jesuitical

简明释义

英[ˌdʒɛzʊˈɪtɪkəl]美[ˌdʒɛzʊˈɪtɪkəl]

adj. 虚伪的；阴险的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.It was a most philosophic and jesuitical motorman.

这是个十分善辩且狡猾的司机。

2.It was a mostphilosophic jesuitical motorman.

这是个十分善辩且狡猾的司机。

3.It was a most philosophic and jesuitical motorman.

这是个十分善辩且狡猾的司机。

4.The professor's lecture was filled with jesuitical nuances that left students perplexed.

教授的讲座充满了让学生困惑的耶稣会式细微差别。

5.In politics, jesuitical tactics are often employed to mislead the public.

在政治中，常常使用耶稣会式策略来误导公众。

6.She had a knack for jesuitical debates, always twisting words to her advantage.

她擅长耶稣会式辩论，总是把话语扭曲到对自己有利的方向。

7.His argument was so jesuitical that it seemed designed to confuse rather than clarify.

他的论点如此耶稣会式，似乎是为了混淆而不是澄清。

8.The lawyer's jesuitical reasoning made it difficult to determine the truth.

律师的耶稣会式推理使得真相难以确定。

作文

The term jesuitical refers to a style of reasoning that is often seen as cunning, subtle, and sometimes morally ambiguous. This word has its roots in the Jesuit order of the Catholic Church, which was known for its intellectual rigor and complex theological arguments. In contemporary discourse, calling someone’s argument jesuitical implies that it may be overly clever or sophisticated, potentially obscuring the truth rather than revealing it. In many debates, especially those involving ethics or morality, one might encounter jesuitical arguments that twist logic to serve a particular agenda. For instance, in political discussions, a politician might employ a jesuitical approach to justify a controversial policy by focusing on technicalities rather than the broader ethical implications. This can lead to confusion among the public, who may struggle to discern the underlying motivations behind such arguments.Moreover, the use of jesuitical reasoning can be particularly prevalent in legal contexts. Lawyers often have to navigate complex laws and regulations, and sometimes they may resort to jesuitical tactics to win a case. This could involve exploiting loopholes or presenting evidence in a way that misleads the jury. While this is a common practice in the legal profession, it raises significant ethical questions about the fairness of the justice system and the integrity of legal representatives.In literature, authors often depict characters who embody jesuitical qualities, using their intelligence to manipulate others. Such characters may be charming and articulate, yet their motives are often self-serving. This portrayal serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of excessive cleverness devoid of moral consideration. Readers are invited to reflect on the importance of honesty and transparency in communication, contrasting it with the deceptive allure of jesuitical reasoning.In personal relationships, the use of jesuitical language can be detrimental. When individuals engage in manipulative or overly complex arguments, it can erode trust and lead to misunderstandings. Clear and direct communication is vital for healthy relationships; therefore, relying on jesuitical tactics can ultimately backfire, causing more harm than good.In conclusion, while there may be situations where jesuitical reasoning appears effective, it is essential to recognize its potential pitfalls. Engaging in arguments that prioritize cleverness over clarity can obscure the truth and damage relationships. Striving for honesty and straightforwardness in our discussions, whether in politics, law, literature, or personal interactions, is crucial for fostering understanding and trust. As we navigate the complexities of communication, let us be wary of the seductive nature of jesuitical reasoning, and instead, aim for transparency and integrity in all our exchanges.

“jesuitical”这个词指的是一种常被视为狡猾、微妙且有时道德模糊的推理风格。这个词源于天主教的耶稣会，其以智力严谨和复杂的神学辩论而闻名。在当代话语中，称某人的论点为jesuitical意味着它可能过于聪明或复杂，可能掩盖真相而非揭示真相。在许多辩论中，尤其是涉及伦理或道德的辩论中，人们可能会遇到扭曲逻辑以服务特定议程的jesuitical论证。例如，在政治讨论中，政治家可能会采用jesuitical的方法来为一项有争议的政策辩护，通过关注细节而非更广泛的伦理影响。这可能导致公众困惑，他们可能难以辨别此类论证背后的动机。此外，jesuitical推理在法律背景中也尤为常见。律师常常需要驾驭复杂的法律法规，有时他们可能会诉诸于jesuitical策略来赢得案件。这可能涉及利用漏洞或以误导陪审团的方式呈现证据。尽管这在法律职业中是一种常见做法，但它引发了关于司法系统公平性和法律代表诚信的重要伦理问题。在文学作品中，作者常常描绘那些具备jesuitical特质的角色，利用他们的智慧操纵他人。这些角色可能迷人且口才出众，但他们的动机往往是自私的。这种描绘作为对过度聪明而缺乏道德考量的警示故事，邀请读者反思诚实和透明沟通的重要性，将其与jesuitical推理的欺骗魅力进行对比。在个人关系中，使用jesuitical语言可能会造成伤害。当个体参与操控或过于复杂的论证时，这可能会侵蚀信任并导致误解。清晰直接的沟通对健康关系至关重要；因此，依赖于jesuitical策略最终可能适得其反，造成更多伤害。总之，尽管在某些情况下，jesuitical推理似乎有效，但认识到其潜在的陷阱至关重要。在我们的讨论中，追求聪明而非清晰的论证可能会掩盖真相并损害关系。在政治、法律、文学或个人互动中，努力追求诚实和直截了当是促进理解和信任的关键。在我们应对沟通的复杂性时，让我们警惕jesuitical推理的诱惑，而是旨在所有交流中实现透明度和诚信。