slashing

简明释义

英[ˈslæʃɪŋ]美[ˈslæʃɪŋ]

adj. 猛烈的；严厉的；冲劲十足的；巨大的

n. 猛砍；鞭打；（衣服上的）开衩，切口

v. 砍；鞭打（slash 的现在分词）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Before you go slashing all the functionality of your user pages, a word of caution is in order.

在您大刀阔斧削减用户页面的所有功能之前，必须提一句警告。

2.They're all evidence that slashing spending in the face of high unemployment is a mistake.

它们都证明了，在高失业率的情形下，疯狂消费是不可能的。

3.Much of the fall was due to businesses slashing inventories to cope with drops in sales.

这次下降主要是由于企业为应对销售下降而削减存货引起的。

4.Sabre has been slashing costs and shipping work to Poland and India.

Sabre一直都在大幅削减成本，并将业务外包到波兰和印度。

5.Carmakers are slashing production to reduce big inventories.

汽车制造商在大量削减生产以降低库存。

6.The jumbo jet changed the economics of air travel by slashing costs per seat and lowering ticket prices.

这架大型喷气式客机依靠削减单个座位的成本和降低票价为空旅经济带来了革新。

7.She tried to kill herself by slashing her wrists.

她试图割腕自杀。

8.If price-slashing helps Tesco pick up a lot of price-conscious customers, it will prove a worthwhile gamble.

如果降价能使特易购获得许多有省钱意识的客户，那么不妨一试。

9.The company announced a major cost-cutting plan, which includes slashing 削减 its marketing budget by 30%.

公司宣布了一项重大削减成本的计划，其中包括将营销预算slashing 削减 30%。

10.During the sale, prices were slashing 大幅降低 to attract more customers.

在促销期间，价格被slashing 大幅降低 以吸引更多顾客。

11.The team faced criticism for slashing 削减 funding for essential community programs.

该团队因slashing 削减 对基本社区项目的资金而受到批评。

12.After the incident, the manager was slashing 大幅减少 employee bonuses to save money.

事件发生后，经理决定slashing 大幅减少 员工奖金以节省资金。

13.The artist created a stunning piece by slashing 划破 the canvas with vibrant colors.

这位艺术家通过用鲜艳的颜色slashing 划破 画布创作出一件惊艳的作品。

作文

In today's fast-paced world, the term slashing (削减) has become increasingly relevant, especially in discussions about budgets and expenses. Organizations, both large and small, often find themselves in situations where they need to cut costs to remain competitive. This process can be challenging, as it requires careful consideration of where to make these slashing (削减) cuts without compromising the quality of products or services. In this essay, I will explore the implications of slashing (削减) budgets, the strategies that organizations can employ, and the potential consequences of such actions.First and foremost, slashing (削减) budgets can have a significant impact on an organization’s operational efficiency. When funds are limited, companies may need to reduce their workforce or cut back on essential resources. For instance, a company might decide to implement slashing (削减) measures by laying off employees or reducing their hours. While these decisions may help save money in the short term, they can lead to decreased morale among remaining staff and a decline in productivity. Employees who feel insecure about their jobs may become less motivated, which can ultimately affect the organization's bottom line.Moreover, slashing (削减) budgets can also hinder innovation. Many businesses rely on research and development to stay ahead in a competitive market. However, when budgets are tight, funds for innovative projects may be one of the first areas to be cut. This can create a vicious cycle where organizations that engage in slashing (削减) their R&D budgets may find themselves falling behind their competitors who continue to invest in new technologies and ideas. Therefore, while slashing (削减) budgets might provide immediate financial relief, it can jeopardize long-term growth and sustainability.On the other hand, slashing (削减) budgets can also present opportunities for organizations to reassess their priorities and streamline operations. By evaluating expenditures, companies can identify areas where they may be overspending or where efficiencies can be gained. For example, an organization might find that it is spending excessively on outdated technology or redundant processes. In this case, slashing (削减) those costs could lead to a more efficient operation and better allocation of resources.To successfully implement slashing (削减) strategies, organizations should approach the process with a clear plan. Communication is key; leaders must ensure that all employees understand the reasons behind the cuts and how they will benefit the organization in the long run. Additionally, engaging employees in the decision-making process can foster a sense of ownership and commitment to the organization’s goals. This collaborative approach can mitigate some of the negative impacts associated with slashing (削减) budgets, as employees may feel more involved and valued.In conclusion, the concept of slashing (削减) budgets is a double-edged sword. While it may offer immediate financial relief, it can also lead to significant challenges, including decreased employee morale and stifled innovation. Organizations must navigate this complex landscape carefully, balancing the need for cost-cutting with the importance of maintaining a motivated workforce and fostering growth. Ultimately, the way in which an organization approaches slashing (削减) its budget can determine its future success or failure.

在当今快节奏的世界中，术语slashing（削减）变得越来越相关，特别是在预算和开支的讨论中。无论是大型还是小型组织，常常会发现自己面临需要削减成本以保持竞争力的情况。这个过程可能是具有挑战性的，因为它需要仔细考虑在哪里进行这些slashing（削减）削减，而不影响产品或服务的质量。在这篇文章中，我将探讨slashing（削减）预算的影响，组织可以采用的策略以及此类行动的潜在后果。首先，slashing（削减）预算对组织的运营效率可能产生重大影响。当资金有限时，公司可能需要减少员工或削减必要资源。例如，一家公司可能决定通过裁员或减少员工工作时间来实施slashing（削减）措施。虽然这些决定可能在短期内节省资金，但它们可能导致剩余员工的士气下降和生产力下降。感到工作不安全的员工可能会变得缺乏动力，这最终会影响组织的底线。此外，slashing（削减）预算还可能阻碍创新。许多企业依靠研发来在竞争市场中保持领先。然而，当预算紧张时，创新项目的资金可能是第一个被削减的领域。这可能造成一个恶性循环，在此循环中，进行slashing（削减）研发预算的组织可能发现自己落后于继续投资新技术和创意的竞争对手。因此，尽管slashing（削减）预算可能提供即时的财务救济，但它可能危及长期的增长和可持续性。另一方面，slashing（削减）预算也可以为组织重新评估其优先事项和精简运营提供机会。通过评估支出，公司可以识别出可能过度支出或可以获得效率的领域。例如，一个组织可能发现它在过时的技术或冗余流程上花费过多。在这种情况下，slashing（削减）这些成本可能会导致更高效的运营和更好的资源分配。为了成功实施slashing（削减）策略，组织应该以明确的计划来处理这一过程。沟通是关键；领导者必须确保所有员工理解削减的原因以及如何使组织在长期受益。此外，邀请员工参与决策过程可以培养一种归属感和对组织目标的承诺。这种合作方法可以缓解与slashing（削减）预算相关的一些负面影响，因为员工可能会感到更加参与和重视。总之，slashing（削减）预算的概念是一把双刃剑。虽然它可能提供立即的财务救济，但它也可能导致显著的挑战，包括员工士气下降和创新受阻。组织必须小心地导航这一复杂的环境，平衡削减成本的需要与保持员工积极性和促进增长的重要性。最终，组织处理slashing（削减）预算的方式可以决定其未来的成功或失败。