party line

简明释义

合用线

英英释义

例句

1.Critics argue that sticking to the party line 党派立场 can hinder genuine debate.

批评者认为坚持党派立场会妨碍真正的辩论。

2.The spokesperson reiterated the party line 党派立场 during the press conference.

发言人在新闻发布会上重申了党派立场。

3.During the meeting, everyone was expected to stick to the party line 党派立场 on the new policy.

在会议期间，大家都被期望遵循新的政策的党派立场。

4.The senator refused to follow the party line 党派立场, stating that it was against his principles.

这位参议员拒绝遵循党派立场，表示这违背了他的原则。

5.He was criticized for not adhering to the party line 党派立场 on environmental issues.

他因未能遵循在环境问题上的党派立场而受到批评。

作文

In the realm of politics, the term party line refers to the official stance or policy adopted by a political party. It represents a unified position that all members are expected to adhere to, thereby ensuring coherence and solidarity within the party. Understanding the party line is crucial for both politicians and voters alike, as it shapes legislative agendas and electoral strategies.Historically, the concept of the party line has played a significant role in democratic systems. Political parties, which are essential components of democracies, often have diverse members with varying opinions. However, for the sake of effectiveness and unity, parties establish a party line to guide their members. This can be seen in various contexts, from voting on bills to campaigning for elections. For instance, during an election campaign, candidates may emphasize the party line to present a cohesive message to voters, reinforcing the idea that they represent a collective vision rather than individual viewpoints.The adherence to the party line can sometimes lead to criticism, especially when party members prioritize party loyalty over personal beliefs or the needs of their constituents. In recent years, we have witnessed instances where politicians have faced backlash for following the party line too rigidly, particularly on contentious issues such as healthcare, immigration, and climate change. Critics argue that blind adherence to the party line stifles genuine debate and prevents innovative solutions from emerging. Moreover, the party line can also influence public perception of political parties. When a party successfully communicates its party line, it can galvanize support and create a sense of identity among its followers. Conversely, when the party line is perceived as out of touch with the electorate's concerns, it can lead to disillusionment and a loss of trust. For example, during the 2020 U.S. presidential election, many voters expressed frustration with the party line on both sides, feeling that their unique perspectives were being overlooked in favor of party loyalty.In conclusion, the concept of the party line is integral to understanding how political parties operate and how they engage with the public. While it serves to unify members and streamline decision-making, it can also pose challenges, particularly when it conflicts with individual beliefs or the needs of constituents. As citizens, it is essential to remain informed about the party line of the parties we support while also advocating for open dialogue and diverse perspectives within the political landscape. Ultimately, a healthy democracy thrives on a balance between party unity and individual expression, making it imperative for us to critically evaluate the party line and its implications for our society.

在政治领域，术语党派立场指的是一个政党所采纳的官方立场或政策。它代表着一个统一的立场，所有成员都被期望遵守，从而确保党内的一致性和团结。理解党派立场对于政治家和选民来说都至关重要，因为它影响着立法议程和选举策略。从历史上看，党派立场的概念在民主制度中发挥了重要作用。政治党派是民主的重要组成部分，通常有不同意见的成员。然而，为了有效性和团结，政党制定了党派立场来指导其成员。这可以在各种背景中看到，从对法案的投票到选举活动。例如，在选举活动期间，候选人可能会强调党派立场，以向选民传达一致的信息，加强他们代表集体愿景而非个人观点的理念。遵循党派立场有时会导致批评，特别是当党内成员优先考虑党忠诚而非个人信念或选民需求时。近年来，我们目睹了一些政治家因过于严格地遵循党派立场而面临反对，尤其是在医疗保健、移民和气候变化等争议问题上。批评者认为，盲目遵循党派立场会扼杀真正的辩论，并阻碍创新解决方案的出现。此外，党派立场还可以影响公众对政党的看法。当一个政党成功传达其党派立场时，它可以激励支持并在追随者中创造身份感。相反，当党派立场被视为与选民的关注点脱节时，可能会导致失望和信任丧失。例如，在2020年美国总统选举期间，许多选民表达了对双方党派立场的不满，觉得他们独特的观点在党忠诚的名义下被忽视。总之，党派立场的概念对于理解政党如何运作以及它们如何与公众互动至关重要。虽然它有助于团结成员和简化决策，但当它与个人信念或选民需求发生冲突时，也可能带来挑战。作为公民，了解我们支持的政党的党派立场至关重要，同时也要倡导在政治环境中进行开放对话和多元视角。最终，健康的民主依赖于党内团结与个人表达之间的平衡，因此我们必须批判性地评估党派立场及其对我们社会的影响。