jammers

简明释义

英[ˈdʒæməz]美[ˈdʒæmərz]

干扰发射台

n. （Jammers）人名；（德）雅默斯

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.This paper analyzes the basic features and characteristics of chaff, describes the radar testing technologies of such passive jammers, and discusses the development trend of these jammers.

详细分析箔条干扰物的基本性质和特性，介绍雷达无源干扰物效果检测技术，综述雷达无源干扰物的发展趋势。

2.Over the years, many electronics manufacturers have taken to producing all sorts of laser, radar and infrared jammers.

多年以来，许多电子制造商开始生产各种激光、雷达、红外防护罩。

3.The CREW 2.1 jammers are being built at ITT's Electronic Systems facility in Thousand Oaks, Calif.

CREW 2.1干扰机将在位于加利福尼亚thousand Oaks的ITT的电子系统工厂进行生产。

4.Jammers, circuit jacks, whatever you need.

干扰发射台，电路千斤顶，所有你需要的。

5.The spread spectrum communication with an aperiodic PN code and under strong man-made jammers has an important significance in military communications.

强人为干扰环境下的非周期扩频码的扩频通信在军事上具有重要的意义。

6.The matched model of the requirement for the number of jammers and auxiliary antennas are first discussed, and the corresponding cancellation performance is simulated explicitly.

首次提出了干扰源数与对消阵元数“匹配”的概念，并分析了系统在“匹配”工作模式下可能具有的对消能力。

7.Cameras on high sweep , armed guards , comm jammers.

高速扫描摄像头，武装警卫，通讯干扰。

8.This paper deduces the equation of jamming airborne early warning radar with multi-jammer, simulates the target exposed area that multi-system joint jammers jam the airborne early warning radar.

推导了多部干扰机干扰空中预警雷达的干扰方程，仿真了多系统联合干扰机载预警雷达时目标的暴露区。

9.They installed jammers in the theater to ensure no one could use their phones during the show.

他们在剧院安装了干扰器，以确保在表演期间没有人可以使用手机。

10.The military often employs jammers to protect sensitive information.

军方经常使用干扰器来保护敏感信息。

11.The conference room was equipped with jammers to prevent unauthorized recordings.

会议室配备了干扰器以防止未经授权的录音。

12.The police used jammers to disrupt the communication of the criminals.

警方使用干扰器来破坏罪犯的通信。

13.In some areas, mobile phone jammers are illegal due to safety concerns.

在某些地区，出于安全考虑，手机干扰器是非法的。

作文

In today's world, technology plays a crucial role in our daily lives. One of the fascinating aspects of this technological advancement is the development of devices that can interfere with communication signals. These devices are commonly known as jammers, which are used to disrupt or block wireless communications. The use of jammers has raised various concerns, particularly regarding their legality and ethical implications. Firstly, it is essential to understand what jammers do. They emit signals that interfere with the frequencies used by mobile phones, GPS devices, and other wireless communication systems. For instance, in situations where privacy is paramount, such as in conferences or sensitive meetings, individuals may choose to use jammers to prevent unauthorized listening or recording of conversations. This can be seen as a protective measure, ensuring that confidential information remains secure. However, the use of jammers is not without controversy. Many countries have strict regulations governing their use. In the United States, for example, it is illegal to operate a jammer that disrupts licensed communications. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) enforces these laws to protect public safety and ensure that emergency services can communicate effectively. The potential for misuse of jammers is significant; for instance, if someone were to use a jammer in a crowded area, it could prevent emergency calls from being made, endangering lives. Moreover, the ethical implications of using jammers cannot be overlooked. While some may argue that they are necessary for privacy, others contend that they infringe upon the rights of individuals to communicate freely. The balance between security and freedom is a delicate one, and the use of jammers often tips this balance in favor of secrecy at the expense of openness. In addition to privacy concerns, jammers also have implications for businesses. Companies might consider using jammers to protect their intellectual property during product launches or while discussing sensitive information. However, this practice could backfire if employees or clients are unable to use their devices for legitimate purposes. The disruption caused by jammers could lead to frustration and a breakdown of trust between parties involved. On a broader scale, the proliferation of jammers raises questions about the future of communication technology. As society becomes increasingly reliant on wireless communication, the potential for disruption grows. Developers of communication systems must find ways to make their technologies more resilient against interference from jammers. This challenge will likely drive innovation in the field, leading to new solutions that can coexist with these disruptive devices. In conclusion, jammers are a double-edged sword in the realm of technology. While they offer a means of protecting privacy and securing sensitive information, their potential for misuse poses significant risks. The legal and ethical considerations surrounding jammers must be carefully weighed to ensure that the benefits do not come at the cost of public safety and communication integrity. As we navigate this complex landscape, it is vital to foster open discussions about the appropriate use of jammers and to develop policies that balance the need for privacy with the necessity of maintaining effective communication channels. Ultimately, the future of jammers in our society will depend on how we choose to address these challenges and the values we prioritize in our increasingly connected world.

在当今世界，技术在我们日常生活中发挥着至关重要的作用。这个技术进步的一个迷人方面是开发可以干扰通信信号的设备。这些设备通常被称为干扰器，用于破坏或阻止无线通信。干扰器的使用引发了各种担忧，特别是关于其合法性和伦理含义。首先，了解干扰器的作用至关重要。它们发出干扰信号，干扰移动电话、GPS设备和其他无线通信系统使用的频率。例如，在隐私至关重要的情况下，如会议或敏感会议，个人可能选择使用干扰器以防止未经授权的监听或录音。这可以被视为一种保护措施，确保机密信息保持安全。然而，使用干扰器并非没有争议。许多国家对其使用有严格的规定。在美国，例如，操作干扰合法通信的干扰器是非法的。联邦通信委员会（FCC）执行这些法律，以保护公共安全并确保紧急服务能够有效沟通。干扰器的潜在滥用是显著的；例如，如果某人在拥挤的地方使用干扰器，可能会阻止紧急呼叫，使生命处于危险之中。此外，使用干扰器的伦理含义也不容忽视。虽然一些人可能会争辩说它们对于隐私是必要的，但另一些人则认为它们侵犯了个人自由沟通的权利。安全与自由之间的平衡是微妙的，而使用干扰器往往使这一平衡倾向于秘密，而牺牲了开放性。除了隐私问题，干扰器对企业也有影响。公司可能考虑在产品发布或讨论敏感信息时使用干扰器来保护其知识产权。然而，这种做法可能适得其反，因为员工或客户可能无法合法使用他们的设备。干扰器造成的干扰可能导致挫败感以及相关方之间的信任崩溃。在更广泛的层面上，干扰器的普及引发了关于通信技术未来的问题。随着社会越来越依赖无线通信，干扰的潜力也在增长。通信系统的开发者必须找到方法，使他们的技术更具抵御干扰器干扰的能力。这个挑战可能会推动该领域的创新，导致可以与这些破坏性设备共存的新解决方案。总之，干扰器在技术领域是把双刃剑。虽然它们提供了一种保护隐私和确保敏感信息的手段，但它们的潜在滥用也带来了重大风险。围绕干扰器的法律和伦理考虑必须谨慎权衡，以确保好处不会以公共安全和通信完整性的代价为代价。当我们导航这个复杂的环境时，促进关于干扰器适当使用的公开讨论以及制定平衡隐私需求与维护有效沟通渠道的政策至关重要。最终，干扰器在我们社会中的未来将取决于我们如何选择应对这些挑战，以及我们在日益互联的世界中优先考虑的价值观。