despotic

简明释义

英[dɪˈspɒtɪk]美[dɪˈspɑːtɪk]

adj. 暴虐的，暴君的；专横的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Our headmaster is a despotic person.

我们的校长是个专横的人。

2.We just can't stand despotic clauses like this.

条款，我们就是气不忿儿！

3.Henry VIII is known as the despotic ginger-haired, heavy-set monarch who loved a good wedding.

亨利八世被公认为专横的黄头发的魁梧君主，他喜欢好的婚礼。

4.Our headmaster is a despotic person.

我们的校长是个跋扈的人。

5.Henry VIII is known as the despotic ginger-haired, heavy-set monarch who loved a good wedding.

亨利八世被公认为专横的黄头发的魁梧君主，他喜欢好的婚礼。

6.How right you are to affirm our "long-standing practice" of despotic rule.

您承认我们这里有“长期存在”的暴啊君统治，您说的太对了。

7.He was a despotic emperor.

他是一个暴君。

8.The country was ruled by a despotic tyrant.

该国家被一位专横的暴君统治着。

9.Critics argue that the new laws are a step towards a more despotic 专制的 rule.

批评者认为新法律是走向更为专制的统治的一步。

10.Many people fled the nation to escape the despotic 专制的 government.

许多人逃离这个国家以逃避专制的政府。

11.The despotic 专制的 leader silenced all opposition with brutal force.

这位专制的领导者用残酷的力量压制所有反对派。

12.The ruler's despotic 专制的 regime led to widespread protests across the country.

统治者的专制的政权导致全国范围内的大规模抗议。

13.In a despotic 专制的 system, citizens often have little to no say in government decisions.

在一个专制的体制中，公民往往对政府决策几乎没有发言权。

作文

Throughout history, the concept of power has often been associated with the idea of control and authority. In many societies, leaders have wielded their power in ways that can be described as despotic, meaning they exercise absolute power in a cruel and oppressive manner. This type of governance is not only detrimental to the well-being of the populace but also stifles creativity, innovation, and progress. In this essay, I will explore the implications of despotic leadership through various historical examples and its impact on society.One of the most notable examples of despotic rule can be seen in the reign of King Louis XIV of France, who famously declared, "L'état, c'est moi" (I am the state). His centralized control over France exemplified despotic governance, as he made decisions that affected millions without any input from his subjects. The lavish lifestyle and extravagant spending of Louis XIV led to significant financial strain on the country, ultimately contributing to the conditions that sparked the French Revolution. The consequences of his despotic rule highlight how unchecked power can lead to societal unrest and dramatic change.Similarly, in the 20th century, we witnessed the rise of despotic regimes across the globe. Leaders like Joseph Stalin in the Soviet Union and Adolf Hitler in Germany exercised their power through fear and oppression. Stalin's purges eliminated perceived threats to his authority, resulting in the deaths of millions. Meanwhile, Hitler's totalitarian regime led to horrific atrocities during the Holocaust. These leaders maintained their grip on power by instilling fear and suppressing dissent, demonstrating the dark side of despotic governance.The impact of despotic leadership extends beyond immediate political ramifications. Societies under such regimes often experience a decline in civil liberties, human rights, and freedom of expression. Citizens may live in constant fear of persecution, leading to a culture of silence where individuals are reluctant to voice their opinions or challenge the status quo. This suppression of dissent can stifle intellectual growth and innovation, as people are discouraged from thinking critically or creatively.In contrast, democratic societies that promote freedom and equality tend to flourish. They encourage participation, dialogue, and the exchange of ideas, leading to progress and development. The stark difference between despotic and democratic governance illustrates the importance of checks and balances in leadership. When leaders are held accountable for their actions, it fosters an environment where citizens can thrive.In conclusion, the term despotic encapsulates a form of leadership that is characterized by absolute power and oppression. Historical examples such as Louis XIV, Stalin, and Hitler serve as reminders of the dangers posed by such regimes. The consequences of despotic governance are profound, affecting not only the political landscape but also the cultural and social fabric of society. As we reflect on these lessons from history, it becomes evident that promoting democratic values and protecting individual freedoms are essential in preventing the rise of despotic leaders in the future.

在历史上，权力的概念常常与控制和权威的想法相关联。在许多社会中，领导者以一种可以被描述为专制的方式行使他们的权力，这意味着他们以残酷和压迫的方式行使绝对权力。这种治理方式不仅对民众的福祉有害，而且还扼杀了创造力、创新和进步。在这篇文章中，我将通过各种历史例子探讨专制的领导的影响及其对社会的影响。一个最显著的专制的统治的例子可以在法国国王路易十四的统治中看到，他曾著名地宣称：“国家就是我。”他对法国的中央集权控制体现了专制的治理，因为他做出的决定影响了数百万人的生活，而没有任何来自臣民的意见。路易十四奢华的生活方式和奢侈的开支导致了国家的重大财政压力，最终促成了引发法国大革命的条件。他的专制的统治的后果突显了不受制约的权力如何导致社会动荡和戏剧性的变化。同样，在20世纪，我们目睹了全球范围内专制的政权的崛起。像苏联的约瑟夫·斯大林和德国的阿道夫·希特勒这样的领导人在恐惧和压迫中行使他们的权力。斯大林的清洗消除了对他权威的潜在威胁，导致了数百万人的死亡。与此同时，希特勒的极权主义政权在大屠杀期间导致了可怕的暴行。这些领导人通过灌输恐惧和压制异议来维持对权力的控制，展示了专制的治理的黑暗面。专制的领导的影响超出了直接的政治后果。处于这种政权下的社会往往经历公民自由、人权和言论自由的下降。公民可能生活在对迫害的持续恐惧中，导致一种沉默的文化，个人不愿意表达自己的意见或挑战现状。这种对异议的压制可能会扼杀智力增长和创新，因为人们不被鼓励进行批判性或创造性的思考。相比之下，促进自由和平等的民主社会往往蓬勃发展。它们鼓励参与、对话和思想的交流，从而推动进步和发展。专制的治理和民主治理之间的鲜明对比说明了领导中制衡的重要性。当领导者对其行为负责时，就会培养出一个公民能够茁壮成长的环境。总之，专制的这个词概括了一种以绝对权力和压迫为特征的领导形式。路易十四、斯大林和希特勒等历史例子提醒我们这种政权带来的危险。专制的治理的后果是深远的，不仅影响政治格局，还影响社会和文化的结构。当我们反思历史中的这些教训时，显而易见的是，促进民主价值观和保护个人自由对于防止未来出现专制的领导者至关重要。