absolutist
简明释义
英[ˈæbsəluːtɪst]美[ˈæbsəluːtɪst]
n. 绝对论者;专制主义者
adj. (与)极权主义(有关)的
英英释义
A person who holds absolute principles in political, philosophical, or theological matters. | 在政治、哲学或神学事务中持有绝对原则的人。 |
绝对政府或权威的倡导者。 |
单词用法
绝对主义政权 | |
绝对主义哲学 | |
绝对统治 | |
绝对政府 |
同义词
反义词
相对主义者 | The relativist perspective allows for multiple viewpoints on truth. | 相对主义的观点允许对真理有多种看法。 | |
多元主义者 | A pluralist society embraces diversity and multiple beliefs. | 一个多元化的社会包容多样性和多种信仰。 |
例句
1.You don't forget such episodes-the truly innocent at the mercy of the truly evil-and they lead directly into the absolutist morals of Larsson's books, which may also be a powerful selling point.
无辜者的命运任由恶魔来支配,书中类似的情境让人过目难忘,从而使拉赫松的三部曲呈现出绝对论的道德观,不过这同时也是这套小说强大的卖点之一。
2.Though philosophers have a natural penchant for being, Absolutists when they write about education, it is surprisingly hard to find good examples of this position-was Plato an Absolutist?
虽然哲学家作为人有一种自然的喜好,但绝对主义者当他们论述教育时,令人称奇的是在这一观点上很难发现一个好的例子——柏拉图是一个绝对主义者吗?
3."That underscored to me how absolutist Alan was in his opposition to any regulation," she said in the interview.
“它突出表现出阿兰反对任何管束的立场是完全彻底的”,她在访问中说。
4.This absolutist belief is replaced by an appreciation that rules can vary.
这种绝对主义的信念被规则可以变通的认识所取代。
5.The philosophy of Objectivism also takes a morally absolutist stance, as it regards the laws of morality to be, like the laws of physics, inherent in the universe itself.
客观主义哲学也站在道德绝对主义立场上,认为道德律令,与自然规律一样是内在于宇宙之中的。
6.She does not take the absolutist view that companies should strive only to maximise profits while obeying the rules.
然而,伯恩斯坦并没有独断地认为公司的目标就只是在遵守规则的前提下实现利润最大化。
7.Many historical figures were absolutist 专制主义者, ruling without any checks on their power.
许多历史人物都是absolutist 专制主义者,统治时没有任何权力制衡。
8.In an absolutist 专制主义者 regime, dissent is often met with harsh penalties.
在一个absolutist 专制主义者政权中,异议通常会受到严厉的惩罚。
9.The king was an absolutist 专制主义者, believing that his authority came directly from divine right.
国王是一个absolutist 专制主义者,相信他的权力直接来自于神授。
10.An absolutist 专制主义者 leader may suppress freedom of speech to maintain control.
一个absolutist 专制主义者领导者可能会压制言论自由以保持控制。
11.The philosopher criticized the absolutist 专制主义者 approach to governance, advocating for more democratic principles.
这位哲学家批评了absolutist 专制主义者的治理方式,倡导更民主的原则。
作文
In the realm of political philosophy, the term absolutist refers to a person who advocates for absolute power or authority in governance. An absolutist believes that a single ruler or governing body should have total control over the state, often without the constraints of laws or democratic processes. This concept has been historically significant, particularly during the era of monarchies where kings and queens ruled with an iron fist, claiming divine right or other justifications for their unchallenged authority.The idea of absolutist governance can be traced back to various historical figures, such as Louis XIV of France, who famously declared, 'L'état, c'est moi' (I am the state). This statement encapsulates the essence of absolutist rule, where the monarch embodies the state and wields unrestrained power. Such a system often leads to a lack of accountability, as the ruler is not beholden to any legislative body or public opinion.However, the implications of absolutist governance extend beyond mere political structures; they also influence societal norms and individual freedoms. Under an absolutist regime, the rights of citizens are frequently suppressed, as dissent is seen as a threat to the stability and authority of the ruler. This suppression can manifest in various forms, including censorship, imprisonment, or even violence against those who oppose the regime.Despite its drawbacks, some argue that absolutist governance can lead to stability and order, especially in times of crisis. For instance, in situations where democratic processes are slow or ineffective, having a decisive leader can provide quick solutions. Yet, this perspective raises ethical questions about the balance between security and freedom. Is it justifiable to sacrifice individual liberties for the sake of national stability? This debate continues to resonate in contemporary discussions about governance and authority.In modern contexts, the term absolutist is sometimes used more broadly to describe individuals or groups that hold rigid, uncompromising views on various issues, whether they be political, social, or ideological. Such absolutist positions can hinder constructive dialogue and compromise, which are essential in a diverse society. The challenge lies in finding a middle ground where differing perspectives can coexist without resorting to authoritarian measures.In conclusion, the concept of absolutist governance serves as a reminder of the potential dangers of concentrated power. While it may offer short-term benefits in terms of decisiveness and order, the long-term consequences often include the erosion of personal freedoms and democratic principles. As we navigate the complexities of modern governance, it is crucial to remain vigilant against absolutist tendencies, advocating instead for systems that promote accountability, transparency, and the protection of individual rights. Ultimately, the health of a society depends on its ability to engage in open dialogue and embrace a diversity of viewpoints, rather than succumbing to the allure of absolute authority.
在政治哲学领域,术语absolutist指的是主张治理中绝对权力或权威的人。absolutist认为,单一统治者或治理机构应对国家拥有完全控制权,往往不受法律或民主程序的约束。这个概念在历史上具有重要意义,尤其是在君主制时代,国王和女王以铁腕统治,声称神圣权利或其他理由来为其无可挑战的权威辩护。absolutist治理的思想可以追溯到许多历史人物,例如法国的路易十四,他曾著名地宣称:“国家就是我”。这一声明概括了absolutist统治的本质,君主体现了国家,拥有不受限制的权力。这种制度往往导致缺乏问责,因为统治者不需要对任何立法机构或公众舆论负责。然而,absolutist治理的影响不仅限于政治结构,它们还影响社会规范和个人自由。在absolutist政权下,公民的权利常常受到压制,因为异议被视为对统治者稳定和权威的威胁。这种压制可能以多种形式表现出来,包括审查、监禁甚至针对反对派的暴力行为。尽管存在缺陷,但一些人认为,absolutist治理可以在危机时期带来稳定和秩序。例如,在民主程序缓慢或无效的情况下,拥有一个果断的领导者可以提供快速解决方案。然而,这种观点引发了关于安全与自由之间平衡的伦理问题。为了国家稳定,牺牲个人自由是否合理?这一辩论在当代关于治理和权威的讨论中继续引起共鸣。在现代背景下,术语absolutist有时更广泛地用于描述在各种问题上持有僵化、毫不妥协观点的个人或团体,无论是政治、社会还是意识形态。这种absolutist立场可能阻碍建设性的对话和妥协,而这些在多元化社会中至关重要。挑战在于找到一个中间立场,使不同的观点能够共存,而不诉诸于专制措施。总之,absolutist治理的概念提醒我们,集权权力的潜在危险。虽然它可能在决策和秩序方面提供短期利益,但长期后果往往包括个人自由和民主原则的侵蚀。在我们应对现代治理的复杂性时,保持警惕,反对absolutist倾向是至关重要的,而应倡导促进问责制、透明度和保护个人权利的制度。最终,一个社会的健康取决于其进行开放对话和包容多样观点的能力,而不是屈服于绝对权威的诱惑。