialogue. This polarization can hinder progress on important issues, as collaboration and compromise become increasingly challenging.To combat the effects of bias bleeder behavior, it is essential to cultivate critical thinking skills and promote media literacy. By encouraging individuals to question sources, analyze information critically, and engage with opposing viewpoints, we can create a more informed society. Educational institutions play a vital role in this process, equipping students with the tools necessary to navigate a world filled with biases.In conclusion, the term bias bleeder encapsulates a critical issue in our contemporary society. By understanding what it means to be a bias bleeder, we can better recognize the influence of biases in our lives and strive for a more balanced and inclusive dialogue. It is our responsibility to challenge our own biases and seek out diverse perspectives, ultimately fostering a healthier discourse in our communities.

在当今世界，偏见的概念在生活的各个方面普遍存在，从媒体表现到个人互动。一个在关于偏见的讨论中出现的术语是偏见流血者，它指的是那些表现出强烈倾向于某种特定观点的个人或实体，通常以牺牲客观性为代价。理解这个术语可以帮助我们驾驭现代沟通的复杂性，并培养更平衡的观点。术语偏见流血者可以分解为两个部分：'偏见'和'流血者'。偏见指的是对某事物的倾向或偏见，往往导致不公平的对待或判断。另一方面，'流血者'一词暗示着一种持续泄漏或溢出的过程。当我们将这两个概念结合起来时，我们得到一个生动的形象，即某人不仅有偏见，而且无法有效地控制或管理他们的偏见，使其渗透到他们的思想和行为中。在新闻、政治和学术等各种领域，成为偏见流血者可能会产生重大影响。例如，记者被期望客观报道新闻。然而，当他们成为偏见流血者时，他们的个人信念和偏好可能会扭曲事实，导致误导信息和观众之间缺乏信任。这种现象可能会创造出回音室，在这里，只有某些观点被放大，而其他观点被边缘化。此外，在社交媒体领域，影响者和内容创作者的崛起导致了新一代的偏见流血者。这些个人通常通过表达强烈的意见和情感来培养追随者，这可能与他们的观众产生共鸣。虽然这可以促进社区和参与，但也可能延续分裂的叙述并强化现有的偏见。作为媒体的消费者，我们必须认识到何时与偏见流血者互动，并寻求多样化的观点以抵消这些影响。成为偏见流血者的影响不仅限于个人互动；它还可能影响整个社会话语。当公共人物或机构表现出明显的偏见时，可能会导致社区内部的两极分化。人们可能感到被迫站队，进一步加深他们的信念，使得进行建设性的对话变得困难。这种两极分化可能会妨碍重要问题的进展，因为合作和妥协变得越来越具有挑战性。为了应对偏见流血者行为的影响，培养批判性思维技能和促进媒体素养至关重要。通过鼓励个人质疑来源、批判性分析信息和与对立观点互动，我们可以创造一个更具信息性的社会。教育机构在这一过程中发挥着至关重要的作用，为学生提供在充满偏见的世界中导航所需的工具。总之，术语偏见流血者概括了当代社会中的一个关键问题。通过理解成为偏见流血者的含义，我们可以更好地认识到偏见在我们生活中的影响，并努力实现更平衡和包容的对话。挑战我们自己的偏见并寻求多样化的观点，最终在我们的社区中促进更健康的对话是我们的责任。