lapidate

简明释义

英[ˈlæpɪˌdeɪt]美[ˈlæpəˌdeɪt]

v. 以石投击；投石击毙

第 三 人 称 单 数 l a p i d a t e s

现 在 分 词 l a p i d a t i n g

过 去 式 l a p i d a t e d

过 去 分 词 l a p i d a t e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The act of lapidate 用石头打死 was seen as a form of communal justice in some cultures.

在某些文化中，石刑被视为一种社区正义的形式。

2.Historical records indicate that certain religious groups practiced lapidate 用石头打死 as a punishment for adultery.

历史记录表明，某些宗教团体将石刑作为通奸的惩罚。

3.In ancient times, people would often lapidate 用石头打死 those who were accused of serious crimes.

在古代，人们常常会用石头打死那些被指控犯有严重罪行的人。

4.During the trial, the defendant feared that the jury would lapidate 用石头打死 him if they found him guilty.

在审判期间，被告担心如果陪审团判他有罪，他们会用石头打死他。

5.The concept of lapidate 用石头打死 is often discussed in studies of ancient legal systems.

石刑的概念常常在古代法律体系的研究中被讨论。

作文

In the annals of history, there have been various forms of punishment that reflect the values and norms of a society. One of the most severe and controversial methods is to lapidate, which means to execute someone by throwing stones at them until they die. This form of capital punishment has roots in ancient cultures, where it was often used for crimes deemed particularly heinous, such as adultery or blasphemy. The act of lapidate carries with it not only a physical brutality but also a social commentary on the collective responsibility of a community. The practice of lapidate can be seen as a reflection of societal values, where the community takes part in the punishment, reinforcing the idea that certain behaviors are intolerable. In many cases, this method of execution was justified by religious texts, which prescribed severe penalties for specific offenses. For instance, in some interpretations of ancient law, lapidate was viewed as a necessary measure to maintain moral order and uphold divine commandments.However, as societies evolved, the practice of lapidate has increasingly come under scrutiny. Human rights advocates argue that such punishments are barbaric and violate the fundamental principles of human dignity. The global community has largely moved towards more humane forms of justice, focusing on rehabilitation rather than retribution. In modern times, the act of lapidate is often associated with oppressive regimes that use it as a tool for instilling fear and maintaining control over the populace.Despite its historical prevalence, the concept of lapidate raises important ethical questions about justice and morality. Is it ever acceptable for a society to take a life in such a brutal manner? Can we justify the collective participation of a community in an act that results in death? These questions challenge us to consider the implications of our legal systems and the values they promote.In contemporary discussions, the term lapidate serves as a powerful reminder of the darker aspects of human nature and the capacity for violence that exists within societies. It compels us to reflect on our own values and the ways in which we administer justice. As we strive for a more equitable world, it is crucial to recognize the historical significance of practices like lapidate and to advocate for systems that prioritize compassion and understanding over punishment.In conclusion, the act of lapidate is not merely a relic of the past; it is a concept that continues to resonate in discussions about justice and morality today. By examining the implications of such practices, we can better understand the evolution of societal norms and the ongoing struggle for human rights. It is our responsibility to ensure that history does not repeat itself and that we move towards a future where all individuals are treated with respect and dignity, free from the threat of barbaric punishments like lapidate.

在历史的年鉴中，有各种形式的惩罚反映了社会的价值观和规范。其中一种最严厉且有争议的方法是石刑，意思是通过扔石头将某人处死。这种死刑方式源于古代文化，通常用于被认为特别可憎的罪行，如通奸或亵渎。石刑的行为不仅带有身体上的残酷性，还传达了社会对集体责任的评论。石刑的做法可以看作是社会价值观的反映，在这种做法中，社区参与惩罚，强化了某些行为不可容忍的观念。在许多情况下，这种执行方式是通过宗教文本来证明的，这些文本规定了特定犯罪的严厉惩罚。例如，在一些古代法律的解释中，石刑被视为维护道德秩序和遵循神圣命令的必要措施。然而，随着社会的发展，石刑的做法越来越受到审视。人权倡导者认为，这种惩罚是野蛮的，违反了人类尊严的基本原则。全球社会已经大多转向更人道的司法形式，专注于康复而非报复。在现代，石刑这一行为常常与压迫政权联系在一起，这些政权利用它作为一种工具来灌输恐惧并维持对民众的控制。尽管这种做法在历史上普遍存在，但石刑的概念引发了关于正义和道德的重要伦理问题。一个社会是否可以以如此残酷的方式夺取生命？我们能否为一个社区在导致死亡的行为中集体参与辩护？这些问题挑战着我们思考法律体系的影响及其所促进的价值观。在当代讨论中，石刑一词成为了人性阴暗面和社会中存在的暴力倾向的有力提醒。它促使我们反思自己的价值观以及我们如何实施正义。随着我们努力追求一个更加公正的世界，重要的是要认识到像石刑这样的做法的历史意义，并倡导优先考虑同情和理解而非惩罚的系统。总之，石刑这一行为不仅仅是过去的遗物；它是一个在今天关于正义和道德的讨论中继续引起共鸣的概念。通过审视这些做法的影响，我们可以更好地理解社会规范的演变以及人权斗争的持续。确保历史不重演，推动一个所有个体都受到尊重和尊严对待的未来，是我们的责任，摆脱像石刑这样的野蛮惩罚的威胁。