bombast

简明释义

英[ˈbɒmbæst]美[ˈbɑːmbæst]

n. 夸大的言辞

adj. 夸大的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.His speech was full of bombast.

他的讲演通篇是夸夸其谈。

2.Edison's bombast strains Pandora's marriage and disturbs the balance of her life, especially after she hatches a dramatic plan to slim him down in order to save him.

爱迪生的夸夸其谈使潘多拉的婚姻关系变得紧张，扰乱了她平静的生活，尤其是为了挽救哥哥，潘多拉想出了一个戏剧性的方案来帮他减肥，这之后一切更是乱了套。

3.So, beneath the bombast, is this a new “east of Suez” moment?

因此，夸夸其谈的背后是不是新的“苏伊士以东”时刻的到来？

4.Not everyone was convinced by such bombast.

并不是每个人都相信这种夸大其词。

5.Edison's bombast strains Pandora's marriage and disturbs the balance of her life, especially after she hatches a dramatic plan to slim him down in order to save him.

爱迪生的夸夸其谈使潘多拉的婚姻关系变得紧张，扰乱了她平静的生活，尤其是为了挽救哥哥，潘多拉想出了一个戏剧性的方案来帮他减肥，这之后一切更是乱了套。

6.So, beneath the bombast, is this a new "east of Suez" moment?

因此，夸夸其谈的背后是不是新的“苏伊士以东”时刻的到来？

7.There was no bombast or conceit in his speech.

他的发言里没有浮夸或自负。

8.Dear Word Detective: What's the origin of the word "bombast"? -- Uptiteallnite, via the internet.

侦探先生,您能否告诉我单词bombast的由来?

9.Her bombast in the debate overshadowed her actual arguments.

她在辩论中的夸夸其谈掩盖了她的实际论点。

10.The politician's speech was filled with bombast, making grand claims without any evidence.

这位政治家的演讲充满了夸夸其谈，做出宏大的声明却没有任何证据。

11.Despite the bombast of his presentation, the audience remained unconvinced.

尽管他的演示充满了夸张的言辞，观众仍然不为所动。

12.The article was full of bombast, making it difficult to extract any real information.

这篇文章充满了华丽的辞藻，使得难以提取任何真实的信息。

13.The novel was criticized for its bombast and lack of substance.

这部小说因其华丽的辞藻和缺乏实质内容而受到批评。

作文

In the realm of public speaking and writing, one often encounters various styles and tones that can either captivate an audience or alienate them. Among these styles, there exists a particular tendency toward exaggerated language known as bombast. This term refers to speech or writing that is pompous and inflated, often filled with grandiose words that serve more to impress than to inform. While some may argue that bombast can add flair to communication, it often detracts from the clarity and sincerity that effective discourse requires.To illustrate the pitfalls of bombast, one need only look at certain political speeches throughout history. Politicians frequently employ bombast to rally support, using lofty rhetoric and hyperbolic claims to evoke strong emotions. For instance, during election campaigns, candidates may promise sweeping reforms and unprecedented change, employing elaborate language that sounds impressive but lacks substance. This reliance on bombast can lead to disillusionment among voters when the promised changes fail to materialize, highlighting the dangers of prioritizing style over substance.Moreover, the use of bombast can create barriers between the speaker and the audience. When individuals resort to overly complex language and grandiloquent phrases, they risk losing their listeners' attention and understanding. Effective communication should strive for clarity and accessibility, allowing ideas to resonate with a broader audience. By contrast, bombast often alienates those who may feel intimidated or confused by the ostentatious vocabulary being used.In academic writing, bombast can similarly hinder the pursuit of knowledge. Scholars who indulge in unnecessarily complicated language may obscure their ideas, making it difficult for readers to grasp the core message. The true essence of academic discourse lies in the ability to convey complex concepts in a clear and concise manner. Therefore, avoiding bombast is essential for fostering productive dialogue and advancing understanding within any field of study.While it is important to recognize the role of eloquence in communication, one must be cautious not to cross the line into bombast. There is a fine balance between being articulate and being ostentatious. Effective communicators know how to engage their audience without resorting to inflated language. They choose their words carefully, aiming for precision and clarity rather than mere showmanship.In conclusion, while bombast may seem appealing at first glance, it ultimately undermines effective communication. Whether in politics, academia, or everyday conversation, the emphasis should always be on clarity, sincerity, and engagement. By steering clear of bombast, speakers and writers can foster genuine connections with their audience, ensuring that their messages are not only heard but also understood and appreciated. The goal of communication should always be to enlighten and inform, rather than to dazzle with empty rhetoric. Thus, embracing simplicity and authenticity will lead to more meaningful exchanges in all forms of discourse.

在公共演讲和写作的领域中，人们常常会遇到各种风格和语调，这些风格和语调可以吸引观众或使他们疏远。在这些风格中，存在一种对夸张语言的倾向，称为bombast。这个词指的是那种华而不实、夸大其词的演讲或写作，通常充满了华丽的词汇，这些词汇更多的是为了给人留下深刻印象，而不是为了提供信息。虽然有些人可能会认为bombast可以为交流增添色彩，但它往往会削弱有效话语所需的清晰度和真诚感。为了说明bombast的陷阱，人们只需看看历史上某些政治演讲。政治家们经常使用bombast来聚集支持，使用高尚的修辞和夸张的说法来激发强烈的情感。例如，在选举活动中，候选人可能承诺进行广泛的改革和前所未有的变化，使用华丽的语言听起来令人印象深刻，但缺乏实质内容。这种依赖于bombast的做法可能导致选民的失望，因为所承诺的变化未能实现，突显了将风格置于实质之上的危险。此外，使用bombast可能会在演讲者和观众之间制造障碍。当个人诉诸于过于复杂的语言和华丽的短语时，他们可能会失去听众的注意力和理解力。有效的沟通应该追求清晰和可达性，使思想能够与更广泛的受众产生共鸣。相比之下，bombast往往使那些可能感到被浮夸的词汇所威胁或困惑的人感到疏远。在学术写作中，bombast同样会妨碍知识的追求。那些沉溺于不必要复杂语言的学者可能会模糊他们的观点，使读者难以理解核心信息。学术话语的真正本质在于能够以清晰简明的方式传达复杂概念。因此，避免bombast对于促进富有成效的对话和推动任何学科的理解至关重要。虽然认识到雄辩在沟通中的作用是重要的，但人们必须谨慎，不要越过进入bombast的界限。优雅与炫耀之间有一个微妙的平衡。有效的沟通者知道如何在不诉诸于夸大的语言的情况下吸引他们的观众。他们仔细选择自己的词汇，旨在追求精确和清晰，而不是单纯的表演。总之，虽然bombast乍一看似乎很吸引人，但它最终会削弱有效的沟通。无论是在政治、学术还是日常对话中，重点始终应放在清晰、真诚和参与上。通过避免bombast，演讲者和作者可以与他们的观众建立真正的联系，确保他们的信息不仅被听到，而且被理解和欣赏。沟通的目标应始终是启迪和告知，而不是用空洞的修辞来炫耀。因此，拥抱简单和真实将导致所有形式的话语中更有意义的交流。