paternalist

简明释义

英[pəˈtɜːrnəlɪst]美[pəˈtɜrnəlɪst]

n. 家长主义者；实行家长制统治的人

adj. 家长作风的；家长式统治的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The whole place was the romantic vision of the paternalist local squire.

这整个地方就是那位家长式乡绅的浪漫想象。 。

2.The whole place was the romantic vision of the paternalist local squire.

这整个地方就是那位家长式乡绅的浪漫想象。

3.Primo de Rivera himself was a benevolent and sincere paternalist.

普里莫·德里韦拉本人是个仁慈而真诚的家长式人物。

4.The whole place was the romantic vision of the paternalist local squire.

这整个地方就是那位家长式乡绅的浪漫想象。

5.They are paternalist.

他们是家长主义者。

6.The company's management adopted a paternalist approach, believing they knew what was best for their employees.

公司的管理层采取了家长式的方法，认为他们知道员工最需要什么。

7.Her paternalist attitude towards her children often led to conflicts.

她对孩子的家长式态度常常导致冲突。

8.Many critics argue that a paternalist system can undermine individual autonomy.

许多批评者认为，家长式系统可能会削弱个人自主权。

9.In a paternalist society, the government often intervenes in personal choices for the sake of public welfare.

在一个家长式社会中，政府常常为了公共福利干预个人选择。

10.The paternalist policies implemented by the school aimed to protect students from making poor decisions.

学校实施的家长式政策旨在保护学生不做出错误决策。

作文

The concept of a paternalist approach often arises in discussions about governance and social policy. A paternalist is someone who believes that authority figures, such as governments or organizations, should take a protective role in the lives of individuals, making decisions on their behalf for their own good. This ideology can be seen in various contexts, from public health initiatives to economic regulations. While the intention behind a paternalist stance may be well-meaning, it raises important questions about individual autonomy and freedom of choice.In many societies, the debate surrounding paternalist policies is intense. Supporters argue that such measures are necessary to protect vulnerable populations from harm. For example, laws mandating seatbelt use or regulations banning smoking in public places can be viewed as paternalist interventions aimed at safeguarding public health. Proponents contend that these policies help prevent accidents and reduce healthcare costs in the long run.On the other hand, critics of paternalist policies argue that they undermine personal responsibility and the right to make individual choices. They believe that adults should have the freedom to make their own decisions, even if those decisions might lead to negative consequences. This perspective emphasizes the importance of personal agency and the belief that individuals are best suited to determine what is in their own best interest.The tension between paternalist policies and individual autonomy is particularly evident in the realm of education. Many educational institutions adopt paternalist approaches by enforcing strict rules and guidelines designed to protect students. For instance, schools may impose dress codes or limit access to certain materials, arguing that these measures create a safer and more conducive learning environment. However, some educators and parents argue that such restrictions stifle creativity and critical thinking, ultimately hindering students' ability to navigate the complexities of the real world.Moreover, the rise of technology has added another layer to the discussion of paternalist governance. With the increasing prevalence of digital platforms, questions arise about how much control should be exerted over online behavior. Social media companies, for instance, often implement content moderation policies that can be perceived as paternalist. While these policies aim to protect users from harmful content, they also raise concerns about censorship and the suppression of free expression.In conclusion, the notion of a paternalist approach in governance and social policy presents a complex dilemma. While there are undeniable benefits to protecting individuals from harm, it is crucial to strike a balance between safeguarding the public and respecting personal liberties. The challenge lies in finding ways to implement paternalist policies that genuinely benefit society without infringing on individual rights. As we navigate this intricate landscape, ongoing dialogue and critical examination of paternalist practices will be essential to ensure that we honor both our collective well-being and our individual freedoms.

“paternalist”这一概念通常出现在关于治理和社会政策的讨论中。paternalist是指那些相信权威人物（如政府或组织）应该在个人生活中扮演保护角色，代表个人做出决策以维护他们自身利益的人。这种意识形态可以在各种背景下看到，从公共卫生倡议到经济监管。尽管paternalist立场背后的意图可能是善意的，但它引发了关于个人自主权和选择自由的重要问题。在许多社会中，围绕paternalist政策的辩论非常激烈。支持者认为，这种措施对于保护弱势群体免受伤害是必要的。例如，强制使用安全带的法律或禁止在公共场所吸烟的规定可以被视为旨在保护公共健康的paternalist干预。支持者主张，这些政策有助于防止事故并在长期内减少医疗成本。另一方面，批评paternalist政策的人则认为，它们削弱了个人责任感和做出个人选择的权利。他们认为，成年人应该有自由做出自己的决定，即使这些决定可能导致负面后果。这种观点强调个人代理的重要性，以及个体最适合确定什么对自己最有利的信念。在教育领域，paternalist政策之间的紧张关系尤为明显。许多教育机构通过制定严格的规则和指导方针来保护学生，从而采用paternalist方法。例如，学校可能会实施着装规范或限制某些材料的访问，声称这些措施创造了一个更安全和更有利于学习的环境。然而，一些教育者和家长则认为，这样的限制抑制了创造力和批判性思维，最终妨碍了学生应对现实世界复杂性的能力。此外，科技的崛起为paternalist治理的讨论增添了另一个层面。随着数字平台日益普及，关于应对在线行为施加多少控制的问题浮出水面。例如，社交媒体公司经常实施内容审核政策，这些政策可能被视为paternalist。虽然这些政策旨在保护用户免受有害内容的影响，但它们也引发了关于审查和压制自由表达的担忧。总之，在治理和社会政策中，paternalist方法的概念提出了一个复杂的困境。虽然保护个人免受伤害的好处毋庸置疑，但在保障公众利益和尊重个人自由之间找到平衡至关重要。挑战在于寻找实施paternalist政策的方法，这些政策真正惠及社会而不侵犯个人权利。随着我们在这个复杂的领域中前行，对paternalist实践的持续对话和批判性审视将对确保我们尊重集体福祉和个人自由至关重要。