antitechnicality clause

简明释义

抵御市场波动条款

英英释义

例句

1.Implementing an antitechnicality clause can streamline the dispute resolution process significantly.

实施一个反技术性条款可以显著简化争议解决过程。

2.During the negotiation, both parties agreed on the importance of an antitechnicality clause for smoother execution.

在谈判中，双方一致同意在执行过程中加入一个反技术性条款的重要性。

3.The lawyer emphasized that the antitechnicality clause would protect clients from being penalized for trivial mistakes.

律师强调，反技术性条款将保护客户免受因琐碎错误而受到惩罚。

4.In public procurement, an antitechnicality clause ensures that bids are evaluated fairly, without getting caught up in technicalities.

在公共采购中，反技术性条款确保投标被公平评估，而不被技术细节所困扰。

5.The contract included an antitechnicality clause to prevent disputes over minor errors.

合同中包含了一个反技术性条款，以防止因小错误引发争议。

作文

In the realm of legal contracts, clarity and precision are paramount. However, the intricate nature of legal language often leads to misunderstandings and disputes between parties. To mitigate such issues, many contracts now include an antitechnicality clause, a provision designed to prevent one party from exploiting technicalities in the contract's wording. This clause serves as a safeguard, ensuring that the intentions of the parties involved are honored, even if minor errors or ambiguities exist in the document. The antitechnicality clause essentially states that the parties will not hold each other to strict interpretations of the contract’s terms if such interpretations could lead to unjust outcomes. For instance, if a contract specifies certain conditions for payment but contains a typographical error, the antitechnicality clause allows the parties to focus on the intended meaning rather than the flawed wording. This is particularly important in complex agreements where the stakes are high, and the consequences of misinterpretation can be severe.One of the primary benefits of including an antitechnicality clause in a contract is that it fosters a spirit of cooperation between the parties. Rather than approaching the contract as a battleground where every word is scrutinized for potential loopholes, the clause encourages a more collaborative mindset. Parties are more likely to resolve disputes amicably, focusing on the overall objectives of the agreement instead of getting bogged down by minor discrepancies.Moreover, the antitechnicality clause can save both time and resources. Legal battles over technicalities can be lengthy and costly, draining the financial and emotional resources of the parties involved. By incorporating this clause, parties can avoid protracted litigation and instead work towards mutually beneficial solutions. This efficiency is especially valuable in business contexts, where time is often equated with money.However, the inclusion of an antitechnicality clause is not without its critics. Some argue that it may lead to ambiguity in contract enforcement, as it introduces a degree of subjectivity into the interpretation of the contract. Critics contend that relying on such clauses can undermine the predictability and stability that well-defined contracts are meant to provide. They believe that parties should be held accountable for the precise language they use, as this promotes diligence and caution in drafting agreements.Despite these concerns, the growing trend towards adopting antitechnicality clauses reflects a broader shift in the legal landscape. As society becomes increasingly complex and interconnected, the need for flexibility in legal agreements has never been more apparent. Parties are recognizing that strict adherence to technical language can sometimes hinder justice and fairness, prompting them to embrace more pragmatic approaches.In conclusion, the antitechnicality clause represents a significant evolution in contract law, aiming to balance the need for precision with the realities of human error and interpretation. By allowing parties to focus on their true intentions rather than getting caught up in minor discrepancies, this clause enhances cooperation, saves resources, and ultimately promotes a more equitable legal environment. As we continue to navigate the complexities of modern agreements, it is likely that the antitechnicality clause will become an increasingly common feature in contracts across various sectors.

在法律合同的领域中，清晰和准确至关重要。然而，法律语言的复杂性常常导致当事人之间的误解和争议。为了减轻此类问题，许多合同现在都包括一个反技术条款，这是一个旨在防止一方利用合同措辞中的技术细节的规定。该条款作为一种保障，确保涉及各方的意图得到尊重，即使文件中存在小错误或模糊之处。反技术条款的基本内容是，各方不会因严格解释合同条款而相互追究责任，如果这种解释可能导致不公正的结果。例如，如果合同规定了某些付款条件，但包含了排版错误，反技术条款允许各方关注意图而不是有缺陷的措辞。这在复杂协议中尤为重要，因为其风险高，误解的后果可能是严重的。在合同中包含反技术条款的主要好处之一是它促进了各方之间的合作精神。各方不再将合同视为一个战场，逐字逐句地审查每个词以寻找潜在的漏洞，而是鼓励更具合作性的心态。各方更有可能友好地解决争议，专注于协议的整体目标，而不是被小差异所困扰。此外，反技术条款可以节省时间和资源。关于技术细节的法律斗争可能漫长而昂贵，耗尽当事人的财务和情感资源。通过纳入这一条款，各方可以避免冗长的诉讼，而是朝着互利的解决方案努力。这种效率在商业环境中尤其宝贵，因为时间通常与金钱等同。然而，反技术条款的纳入并非没有批评者。有些人认为这可能导致合同执行中的模糊性，因为它在合同解释中引入了一定程度的主观性。批评者认为，依赖这样的条款可能会削弱明确定义的合同本应提供的可预测性和稳定性。他们认为，各方应对使用的精确语言负责，因为这促进了在起草协议时的谨慎和周到。尽管存在这些担忧，越来越多的合同采用反技术条款反映了法律领域更广泛的转变。随着社会变得日益复杂和相互关联，对法律协议灵活性的需求从未如此明显。各方正在认识到，严格遵守技术语言有时会妨碍公正和公平，这促使他们接受更务实的方法。总之，反技术条款代表了合同法的重要演变，旨在平衡对精确性的需求与人类错误和解释的现实。通过允许各方关注其真实意图，而不是纠缠于小差异，该条款增强了合作，节省了资源，并最终促进了更公平的法律环境。随着我们继续驾驭现代协议的复杂性，反技术条款可能会在各个行业的合同中变得越来越普遍。