monopolistic

简明释义

英[məˌnɒpəˈlɪstɪk]美[məˌnɑːpəˈlɪstɪk]

adj. 垄断的；独占性的；专利的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.In 1948, struggling independent movie producers and exhibitors finally triumphed in their battle against the big studios' monopolistic behavior.

1948年，苦苦挣扎的独立电影制片人和放映商终于在他们与大制片厂垄断行为的斗争中取得了胜利。

2.Economic controls may also be required to guard against monopolistic structures or practices in the financial system.

防范金融体系内的垄断组织和垄断行为同样也需要经济调控。

3.It can be anticipated: the near future, the real estate market should be a monopolistic competitive market.

可以预见：在不久的将来，房地产市场应该是一个垄断竞争的市场。

4.It would be an egregious error to equate the monopolistic producer with bountiful expenditures on research.

把垄断生产商等同于研究上的大量支出，将是一个极其严重的错误。

5.At present there exist monopolistic phenomena in China, mainly in the form of administrative monopoly.

当前我国存在的垄断现象，主要是行政垄断。

6.There is a problem of shortage of quality supply in monopolistic markets because monopolists have market power.

由于垄断者具有市场力量，垄断市场存在质量供给不足的问题。

7.If true, such a move could be judged monopolistic.

如果情况属实，这种做法将会被判作是垄断行为。

8.Many consumers are frustrated by the monopolistic 垄断的 control of prices in the telecommunications industry.

许多消费者对电信行业价格的垄断的控制感到沮丧。

9.The tech giant has been accused of engaging in monopolistic 垄断的 practices that stifle competition.

这家科技巨头被指控从事垄断的行为，压制竞争。

10.The government is investigating whether the merger will create a monopolistic 垄断的 market.

政府正在调查此次合并是否会创造一个垄断的市场。

11.Regulators are concerned about the monopolistic 垄断的 tendencies of large corporations.

监管机构对大型公司的垄断的倾向表示担忧。

12.Some argue that a monopolistic 垄断的 market can lead to innovation stagnation.

一些人认为，垄断的市场可能导致创新停滞。

作文

In today's global economy, the concept of a monopolistic market structure plays a significant role in shaping the dynamics of competition and consumer choice. A monopolistic market is characterized by the presence of a single seller or producer that dominates the entire market, leading to a lack of competition. This dominance can result from various factors, including high barriers to entry for other firms, control over essential resources, or significant technological advantages. Understanding the implications of a monopolistic market is crucial for both consumers and policymakers.The primary concern with a monopolistic market is the potential for abuse of power by the dominant firm. Without competition, a monopolistic company can set prices higher than would be possible in a competitive market, as consumers have no alternative options. This can lead to reduced consumer welfare, as individuals may be forced to pay more for goods and services. Furthermore, a monopolistic firm may have less incentive to innovate or improve its products since it does not face pressure from competitors. As a result, the overall quality of goods and services may stagnate in a monopolistic environment.Moreover, monopolistic practices can extend beyond pricing strategies. A dominant firm may engage in predatory pricing, temporarily lowering prices to eliminate competitors and subsequently raising them once competition has been diminished. This cycle can create an unlevel playing field, making it nearly impossible for new entrants to survive in the market. In this way, the monopolistic nature of the industry can stifle innovation and limit choices available to consumers.From a regulatory perspective, governments often intervene in monopolistic markets to promote competition and protect consumer interests. Antitrust laws are designed to prevent the formation of monopolistic structures and to dismantle existing monopolies when necessary. For instance, historical cases such as the breakup of AT&T in the 1980s illustrate how government action can restore competition in a monopolistic industry. By breaking up large firms into smaller, more competitive entities, the market can become more vibrant, fostering innovation and better prices for consumers.However, regulating monopolistic practices is not without challenges. Determining what constitutes a monopoly and when intervention is warranted requires careful analysis and understanding of market dynamics. Additionally, some argue that certain industries, particularly those involving significant research and development costs, may benefit from a monopolistic structure that allows for sustained investment in innovation. In these cases, the challenge lies in finding the right balance between encouraging competition and providing firms with the stability needed to innovate.In conclusion, the implications of a monopolistic market structure are profound and far-reaching. While the existence of a monopolistic firm may provide certain efficiencies, the potential for abuse and negative impact on consumer welfare cannot be overlooked. It is essential for consumers, businesses, and policymakers to remain vigilant in monitoring monopolistic practices and to advocate for policies that promote competition and protect the interests of the public. Only through a balanced approach can we ensure that markets operate fairly and efficiently, ultimately benefiting society as a whole.

在当今全球经济中，垄断性市场结构的概念在塑造竞争和消费者选择的动态中扮演着重要角色。垄断性市场的特点是存在一个主导整个市场的单一卖方或生产者，导致缺乏竞争。这种主导地位可能源于多种因素，包括其他公司进入市场的高壁垒、对重要资源的控制或显著的技术优势。理解垄断性市场的影响对消费者和政策制定者至关重要。垄断性市场的主要问题是主导公司滥用权力的潜在风险。在没有竞争的情况下，垄断性公司可以设定比竞争市场更高的价格，因为消费者没有替代选择。这可能导致消费者福利降低，因为个人可能被迫为商品和服务支付更高的价格。此外，由于不面临竞争的压力，垄断性公司可能对创新或改善其产品的激励较小。因此，在垄断性环境中，商品和服务的整体质量可能停滞不前。此外，垄断性行为可以超越定价策略。主导公司可能会采取掠夺性定价，暂时降低价格以消除竞争对手，然后在竞争减少后再次提高价格。这一循环可能造成不平等的竞争环境，使新进入者几乎无法在市场中生存。通过这种方式，行业的垄断性特征可能抑制创新并限制消费者可获得的选择。从监管的角度来看，政府通常会干预垄断性市场，以促进竞争并保护消费者利益。反垄断法旨在防止形成垄断性结构，并在必要时解散现有的垄断。例如，20世纪80年代AT&T的拆分案例说明了政府行动如何恢复垄断性行业中的竞争。通过将大型公司拆分为较小、更具竞争力的实体，市场可以变得更加活跃，促进创新并为消费者提供更好的价格。然而，监管垄断性行为并非没有挑战。确定什么构成垄断以及何时需要干预需要仔细分析和对市场动态的理解。此外，有人认为某些行业，特别是涉及大量研发成本的行业，可能受益于允许持续投资创新的垄断性结构。在这些情况下，挑战在于找到鼓励竞争与为公司提供所需稳定性之间的正确平衡。总之，垄断性市场结构的影响深远而广泛。虽然垄断性公司的存在可能带来某些效率，但滥用权力和对消费者福利的负面影响也不能被忽视。消费者、企业和政策制定者必须保持警惕，监测垄断性行为，并倡导促进竞争和保护公众利益的政策。只有通过平衡的方法，我们才能确保市场公平有效地运作，最终使整个社会受益。