allegation

简明释义

英[ˌæləˈɡeɪʃn]美[ˌæləˈɡeɪʃn]

n. （无证据的）说法，指控

复 数 a l l e g a t i o n s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.One allegation often made is that noise produces mental illness.

常见的一种指责是，噪音能引起精神病。

2.Congressman Lamar Smith was among Republicans making the allegation.

众议院议员拉马·史密斯是提出声明的共和党成员之一。

3.Allegation of jurisdiction.

管辖权声明。

4."I have enquired on the matter but no-one confirms the allegation of shooting," he wrote.

“我已经过问此事，但没人可以确认这是一起非法枪杀事件，”他写到。

5.The allegation, made by his estranged wife, is denied by Mr Huhne.

这一指控由与他分居的妻子提出，但是休恩本人拒绝承认这一指控。

6.That allegation is a flat-out lie.

那一个指控是彻底的谎言。

7.Under Iraq's legal system a judge investigates an allegation before recommending whether to order a trial.

根据伊拉克的法律，在决定是否审判前要经过法官的调查。

8.He has hired a lawyer to defend him against the allegation.

他已聘请一位律师为他所受的指控辩护。

9.Mr Kagame angrily denies the allegation.

卡加梅愤怒地否认了这一指控。

10.After the allegation of misconduct surfaced, the employee was placed on administrative leave.

在不当行为的指控浮出水面后，该员工被置于行政休假状态。

11.Despite the allegation, there was no evidence to support the claim.

尽管有指控，但没有证据支持这一说法。

12.The school launched an investigation following the allegation of bullying.

在发生欺凌指控后，学校启动了调查。

13.The company denied the allegation that it had been involved in fraudulent activities.

公司否认了关于其参与欺诈活动的指控。

14.The politician faced serious consequences due to the allegation of corruption.

由于腐败的指控，这位政治家面临严重后果。

作文

In recent years, the term allegation has become increasingly prominent in media discourse. An allegation is a claim or assertion that someone has done something illegal or wrong, typically one made without proof. This concept is particularly significant in legal contexts, where accusations can lead to serious consequences for individuals and organizations. Understanding the implications of an allegation is crucial, especially in our information-driven society where news spreads rapidly through social media and other channels.The impact of an allegation can be profound. For instance, when a public figure is accused of misconduct, it often leads to immediate public scrutiny and can result in damage to their reputation, regardless of the truth behind the claim. This phenomenon highlights the power of perception; an allegation alone can alter how individuals are viewed by society. In many cases, the mere existence of an allegation can be enough to tarnish a person's career or diminish their credibility, even if they are ultimately exonerated.Moreover, the process of handling an allegation can vary significantly depending on the context. In some instances, legal proceedings may follow, where evidence is presented, and a determination is made regarding the validity of the allegation. In other cases, organizations may conduct internal investigations to assess the situation and determine appropriate actions. It is essential to approach such situations with caution and due diligence, as jumping to conclusions based solely on allegations can lead to misinformation and unjust outcomes.The role of media in reporting allegations cannot be overlooked. Journalists have the responsibility to report fairly and accurately, ensuring that they provide context and refrain from sensationalism. Misleading headlines and incomplete stories can exacerbate the situation, leading to public outrage based on unverified claims. Therefore, it is vital for consumers of news to critically evaluate the information presented to them and consider the potential ramifications of allegations before forming opinions.Additionally, the legal framework surrounding allegations varies across different jurisdictions. Some legal systems uphold the principle of 'innocent until proven guilty,' meaning that an individual should not be presumed guilty based solely on an allegation. However, this principle can sometimes be overshadowed by public opinion and media narratives, complicating the pursuit of justice. It raises important questions about fairness and the rights of the accused, emphasizing the need for a balanced approach to dealing with allegations.In conclusion, the term allegation embodies a complex interplay of legal, social, and ethical dimensions. As we navigate a world where information is readily available, it is crucial to approach allegations with a discerning eye, recognizing their potential impact on individuals' lives and society at large. Whether in the courtroom or the court of public opinion, understanding the weight of an allegation is essential for fostering a just and informed community.

近年来，术语allegation在媒体话语中变得越来越突出。allegation是指某人做了违法或错误事情的主张或断言，通常是在没有证据的情况下提出的。这个概念在法律上下文中特别重要，因为指控可能会对个人和组织产生严重后果。理解allegation的含义至关重要，特别是在我们这个信息驱动的社会中，新闻通过社交媒体和其他渠道迅速传播。allegation的影响可能是深远的。例如，当公众人物被指控不当行为时，通常会立即引发公众的审查，并可能导致他们声誉的损害，无论该主张背后的真相如何。这种现象突显了认知的力量；仅仅存在的allegation就可以改变个人在社会中的形象。在许多情况下，仅仅是allegation的存在就足以损害一个人的职业生涯或降低他们的可信度，即使他们最终被证明无罪。此外，处理allegation的过程可能会因上下文而异。在某些情况下，可能会随之进行法律程序，在这些程序中，证据被提出，并对allegation的有效性做出判断。在其他情况下，组织可能会进行内部调查，以评估情况并确定适当的措施。在这种情况下，谨慎和尽职调查至关重要，因为仅仅根据allegation跳到结论可能会导致误传和不公正的结果。媒体在报道allegation中的角色也不可忽视。记者有责任公平、准确地报道，确保提供背景信息并避免耸人听闻。误导性的标题和不完整的故事可能会加剧情况，导致公众基于未经核实的主张而愤怒。因此，新闻消费者在形成观点之前，批判性地评估所提供的信息，并考虑allegation的潜在影响是至关重要的。此外，不同法域对allegation的法律框架有所不同。一些法律体系坚持“无罪推定”的原则，这意味着个人不应仅根据allegation被假定有罪。然而，这一原则有时可能被公众舆论和媒体叙述所掩盖，使追求正义变得复杂。这引发了关于公平和被告权利的重要问题，强调了在处理allegation时需要采取平衡的方法。总之，术语allegation体现了法律、社会和伦理维度之间复杂的相互作用。在我们航行于一个信息触手可及的世界时，至关重要的是以敏锐的眼光看待allegation，认识到它们对个人生活和整个社会的潜在影响。无论是在法庭上还是在公众舆论的法庭上，理解allegation的分量对于促进一个公正和知情的社区至关重要。