anathematise

简明释义

英[ˌænəˈθɛmətaɪz]美[ˌænəˈθɛməˌtaɪz]

v. 诅咒；谴责；宣布将……革出教门

第 三 人 称 单 数 a n a t h e m a t i s e s

现 在 分 词 a n a t h e m a t i s i n g

过 去 式 a n a t h e m a t i s e d

过 去 分 词 a n a t h e m a t i s e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The church leaders decided to anathematise 诅咒 anyone who opposed their teachings.

教会领袖决定<施加诅咒>任何反对他们教义的人。

2.He was anathematised 被诅咒 for his heretical views on religion.

由于他对宗教的异端观点，他被<施加了诅咒>。

3.In his speech, he threatened to anathematise 诅咒 those who spread false rumors.

在他的演讲中，他威胁要<施加诅咒>那些传播谣言的人。

4.The council voted to anathematise 诅咒 the actions of the rogue member.

委员会投票决定<施加诅咒>这个叛徒成员的行为。

5.The community chose to anathematise 诅咒 any form of violence.

社区选择<施加诅咒>任何形式的暴力。

作文

Throughout history, the act of declaring someone or something as cursed or condemned has been a powerful tool used by various institutions, particularly religious ones. The term anathematise refers to this very act, which involves formally denouncing an individual or a belief system that is perceived as heretical or contrary to established doctrines. This practice can be traced back to ancient times when communities sought to maintain social order and cohesion through the exclusion of dissenting voices. In many cases, those who were anathematised faced severe consequences, including excommunication, social ostracism, or even violence.In the realm of religion, the concept of anathematise holds significant weight. For instance, during the Reformation, various factions within Christianity sought to anathematise their opponents to solidify their own beliefs and gain followers. The Catholic Church, for instance, often issued anathemas against Protestant reformers, branding them as heretics. This not only served to reinforce the authority of the Church but also instilled fear in the hearts of believers, as being anathematised meant being cut off from the spiritual community and the promise of salvation.However, the implications of anathematise extend beyond religious contexts. In politics, leaders and regimes have utilized similar tactics to suppress dissent and eliminate opposition. By anathematiseing political rivals, those in power can rally support from their base while delegitimizing alternative viewpoints. This can lead to a polarized society where dialogue and compromise are stifled, and individuals are forced to choose sides.Moreover, the modern world continues to witness the ramifications of anathematiseing in various forms, particularly on social media platforms. The phenomenon of cancel culture can be seen as a contemporary manifestation of this ancient practice. Individuals or groups that express unpopular opinions may find themselves anathematised by online communities, leading to public shaming and ostracization. While some argue that this serves as a necessary mechanism for holding people accountable, others contend that it stifles free speech and discourages open dialogue.The act of anathematiseing someone can also have profound psychological effects. Being publicly condemned can lead to feelings of isolation, shame, and despair. Those who are anathematised may struggle to rebuild their lives or reputations, as the stigma associated with being an outcast lingers long after the initial condemnation. This raises important questions about the ethics of anathematiseing individuals in any context. Is it ever justified to completely reject another person's beliefs or actions? Can we not find common ground, even with those we vehemently disagree with?In conclusion, the word anathematise encapsulates a complex and often troubling aspect of human interaction. Whether in religious, political, or social contexts, the act of condemning others can have far-reaching consequences. It serves as a reminder of the importance of compassion, understanding, and dialogue in an increasingly divided world. Instead of resorting to anathematiseing those who challenge our beliefs, we should strive to engage with them constructively, fostering a more inclusive and tolerant society. Only then can we hope to bridge the gaps that divide us and create a world where diverse perspectives are valued rather than vilified.

在历史上，宣布某人或某物被诅咒或谴责的行为一直是各种机构，尤其是宗教机构所使用的强大工具。术语anathematise指的正是这一行为，它涉及正式谴责一个被视为异端或与既定教义相悖的个人或信仰体系。这种做法可以追溯到古代，当时社区通过排除异议声音来维护社会秩序和凝聚力。在许多情况下，被anathematise的人面临严重后果，包括逐出教会、社会孤立甚至暴力。在宗教领域，anathematise的概念具有重要意义。例如，在宗教改革期间，基督教的各个派别试图anathematise他们的对手，以巩固自己的信仰并获得追随者。以天主教会为例，他们经常对新教改革者发出诅咒，将其标记为异端。这不仅有助于增强教会的权威，还在信徒心中植入恐惧，因为被anathematise意味着与精神共同体和救赎的承诺隔绝。然而，anathematise的影响超出了宗教背景。在政治上，领导者和政权利用类似的策略来压制异议和消灭反对派。通过anathematise政治对手，掌权者可以在其基础上团结支持，同时使替代观点失去合法性。这可能导致一个两极分化的社会，在这个社会中，对话和妥协受到压制，个人被迫选择立场。此外，现代世界仍然见证着各种形式的anathematise后果，特别是在社交媒体平台上。取消文化现象可以被视为这一古老实践的当代表现。表达不受欢迎意见的个人或群体可能会在网络社区中被anathematise，导致公众羞辱和孤立。虽然一些人认为这是一种对人们进行问责的必要机制，但另一些人则认为这压制了言论自由，阻碍了开放对话。anathematise某人的行为也可能对心理产生深远影响。被公开谴责可能导致孤立、羞耻和绝望的感觉。那些被anathematise的人可能会在重建生活或声誉时苦苦挣扎，因为与被驱逐者相关的污名在初次谴责后仍然挥之不去。这引发了关于在任何背景下anathematise个人伦理的重要问题。完全拒绝他人的信仰或行为是否总是合理？即使与我们强烈不同意的人，我们能否找到共同点？总之，词语anathematise封装了人际互动中复杂且常常令人不安的一个方面。无论是在宗教、政治还是社会背景下，谴责他人的行为都可能带来深远的后果。它提醒我们在日益分裂的世界中，理解、同情和对话的重要性。与其anathematise挑战我们信仰的人，我们应该努力与他们进行建设性的交流，促进一个更具包容性和宽容的社会。只有这样，我们才能希望弥合分歧，创造一个重视多元观点而非妖魔化的世界。