ad hoc court

简明释义

特别法庭

英英释义

例句

1.An ad hoc court can be a solution for countries lacking robust legal systems.

对于缺乏健全法律系统的国家来说，临时法庭可以是一种解决方案。

2.The government established an ad hoc court to address the urgent need for justice in the recent crisis.

政府设立了一个临时法庭以应对最近危机中迫切需要的司法公正。

3.The ad hoc court was tasked with investigating allegations of war crimes.

这个临时法庭负责调查战争罪指控。

4.In cases of international disputes, an ad hoc court can be formed to ensure fair arbitration.

在国际争端案件中，可以成立一个临时法庭以确保公正的仲裁。

5.Legal experts often debate the effectiveness of an ad hoc court compared to permanent judicial bodies.

法律专家常常讨论临时法庭与常设司法机构相比的有效性。

作文

The concept of an ad hoc court refers to a temporary judicial body established for a specific purpose or to address a particular issue. These courts are not permanent institutions; instead, they are formed to deal with unique circumstances that require immediate legal attention. This flexibility allows them to respond effectively to urgent matters, especially in situations where existing legal frameworks may be insufficient or inadequate. For instance, the establishment of an ad hoc court can be seen in international law, particularly in the context of war crimes and human rights violations. Such courts are often created in response to conflicts or crises, providing a means to hold accountable those responsible for atrocities committed during such times.One notable example of an ad hoc court is the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), which was set up in 1993 to prosecute serious crimes committed during the Balkan conflicts in the 1990s. The ICTY served as a crucial mechanism for delivering justice and promoting reconciliation in a region plagued by ethnic tensions and violence. By establishing an ad hoc court, the international community demonstrated its commitment to addressing impunity and ensuring that perpetrators of heinous acts would face legal consequences.In addition to addressing specific conflicts, ad hoc courts can also play a significant role in transitional justice processes. Countries emerging from periods of dictatorship or civil strife often face the challenge of reconciling their past with the need for stability and peace. In such contexts, ad hoc courts can provide a platform for victims to seek justice and for societies to confront their histories. This process not only serves the purpose of punishing wrongdoers but also helps to establish a historical record of events, which is vital for national healing.However, the establishment of an ad hoc court is not without challenges. Critics often point out that these courts may lack the resources, authority, or legitimacy of permanent judicial institutions. Additionally, there can be concerns regarding the selective nature of prosecutions, where only certain individuals are held accountable while others escape justice. This raises questions about fairness and the broader implications of using ad hoc courts as tools for political agendas.Despite these challenges, the importance of ad hoc courts cannot be understated. They represent a critical response to the need for justice in situations where traditional legal mechanisms fail to operate effectively. By providing a temporary yet focused approach to addressing specific legal issues, ad hoc courts can contribute to the overall goal of promoting accountability and upholding the rule of law. It is essential for the international community to support these initiatives, ensuring that they are equipped with the necessary resources and frameworks to fulfill their mandates.In conclusion, ad hoc courts serve as vital instruments in the pursuit of justice, particularly in contexts marked by conflict and human rights abuses. While they may face various criticisms and limitations, their ability to address urgent legal issues and promote accountability makes them an essential component of the global justice system. As we continue to witness conflicts and crises around the world, the role of ad hoc courts will remain significant in striving towards a more just and equitable society.

“ad hoc court”一词的概念指的是为特定目的或解决特定问题而设立的临时司法机构。这些法庭不是永久性的机构，而是为了应对需要立即法律关注的独特情况而成立。这种灵活性使它们能够有效应对紧急事务，特别是在现有法律框架可能不足或不够充分的情况下。例如，在国际法中，设立“ad hoc court”的实例可以在战争罪和人权侵犯的背景下看到。这类法院通常是在冲突或危机响应中创建的，为追究在此期间犯下暴行的责任提供了一种手段。一个显著的“ad hoc court”例子是前南斯拉夫国际刑事法庭（ICTY），该法庭于1993年成立，旨在起诉在1990年代巴尔干冲突中犯下的严重罪行。ICTY作为提供正义和促进和解的重要机制，在一个因种族紧张和暴力而困扰的地区发挥了关键作用。通过建立“ad hoc court”，国际社会展示了其对追究责任和确保对可怕行为的肇事者面临法律后果的承诺。除了应对特定冲突外，“ad hoc courts”在过渡正义过程中也可以发挥重要作用。从独裁统治或内战中走出来的国家常常面临将过去与稳定和和平的需要相结合的挑战。在这种背景下，“ad hoc courts”可以为受害者寻求正义、让社会面对历史提供一个平台。这一过程不仅服务于惩罚罪犯的目的，还帮助建立事件的历史记录，这对于国家的愈合至关重要。然而，建立“ad hoc court”并非没有挑战。批评者常常指出，这些法院可能缺乏资源、权威或永久司法机构的合法性。此外，可能会对起诉的选择性性质产生担忧，即只有某些个人被追究责任，而其他人则逃避正义。这引发了关于公平性和利用“ad hoc courts”作为政治议程工具的更广泛影响的问题。尽管面临这些挑战，“ad hoc courts”的重要性不可低估。它们代表了对传统法律机制未能有效运作的情况下对正义需求的关键回应。通过为解决特定法律问题提供一种临时但集中的方法，“ad hoc courts”可以为促进问责制和维护法治的总体目标作出贡献。国际社会必须支持这些倡议，确保它们具备履行职责所需的资源和框架。总之，“ad hoc courts”作为追求正义的重要工具，尤其是在冲突和人权侵犯的背景下。尽管它们可能面临各种批评和局限性，但它们解决紧急法律问题和促进问责制的能力使它们成为全球司法体系的重要组成部分。随着我们继续目睹世界各地的冲突和危机，“ad hoc courts”的角色在追求更公正和公平的社会方面将仍然显得重要。