platitudinous
简明释义
英[ˌplætɪˈtjuːdɪnəs]美[ˌplætɪˈtuːdənəs]
adj. 平凡的,陈腐的;陈词滥调的
英英释义
Lacking in originality or freshness; dull and tiresome due to overuse. | 缺乏原创性或新鲜感;由于过度使用而显得乏味和乏力。 |
单词用法
平庸的言论 | |
陈词滥调的演讲 | |
一个平淡无奇的陈述 | |
发表一个陈词滥调的评论 |
同义词
反义词
原创的 | Her original ideas brought a fresh perspective to the project. | 她的原创想法为项目带来了新鲜的视角。 | |
创新的 | The innovative approach of the team led to groundbreaking results. | 团队的创新方法导致了突破性的结果。 | |
独特的 | 他独特的风格使他与其他艺术家区分开来。 |
例句
1.His speech was filled with platitudinous remarks that failed to inspire the audience.
他的演讲充满了陈词滥调的言辞,未能激励听众。
2.The article was criticized for being overly platitudinous, lacking any original thought.
这篇文章因过于陈词滥调而受到批评,缺乏任何原创思想。
3.In a world full of platitudinous slogans, it's refreshing to hear something genuine.
在充满陈词滥调口号的世界里,听到一些真诚的话令人耳目一新。
4.The coach's platitudinous advice didn't motivate the players to perform better.
教练的陈词滥调建议并没有激励球员们表现得更好。
5.She rolled her eyes at his platitudinous comments about hard work and success.
她对他关于努力工作和成功的陈词滥调评论翻了个白眼。
作文
In today's fast-paced world, we often find ourselves bombarded with information and opinions from various sources. This overwhelming influx of data can lead to a phenomenon where certain ideas become so commonplace that they lose their significance. One such term that encapsulates this idea is platitudinous, which refers to remarks or statements that are dull, trite, or lacking in originality. These kinds of statements may sound familiar, but they do not offer any new insights or perspectives. Take, for instance, the frequent use of phrases like 'Everything happens for a reason' or 'Time heals all wounds.' While these sayings may provide comfort to some, they are often criticized for being platitudinous because they fail to address the complexities of human experiences. Instead of offering genuine understanding or support, they simply repeat what has already been said countless times before. In the realm of politics, platitudinous speeches are rampant. Politicians often resort to using clichéd phrases that resonate with the public but lack substance. For example, during election campaigns, candidates might say things like 'We need to come together as a nation' or 'Our best days are ahead of us.' While these statements may evoke a sense of unity or optimism, they often do not provide any concrete plans or solutions to the issues at hand. As a result, voters may feel disillusioned when they realize that these platitudinous remarks do little to address their concerns. Moreover, in personal conversations, we may find ourselves falling into the trap of using platitudinous language as well. When friends share their struggles, it can be tempting to respond with generic advice like 'Just stay positive' or 'Things will get better.' While our intentions may be good, such responses can come across as dismissive and unhelpful. Instead of acknowledging the individual's feelings and providing meaningful support, we risk trivializing their experiences with our platitudinous comments. To combat the prevalence of platitudinous language in our lives, it is essential to strive for authenticity and depth in our communication. We should aim to engage in conversations that challenge us to think critically and express our thoughts genuinely. By doing so, we can foster deeper connections with others and create an environment where original ideas can flourish. In conclusion, while platitudinous statements may offer a sense of familiarity and comfort, they often fall short of providing real value. Whether in politics, personal relationships, or everyday conversations, it is crucial to recognize the limitations of such language and seek to communicate in a way that is both meaningful and impactful. By moving beyond the platitudinous, we can enrich our discussions and contribute to a more thoughtful and engaged society.
在当今快节奏的世界中,我们常常发现自己受到来自各种来源的信息和意见的轰炸。这种信息的过载可能导致某些思想变得如此普遍,以至于失去了其重要性。一个能够很好地概括这一观点的术语是platitudinous,指的是那些乏味、陈腐或缺乏原创性的言论或声明。这类声明可能听起来耳熟能详,但并没有提供任何新的见解或视角。以“万事皆有因”或“时间会治愈一切伤痛”等短语为例。虽然这些说法可能给一些人带来安慰,但由于未能解决人类经历的复杂性,它们常常受到批评,被认为是platitudinous。这些说法没有提供真正的理解或支持,而是简单地重复了已经说过无数次的话。在政治领域,platitudinous演讲屡见不鲜。政治家们常常使用与公众产生共鸣但缺乏实质内容的陈词滥调。例如,在选举活动中,候选人可能会说“我们需要团结起来作为一个国家”或“我们最好的日子还在前面”。虽然这些声明可能唤起一种团结或乐观的感觉,但它们往往没有提供任何具体的计划或解决方案。因此,当选民意识到这些platitudinous言论对他们的关切几乎没有实际帮助时,可能会感到失望。此外,在个人对话中,我们也可能发现自己陷入使用platitudinous语言的陷阱。当朋友分享他们的挣扎时,回应像“保持积极”或“事情会好起来”的泛泛之谈可能很诱人。尽管我们的初衷可能是好的,但这样的回应可能显得轻率且无助。我们没有承认个体的感受,也没有提供有意义的支持,而是冒着用我们的platitudinous评论来淡化他们的经历的风险。为了应对我们生活中platitudinous语言的普遍存在,努力在交流中追求真实性和深度是至关重要的。我们应努力参与挑战我们思考的对话,并真诚地表达我们的想法。通过这样做,我们可以与他人建立更深的联系,并创造一个原创思想能够蓬勃发展的环境。总之,虽然platitudinous的言论可能提供一种熟悉和安慰感,但它们往往无法提供真正的价值。无论是在政治、个人关系还是日常对话中,认识到这种语言的局限性并寻求以有意义且影响力的方式进行交流是至关重要的。通过超越platitudinous,我们可以丰富我们的讨论,并为一个更加深思熟虑和参与的社会做出贡献。