cardinally

简明释义

英[ˈkɑːdɪnəli]美[ˈkɑrdənli]

最重要地

基本地

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Cardinally negative adverbs is one of the distinctive classifications in modern Chinese.

“根本”类否定性副词是现代汉语中很有特色的一个小类。

2.Cardinally negative adverbs is one of the distinctive classifications in modern Chinese.

“根本”类否定性副词是现代汉语中很有特色的一个小类。

3.In philosophy, the concept of truth can be analyzed cardinally 根本上 to understand its implications.

在哲学中，真理的概念可以<根本上>分析，以理解其含义。

4.The team evaluated the project cardinally 从根本上 to ensure all critical aspects were covered.

团队<从根本上>评估了项目，以确保所有关键方面都得到覆盖。

5.In mathematics, two numbers can be compared cardinally 基数上 to determine which is greater.

在数学中，两个数字可以<基数上>进行比较，以确定哪个更大。

6.When discussing the importance of education, we must consider its value cardinally 重要性上 in shaping society.

在讨论教育的重要性时，我们必须<重要性上>考虑它在塑造社会中的价值。

7.The researchers approached the problem cardinally 根本上, focusing on the essential factors that affect the outcome.

研究人员<根本上>处理这个问题，专注于影响结果的基本因素。

作文

In the study of philosophy, the concept of morality is often discussed in various contexts. However, one aspect that is *cardinally* important is the distinction between subjective and objective morality. Subjective morality suggests that moral judgments are based on personal feelings or opinions, while objective morality posits that there are universal moral truths that apply to all individuals regardless of their beliefs. This distinction is not merely academic; it has profound implications for how we understand ethical behavior in society. For instance, consider the issue of human rights. Many argue that human rights are *cardinally* essential to a just society. If we accept that these rights exist objectively, then we have a solid foundation for advocating against injustices. On the other hand, if we view them as subjective, we risk falling into relativism, where anything goes as long as someone believes it to be right. This could lead to a dangerous world where atrocities are justified by personal beliefs. Furthermore, the role of culture in shaping moral perspectives cannot be overlooked. Different cultures may have varying interpretations of what is considered moral or immoral. Yet, this cultural diversity does not negate the existence of *cardinally* important ethical principles that can transcend cultural boundaries. For example, the principle of not causing harm to others is widely accepted across many cultures, highlighting a potential universal standard of morality. When discussing moral philosophy, it is also crucial to address the implications of moral relativism. If morality is entirely subjective, then one might argue that actions like theft or murder could be justified under certain circumstances based on individual belief systems. This poses a significant challenge to the idea of law and order in society, which relies on shared moral standards to function effectively. Thus, the debate over the nature of morality is *cardinally* relevant to our legal systems and societal norms. Moreover, the impact of technological advancements on moral considerations is another area that requires attention. With the rise of artificial intelligence and biotechnology, new ethical dilemmas emerge that challenge our existing moral frameworks. Questions arise about the rights of AI entities, the ethics of genetic modification, and the implications of surveillance technologies. These issues underscore the *cardinally* important role of moral philosophy in guiding us through the complexities of modern life. In conclusion, understanding morality's subjective versus objective nature is *cardinally* significant for both personal conduct and societal governance. As we navigate an increasingly complex world, it is essential to engage with these philosophical questions critically. By doing so, we can work towards building a more just and equitable society, grounded in shared ethical principles that honor the dignity and rights of all individuals. The exploration of morality is not just an academic exercise; it is a fundamental aspect of what it means to be human, shaping our interactions and the world we create together.

在哲学研究中，道德的概念常常在各种背景下被讨论。然而，有一个方面是*根本上*重要的，那就是主观道德与客观道德之间的区别。主观道德认为道德判断基于个人的感受或观点，而客观道德则认为存在适用于所有个体的普遍道德真理，无论他们的信仰如何。这一区别并非仅仅是学术问题；它对我们理解社会中的伦理行为具有深远的影响。例如，考虑人权问题。许多人认为人权对公正社会是*根本上*必要的。如果我们接受这些权利是客观存在的，那么我们就有了坚实的基础来倡导反对不公正的行为。另一方面，如果我们将其视为主观的，那么我们就冒着陷入相对主义的风险，在那里只要有人相信某事是正确的，就可以做任何事情。这可能导致一个危险的世界，在这个世界里，暴行被个人信仰所辩护。此外，文化在塑造道德观念方面的作用也不可忽视。不同文化可能对什么被视为道德或不道德有不同的解释。然而，这种文化多样性并不否定那些能够超越文化界限的*根本上*重要的伦理原则的存在。例如，不伤害他人的原则在许多文化中得到广泛接受，突显出道德的潜在普遍标准。在讨论道德哲学时，必须解决道德相对主义的影响。如果道德完全是主观的，那么人们可能会争辩说，在某些情况下，偷窃或谋杀的行为可以根据个人信仰体系进行辩护。这对社会中的法律和秩序构成了重大挑战，而法律和秩序依赖于共享的道德标准才能有效运作。因此，关于道德本质的辩论对于我们的法律体系和社会规范是*根本上*相关的。此外，技术进步对道德考量的影响是另一个需要关注的领域。随着人工智能和生物技术的兴起，新的伦理困境出现，挑战着我们现有的道德框架。关于人工智能实体的权利、基因修改的伦理以及监控技术的影响等问题浮出水面。这些问题突显了道德哲学在引导我们应对现代生活复杂性方面的*根本上*重要角色。总之，理解道德的主观与客观性质对个人行为和社会治理是*根本上*重要的。随着我们在日益复杂的世界中航行，批判性地参与这些哲学问题至关重要。通过这样做，我们可以朝着建立一个更加公正和平等的社会迈进，基于尊重所有个体尊严和权利的共享伦理原则。对道德的探索不仅仅是学术练习；它是作为人类的基本方面，塑造着我们的互动和我们共同创造的世界。