additional duty on flour

简明释义

面粉附加税

英英释义

例句

1.The government has imposed an additional duty on flour to protect local farmers.

政府对面粉的附加税的征收是为了保护当地农民。

2.The additional duty on flour was introduced to curb imports and boost local production.

为了抑制进口并促进本地生产，政府引入了面粉的附加税。

3.Bakers are struggling with the new additional duty on flour affecting their profit margins.

面包师傅们正在为新的面粉的附加税而苦恼，这影响了他们的利润率。

4.Due to the additional duty on flour, bread prices have increased significantly.

由于对面粉的附加税，面包价格大幅上涨。

5.Consumers are feeling the pinch from the additional duty on flour as it raises food costs.

消费者感受到面粉的附加税带来的压力，因为这提高了食品成本。

作文

The topic of food security and pricing has become increasingly relevant in today’s global economy. One significant aspect that has emerged in discussions among policymakers is the introduction of an additional duty on flour. This measure aims to regulate the market, control inflation, and ensure that domestic producers remain competitive. However, the implications of such a duty are complex and multifaceted.First and foremost, it is essential to understand what an additional duty on flour entails. Essentially, this refers to an extra tax imposed on flour imports, which can lead to higher prices for consumers. The government may implement this duty to protect local wheat farmers from foreign competition, encouraging consumers to buy domestically produced flour instead. While this might seem beneficial for local agriculture, it can also have unintended consequences.For instance, an additional duty on flour could lead to increased bread prices, affecting low-income families the most. Bread is a staple food in many households, and any rise in its cost can strain budgets significantly. Moreover, small bakeries and food businesses that rely on affordable flour may struggle to cope with these increased costs, potentially leading to job losses and reduced economic activity in the sector.Furthermore, the introduction of an additional duty on flour might provoke retaliatory measures from other countries. If one nation raises duties on imported flour, others may respond by imposing their own tariffs on products that they import from that country. This tit-for-tat scenario can escalate into a trade war, harming international relations and leading to greater economic instability.On the other hand, proponents of the additional duty on flour argue that it can bolster local economies by fostering self-sufficiency. By making imported flour more expensive, consumers may turn to local producers, thereby supporting domestic agriculture and food production. This shift can create jobs and stimulate growth within the local economy.However, the effectiveness of such a policy depends on various factors, including the elasticity of demand for flour and the availability of local substitutes. If consumers are unwilling or unable to pay higher prices for flour, they may seek alternatives, such as different types of grains or baked goods. This shift could undermine the intended benefits of the additional duty on flour.In conclusion, while the idea of imposing an additional duty on flour may seem appealing from a protectionist standpoint, it is crucial to consider the broader implications. Policymakers must weigh the potential benefits to local producers against the risks of increased consumer prices, economic retaliation, and the overall impact on food security. A balanced approach that considers both local agricultural interests and the needs of consumers is vital in crafting effective food policy. Ultimately, the goal should be to create a sustainable food system that supports both producers and consumers alike.

食品安全和价格的话题在当今全球经济中变得越来越相关。政策制定者讨论的一个重要方面是对面粉征收额外关税的提案。这项措施旨在调节市场、控制通货膨胀，并确保国内生产商保持竞争力。然而，这种关税的影响是复杂而多方面的。首先，了解额外关税对面粉的含义至关重要。基本上，这指的是对进口面粉征收的额外税，这可能导致消费者价格上涨。政府可能会实施这一关税以保护本地小麦农民免受外国竞争的影响，鼓励消费者购买国内生产的面粉。然而，这看似对当地农业有利，但也可能产生意想不到的后果。例如，额外关税可能导致面包价格上涨，最受影响的将是低收入家庭。面包是许多家庭的主食，任何价格上涨都可能显著增加家庭预算的压力。此外，依赖廉价面粉的小型面包店和食品企业可能会因这些成本增加而难以应对，可能导致失业和该行业经济活动减少。此外，实施额外关税可能引发其他国家的报复性措施。如果一个国家提高了进口面粉的关税，其他国家可能会通过对从该国进口的产品征收关税来回应。这种针锋相对的情况可能升级为贸易战，损害国际关系并导致更大的经济不稳定。另一方面，额外关税的支持者认为，这可以通过促进自给自足来增强地方经济。通过使进口面粉更昂贵，消费者可能会转向本地生产者，从而支持国内农业和食品生产。这种转变可以创造就业机会，并刺激当地经济的增长。然而，这种政策的有效性取决于多个因素，包括面粉需求的弹性和本地替代品的可用性。如果消费者不愿意或无法支付更高的面粉价格，他们可能会寻找替代品，例如不同类型的谷物或烘焙食品。这种转变可能会削弱额外关税的预期好处。总之，尽管从保护主义的角度来看，对面粉征收额外关税的想法似乎很有吸引力，但考虑更广泛的影响至关重要。政策制定者必须权衡对当地生产者的潜在利益与消费者价格上涨、经济报复以及对食品安全整体影响的风险。制定考虑到当地农业利益和消费者需求的平衡方法，对于制定有效的食品政策至关重要。最终，目标应该是创建一个可持续的食品系统，既支持生产者，也支持消费者。