automatic governing

简明释义

自动调节

英英释义

例句

1.The new software features automatic governing of user permissions, ensuring only authorized personnel have access.

新软件具有自动管理用户权限的功能，确保只有授权人员才能访问。

2.The factory implemented automatic governing to streamline production processes and reduce human error.

工厂实施了自动管理以简化生产流程并减少人为错误。

3.In smart homes, automatic governing systems adjust lighting and temperature based on occupancy.

在智能家居中，自动管理系统根据占用情况调整照明和温度。

4.The vehicle's automatic governing feature helps maintain a safe speed without driver intervention.

车辆的自动管理功能有助于在没有驾驶员干预的情况下保持安全速度。

5.With automatic governing, the network can dynamically allocate bandwidth based on usage patterns.

通过自动管理，网络可以根据使用模式动态分配带宽。

作文

In recent years, the concept of automatic governing has gained significant attention in various fields, particularly in governance and technology. Automatic governing refers to the use of automated systems and algorithms to manage and regulate processes without the need for human intervention. This approach aims to enhance efficiency, reduce errors, and streamline decision-making processes. As the world becomes increasingly complex and interconnected, the need for automatic governing is more pressing than ever.One of the most prominent examples of automatic governing can be seen in smart cities, where technology is integrated into urban management. For instance, traffic lights can be controlled by algorithms that analyze real-time traffic data, adjusting signal timings to optimize flow and reduce congestion. This not only improves transportation efficiency but also minimizes environmental impact by reducing idle times and emissions. In this context, automatic governing serves as a vital tool for enhancing urban living standards.Moreover, automatic governing can also be applied in the realm of public administration. Governments are increasingly adopting e-governance solutions, which utilize digital platforms to automate services such as tax collection, permit issuance, and citizen engagement. By implementing automatic governing, governments can provide faster, more transparent services to their citizens, ultimately fostering trust and improving public satisfaction.However, the rise of automatic governing also raises important ethical and practical concerns. One major issue is the potential for bias in automated systems. Algorithms are only as good as the data they are trained on, and if that data reflects existing biases, the outcomes may perpetuate inequality. For example, predictive policing algorithms have been criticized for disproportionately targeting marginalized communities based on flawed historical data. Therefore, it is crucial to ensure that automatic governing systems are designed with fairness and accountability in mind.Another concern is the loss of human oversight. While automation can improve efficiency, it is essential to maintain a balance between human judgment and machine decision-making. Relying too heavily on automatic governing could lead to situations where critical decisions are made without appropriate human input, potentially resulting in negative consequences. Thus, establishing clear guidelines for when and how to implement automatic governing is essential for safeguarding democratic values.In conclusion, automatic governing presents both opportunities and challenges. As we continue to explore the potential of automated systems in governance, it is vital to address the ethical implications and ensure that these technologies serve the public good. By striking the right balance between automation and human oversight, we can harness the benefits of automatic governing while mitigating its risks. Ultimately, the goal should be to create a more efficient, equitable, and transparent governance system that meets the needs of all citizens.

近年来，“自动治理”这一概念在各个领域受到广泛关注，特别是在治理和技术方面。“自动治理”指的是使用自动化系统和算法来管理和调节过程，而无需人类干预。这种方法旨在提高效率、减少错误并简化决策过程。随着世界变得越来越复杂和相互关联，对“自动治理”的需求比以往任何时候都更加紧迫。“自动治理”的一个显著例子可以在智能城市中看到，其中技术被整合到城市管理中。例如，交通信号灯可以由分析实时交通数据的算法控制，调整信号时长以优化流量并减少拥堵。这不仅提高了交通效率，还通过减少空转时间和排放来最小化环境影响。在这个背景下，“自动治理”作为增强城市生活标准的重要工具。此外，“自动治理”还可以应用于公共行政领域。各国政府越来越多地采用电子治理解决方案，利用数字平台自动化服务，例如税收征收、许可证发放和公民参与。通过实施“自动治理”，政府可以向公民提供更快速、更透明的服务，从而增强信任并提高公众满意度。然而，“自动治理”的兴起也引发了重要的伦理和实践问题。一个主要问题是自动化系统中潜在的偏见。算法的优劣取决于其训练的数据，如果这些数据反映了现有的偏见，结果可能会延续不平等。例如，预测性警务算法因基于有缺陷的历史数据而受到批评，导致对边缘化社区的过度打击。因此，确保“自动治理”系统的设计考虑公平性和问责制至关重要。另一个关注点是失去人类监督。虽然自动化可以提高效率，但保持人类判断与机器决策之间的平衡至关重要。过于依赖“自动治理”可能导致关键决策在没有适当人类输入的情况下做出，可能导致负面后果。因此，为何时以及如何实施“自动治理”建立明确的指导方针对于保护民主价值观至关重要。总之，“自动治理”既带来了机遇，也带来了挑战。随着我们继续探索自动化系统在治理中的潜力，解决伦理问题并确保这些技术服务于公共利益至关重要。通过在自动化和人类监督之间找到合适的平衡，我们可以利用“自动治理”的好处，同时减轻其风险。最终，目标应该是创建一个更高效、公平和透明的治理系统，以满足所有公民的需求。