reviewer

简明释义

英[rɪˈvjuːə(r)]美[rɪˈvjuːər]

n. 评论者，评论家

复 数 r e v i e w e r s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Your reviewer bought a new one for $4, 000 in 1998.

笔者1998年花了4000美元购置了一辆新尼瓦。 刚买不久，车便失火了。

2.Process Rejection: a task with a role requirement of Reviewer, but no resource type specified.

ProcessRejection：具有角色需求Reviewer的任务，但是不指定任何资源类型。

3.Identifying the location and type of the design pattern helps the reviewer understand the source code.

识别设计模式的位置和类型能够帮助检查员理解源代码。

4.When they do, we print the form out so the reviewer can refer to it while testing.

他们发送后，我们还要打印表单，审核人员在测试时才能查阅。

5.He is a reviewer of technical journals and conferences and published more than 30 articles.

他是技术刊物、会议的评论家，发表论文超过30篇。

6.Execution of the staff assignment expression %htm:input.\input/reviewer%

通过执行成员赋值表达式 %htm:input.\input/reviewer% 来确定任务的所有者。

7.Data were extracted, tabulated and analysed with Reviewer Manager (RevMan) 4.3 software.

用ReviewerManager (RevMan) 4.3软件进行数据的提取、列表和分析。

8.As a reviewer 审稿人, she has to evaluate the quality of the manuscripts critically.

作为一名审稿人 审稿人，她必须批判性地评估手稿的质量。

9.Many reviewers 审稿人 prefer to remain anonymous to provide honest evaluations.

许多审稿人 审稿人 更喜欢保持匿名，以便提供诚实的评估。

10.The article was submitted to a peer-reviewed journal, and the reviewer 审稿人 provided valuable feedback.

这篇文章提交给了一本同行评审的期刊，审稿人 审稿人 提供了宝贵的反馈。

11.The reviewer 评论者 praised the author's innovative approach in the book.

这位评论者 评论者 赞扬了作者在书中的创新方法。

12.The reviewer's 审稿人的 comments were instrumental in improving the final draft of the paper.

这位审稿人的 审稿人的 评论对改善论文的最终草稿起到了重要作用。

作文

In today's fast-paced world, the role of a reviewer (审稿人) has become increasingly significant. Whether in the realms of literature, film, or academic research, reviewers (审稿人) play a crucial part in shaping public perception and guiding consumer choices. This essay will explore the responsibilities, challenges, and impact of reviewers (审稿人) across various fields, highlighting their importance in our society.Firstly, let's discuss the responsibilities of a reviewer (审稿人). In literature, for instance, a reviewer (审稿人) is tasked with evaluating a book's content, style, and overall contribution to the literary world. They must provide a fair and insightful analysis that not only reflects their personal opinions but also considers the expectations and tastes of potential readers. Similarly, in the film industry, a reviewer (审稿人) assesses the quality of a movie, examining elements such as acting, direction, cinematography, and storytelling. Their reviews can influence audience turnout and critical acclaim, making their role pivotal in the success of a film.In academia, the function of a reviewer (审稿人) is equally important. Here, reviewers (审稿人) evaluate research papers submitted to journals, ensuring that only high-quality work is published. They assess the originality, methodology, and significance of the research, providing constructive feedback to authors. This peer-review process is essential for maintaining the integrity and credibility of academic publishing, and it underscores the responsibility that comes with being a reviewer (审稿人).However, the role of a reviewer (审稿人) is not without its challenges. One major challenge is the pressure to remain objective while providing a personal opinion. A reviewer (审稿人) must navigate their biases and preferences, ensuring that their evaluations are balanced and fair. This can be particularly difficult in subjective fields like literature and film, where personal taste plays a significant role. Additionally, reviewers (审稿人) often face tight deadlines, requiring them to produce thorough and thoughtful critiques within a limited timeframe. This can lead to stress and burnout, especially for those who juggle multiple reviewing responsibilities.Despite these challenges, the impact of reviewers (审稿人) cannot be overstated. In literature, a positive review from a respected reviewer (审稿人) can catapult an unknown author to fame, while a negative one can hinder a promising career. In film, reviewers (审稿人) can make or break a movie's box office performance, influencing the decisions of potential viewers. In academia, the feedback provided by reviewers (审稿人) helps improve the quality of research, fostering innovation and progress in various fields.In conclusion, the role of a reviewer (审稿人) is multifaceted and vital across different domains. Their responsibilities involve providing honest and constructive critiques, while facing the challenges of objectivity and time constraints. The influence they wield can significantly affect public perception and the success of creative works. As we continue to consume literature, films, and academic research, we must recognize and appreciate the invaluable contributions of reviewers (审稿人) in our society.

在当今快节奏的世界中，reviewer（审稿人）的角色变得越来越重要。无论是在文学、电影还是学术研究领域，reviewers（审稿人）在塑造公众认知和指导消费者选择方面都发挥着至关重要的作用。本文将探讨reviewers（审稿人）在各个领域的责任、挑战及其影响，强调他们在我们社会中的重要性。首先，让我们讨论reviewer（审稿人）的责任。例如，在文学领域，reviewer（审稿人）负责评估一本书的内容、风格和对文学界的整体贡献。他们必须提供公正而深入的分析，不仅反映个人观点，还要考虑潜在读者的期望和口味。类似地，在电影行业，reviewer（审稿人）评估电影的质量，检查诸如表演、导演、摄影和叙述等元素。他们的评论可以影响观众的观看意愿和批评认可，使得他们在电影成功中扮演着关键角色。在学术界，reviewer（审稿人）的职能同样重要。在这里，reviewers（审稿人）评估提交给期刊的研究论文，确保只有高质量的作品被发表。他们评估研究的原创性、方法论和重要性，并向作者提供建设性的反馈。这一同行评审过程对于维护学术出版的诚信和可信度至关重要，也凸显了作为reviewer（审稿人）所承担的责任。然而，reviewer（审稿人）的角色并非没有挑战。其中一个主要挑战是保持客观，同时提供个人意见。reviewer（审稿人）必须克服自己的偏见和喜好，确保他们的评估是平衡和公正的。这在文学和电影等主观领域尤其困难，因为个人品味在其中扮演着重要角色。此外，reviewers（审稿人）通常面临紧迫的截止日期，需要在有限的时间内产生全面而深思熟虑的批评。这可能导致压力和倦怠，尤其是对于那些同时承担多项评审责任的人。尽管面临这些挑战，reviewers（审稿人）的影响力不可低估。在文学中，来自受人尊敬的reviewer（审稿人）的积极评价可以使一位不知名的作者迅速成名，而负面评价则可能阻碍一个有前途的职业。在电影中，reviewers（审稿人）可以决定一部电影的票房表现，影响潜在观众的选择。在学术界，reviewers（审稿人）提供的反馈有助于提高研究质量，促进各个领域的创新和进步。总之，reviewer（审稿人）的角色在不同领域是多方面的且至关重要。他们的责任包括提供诚实和建设性的批评，同时面临客观性和时间限制的挑战。他们的影响力可以显著影响公众认知和创作作品的成功。随着我们继续消费文学、电影和学术研究，我们必须认识到并欣赏reviewers（审稿人）在我们社会中的宝贵贡献。