actual deadweight

简明释义

实际载重吨位

英英释义

例句

1.Understanding the actual deadweight in logistics can help reduce shipping expenses.

了解物流中的实际无效负担可以帮助减少运输费用。

2.The report highlighted the actual deadweight in our marketing strategy, indicating areas for improvement.

报告强调了我们营销策略中的实际无效负担，指出了改进的领域。

3.To maximize profits, the team analyzed the actual deadweight associated with each product line.

为了最大化利润，团队分析了与每个产品线相关的实际无效负担。

4.In this project, we need to identify the actual deadweight costs to improve our budget.

在这个项目中，我们需要识别实际无效负担成本，以改善我们的预算。

5.The company calculated the actual deadweight to assess the efficiency of its operations.

公司计算了实际无效负担以评估其运营效率。

作文

In economics, the concept of deadweight loss is crucial for understanding the inefficiencies that can arise in a market. One specific type of deadweight loss is referred to as actual deadweight, which represents the real loss of economic efficiency when the equilibrium outcome is not achievable or not achieved. This situation often occurs due to various market distortions such as taxes, subsidies, price ceilings, or price floors. To illustrate this concept, let us consider a simple example involving a common good: public transportation.Imagine a city with a public transportation system that is heavily subsidized by the government. The intention behind this subsidy is to make transportation affordable for all citizens, thereby promoting social welfare and reducing traffic congestion. However, the subsidy creates a situation where the price of using public transport is lower than the market equilibrium price. As a result, more people are encouraged to use the service than would otherwise do so if they had to pay the true cost of their transportation.While it may seem beneficial at first glance, this leads to an actual deadweight loss in the economy. The excess demand for public transportation means that the available resources—such as buses, drivers, and fuel—are being over-utilized. Consequently, the quality of service may decline, leading to longer waiting times and overcrowded vehicles. In this scenario, the economic efficiency is compromised because the resources are not allocated optimally.Similarly, consider a scenario where a government imposes a price ceiling on essential goods like bread. The intention is to keep prices affordable for low-income families. However, this price control can lead to shortages, as suppliers may not find it profitable to produce enough bread at the lower price. The result is another form of actual deadweight loss, as the quantity of bread supplied falls short of the quantity demanded, creating a gap that reflects lost economic value.Understanding actual deadweight loss is vital for policymakers. It highlights the importance of carefully considering the implications of interventions in the market. While well-intentioned policies may aim to enhance welfare, they can inadvertently lead to inefficiencies that harm the very individuals they intend to support. Therefore, it is crucial for economists and policymakers to analyze the potential impacts of their decisions on market dynamics thoroughly.In conclusion, actual deadweight loss serves as a reminder of the complexities involved in economic policymaking. By recognizing the situations that lead to this phenomenon, we can better strategize ways to mitigate inefficiencies and promote a more effective allocation of resources. Ultimately, the goal should be to create a balanced approach that fosters economic growth while ensuring that the needs of all citizens are met without causing unnecessary distortions in the market.

在经济学中，死重损失的概念对于理解市场中可能出现的低效情况至关重要。一种特定类型的死重损失被称为实际死重，它表示当均衡结果无法实现或未实现时经济效率的真实损失。这种情况通常由于各种市场扭曲而发生，例如税收、补贴、价格上限或价格下限。为了说明这一概念，让我们考虑一个涉及公共交通的简单例子。想象一下，一个城市的公共交通系统受到政府的重度补贴。补贴背后的意图是使交通对所有公民都负担得起，从而促进社会福利并减少交通拥堵。然而，补贴造成了使用公共交通的价格低于市场均衡价格的情况。因此，更多的人被鼓励使用该服务，而不是在需要支付运输真实成本的情况下使用它。虽然乍一看似乎是有益的，但这导致了经济中的实际死重损失。公共交通的过度需求意味着可用资源——如公交车、司机和燃料——被过度利用。因此，服务质量可能下降，导致更长的等待时间和拥挤的车辆。在这种情况下，经济效率受到损害，因为资源没有得到最佳配置。同样，考虑一种情况，政府对基本商品如面包实施价格上限。意图是保持价格对低收入家庭的可负担性。然而，这种价格控制可能导致短缺，因为供应商可能发现以较低价格生产足够的面包不具盈利性。结果是另一种形式的实际死重损失，因为供应的面包数量不足以满足需求，形成反映丧失经济价值的差距。理解实际死重损失对政策制定者至关重要。它突显了在市场中仔细考虑干预措施影响的重要性。虽然出于良好意图的政策可能旨在增强福利，但它们可能无意中导致低效，损害其旨在支持的个人。因此，经济学家和政策制定者必须彻底分析他们决策对市场动态的潜在影响。总之，实际死重损失提醒我们经济政策制定中涉及的复杂性。通过认识到导致这种现象的情况，我们可以更好地制定减轻低效并促进资源更有效配置的策略。最终，目标应该是创造一种平衡的方法，促进经济增长，同时确保满足所有公民的需求，而不会造成市场的不必要扭曲。