respondents
简明释义
英[rɪˈspɒndənts]美[rɪˈspɑndənts]
n. 回答者,调查对象(respondent 复数形式)
英英释义
Individuals who provide answers or feedback in a survey or study. | 在调查或研究中提供答案或反馈的个人。 |
单词用法
调查受访者 | |
受访者反馈 | |
合格受访者 | |
调查的受访者 | |
受访者的意见 | |
匿名受访者 |
同义词
反义词
例句
1.The Spielberger anxiety inventory evaluates how anxious respondents feel at a particular moment.
《斯皮尔伯格焦虑量表》评估焦虑者在特定时刻的感受。
2.Survey respondents disagree over whether this generation will follow in their parents' footsteps, moving to the suburbs to raise families, or will choose to remain in the city center.
受访者对于这代人是否会跟随父母的脚步,搬到郊区安家落户,还是会选择留在市中心持不同意见。
3.Respondents ranked it last on a list of priorities.
在优先事项列表中,受访者把它排在最后。
4.The respondents had to rate the extent of their agreement.
受访者必须根据其认同的程度进行评分。
5.Respondents were invited to give their views.
受访者被邀请说出他们的观点。
6.In addition, 28% of respondents that did not have meeting facilities stated that they were likely to invest in them during the next five years.
此外,在没有会议设施的受访者中,有28%的人表示他们在未来五年内有可能对会议设施进行投资。
7.Most of the respondents 受访者 indicated that they would recommend the program to others.
大多数respondents 受访者 表示他们会向他人推荐该项目。
8.The research team analyzed the responses from the respondents 受访者 to draw meaningful conclusions.
研究团队分析了来自respondents 受访者 的回答,以得出有意义的结论。
9.The respondents 受访者 provided valuable feedback that helped improve the product.
这些respondents 受访者 提供了宝贵的反馈,帮助改善了产品。
10.The survey was sent to over 1,000 participants, and the majority of the respondents 受访者 expressed their satisfaction with the service.
调查发送给了超过1000名参与者,大多数的respondents 受访者 表达了对服务的满意。
11.In the study, the respondents 受访者 were asked about their daily habits and preferences.
在研究中,respondents 受访者 被问及他们的日常习惯和偏好。
作文
In the field of social research, the term respondents refers to individuals who provide data for analysis by answering questions in surveys or interviews. Understanding the role of respondents is crucial for researchers as their insights shape the findings and conclusions drawn from studies. A survey's effectiveness largely depends on the quality and honesty of the responses provided by these respondents. To illustrate, consider a recent study conducted to assess public opinion on climate change. The researchers designed a comprehensive questionnaire aimed at gathering diverse perspectives. The participants, or respondents, were selected from various demographics to ensure a representative sample. This included individuals from different age groups, educational backgrounds, and geographic locations. Each respondent was asked a series of questions regarding their beliefs about climate change, its impact, and potential solutions.The data collected from the respondents revealed significant trends. For instance, younger respondents tended to express more urgency regarding climate action compared to older generations. Additionally, those with higher education levels were more likely to acknowledge the scientific consensus on climate change. These insights are invaluable as they help policymakers understand which segments of the population are most concerned about environmental issues and can guide targeted communication strategies.However, researchers must also be aware of the limitations associated with relying on respondents. One major challenge is ensuring that the sample size is adequate to draw meaningful conclusions. If too few respondents participate, the results may not accurately reflect the views of the larger population. Furthermore, bias can occur if certain groups are overrepresented or underrepresented among the respondents. For example, if a survey primarily reaches individuals with access to the internet, it may overlook the opinions of those without such access, leading to skewed results.Another critical aspect is the honesty of the respondents. Social desirability bias can affect how respondents answer questions, particularly on sensitive topics. Individuals may provide answers they believe are more socially acceptable rather than their true feelings. Researchers need to design questions carefully and create an environment where respondents feel comfortable expressing their genuine opinions.In conclusion, respondents play a vital role in the research process. Their contributions help shape our understanding of various social phenomena, including public opinion on pressing issues. By carefully selecting and engaging with respondents, researchers can gather valuable data that informs policy decisions and societal changes. However, it is essential to recognize the challenges that come with collecting data from respondents and strive to mitigate biases to enhance the reliability of research findings. As we continue to explore complex social issues, the importance of understanding and valuing the perspectives of respondents will only grow.
在社会研究领域,术语respondents指的是通过回答调查或访谈中的问题提供数据以供分析的个人。理解respondents的角色对于研究人员至关重要,因为他们的见解塑造了研究得出的发现和结论。一项调查的有效性在很大程度上取决于这些respondents提供的回答的质量和诚实性。例如,考虑最近进行的一项研究,旨在评估公众对气候变化的看法。研究人员设计了一份全面的问卷,旨在收集多样化的观点。参与者,即respondents,是从不同的人群中挑选出来的,以确保样本具有代表性。这包括不同年龄组、教育背景和地理位置的个体。每位respondents被问及一系列关于他们对气候变化的信念、影响和潜在解决方案的问题。从respondents收集的数据揭示了显著的趋势。例如,年轻的respondents往往比老一代更急切地表达对气候行动的关注。此外,受教育程度较高的人更可能承认气候变化的科学共识。这些见解是非常宝贵的,因为它们帮助政策制定者了解哪些人群对环境问题最为关注,并可以指导有针对性的沟通策略。然而,研究人员也必须意识到依赖respondents所带来的局限性。一个主要的挑战是确保样本量足够,以便得出有意义的结论。如果参与的respondents太少,结果可能无法准确反映更大人群的观点。此外,如果某些群体在respondents中占比过高或过低,可能会导致偏差。例如,如果一项调查主要接触到有互联网访问权限的个体,可能会忽视那些没有此类访问权限的人的意见,从而导致结果失真。另一个关键方面是respondents的诚实性。社会期望偏差可能会影响respondents如何回答问题,特别是在敏感话题上。个体可能会提供他们认为更社会可接受的答案,而不是他们真实的感受。研究人员需要仔细设计问题,并创造一个让respondents感到舒适的环境,以便表达他们真实的观点。总之,respondents在研究过程中扮演着至关重要的角色。他们的贡献帮助塑造我们对各种社会现象的理解,包括公众对紧迫问题的看法。通过仔细选择和与respondents互动,研究人员可以收集有价值的数据,指导政策决策和社会变革。然而,必须认识到从respondents收集数据所面临的挑战,并努力减轻偏差,以增强研究结果的可靠性。随着我们继续探索复杂的社会问题,理解和重视respondents的观点的重要性只会愈加增长。