dogmatism

简明释义

英[ˈdɒɡmətɪzəm]美[ˈdɔːɡmətɪzəm]

n. 教条主义；独断，武断

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.In some cases what is attacked as "dogmatism" is in fact mistakes in work.

有些被攻击的“教条主义”，实际上是一些工作上的错误。

2.Students in the laughter of the dogmatism of knowledge.

学生在笑声中认识了教条主义的危害。

3.Dogmatism should be criticized, or else many mistakes cannot be rectified.

教条主义应当受到批判，不批判教条主义，许多错事不能改正。

4.That is why we have been concentrating on combatting subjectivism, which has two aspects: dogmatism and empiricism.

反对主观主义有两个方面，即反对教条主义和反对经验主义。

5.Over the last few months, people have been criticizing dogmatism but have allowed revisionism to go unchallenged.

几个月以来，人们都在批判教条主义，却放过了修正主义。

6.However, he catches obvious dogmatism and often neglects the creative experience.

一个染上明显的教条主义，常常“忘记”创作经验。

7.Is it desirable to avoid dogmatism in teaching?

教学应否避免教条主义？

8.The author does not oppose introduction of new theories of historiography, but opposes dogmatism.

作者不反对引进新史学理论，但反对教条主义；

9.In science, dogmatism (教条主义) can hinder progress and discovery.

在科学领域，dogmatism (教条主义)可能会阻碍进步和发现。

10.Her dogmatism (教条主义) in religious beliefs often alienates others.

她在宗教信仰上的dogmatism (教条主义)常常使别人感到疏远。

11.The professor's dogmatism (教条主义) prevented him from accepting new theories.

这位教授的dogmatism (教条主义)使他无法接受新的理论。

12.The team struggled to innovate due to the dogmatism (教条主义) of its leadership.

由于领导层的dogmatism (教条主义)，团队在创新方面遇到了困难。

13.His dogmatism (教条主义) about politics makes it difficult to have a rational discussion.

他在政治上的dogmatism (教条主义)使得进行理性的讨论变得困难。

作文

In today's world, we are often confronted with a multitude of perspectives on various issues, ranging from politics to science. However, one significant barrier to understanding and progress is the phenomenon of dogmatism. 教条主义 refers to the tendency to hold onto beliefs rigidly, without considering alternative viewpoints or evidence. This mindset can be particularly detrimental in discussions that require open-mindedness and critical thinking.Take, for instance, the realm of scientific inquiry. Science thrives on questioning established norms and seeking new evidence. However, when scientists or researchers display dogmatism, they may dismiss new findings that contradict their long-held beliefs. This can stifle innovation and hinder the advancement of knowledge. A historical example of this is the initial resistance to the theory of heliocentrism, which proposed that the Earth revolves around the Sun. Many scholars held onto the geocentric view, demonstrating a clear case of dogmatism that delayed acceptance of a revolutionary idea.Moreover, dogmatism is not limited to academia; it permeates everyday life and societal discourse. In political debates, for instance, individuals often cling to their party lines with unwavering loyalty, refusing to consider opposing arguments. This polarization can lead to a toxic environment where constructive dialogue is replaced by hostility and division. When people engage in dogmatism, they miss valuable opportunities for collaboration and compromise, which are essential for a functioning democracy.Another area where dogmatism proves harmful is in personal relationships. People may hold onto rigid beliefs about others based on stereotypes or past experiences, preventing them from forming genuine connections. Such attitudes can foster misunderstanding and conflict, as individuals become entrenched in their views rather than embracing empathy and understanding. To combat this, it is crucial to practice active listening and remain open to different perspectives, recognizing that everyone has unique experiences that shape their beliefs.The antidote to dogmatism lies in cultivating a mindset of curiosity and humility. By acknowledging that our understanding of the world is limited, we can approach conversations with a willingness to learn. Embracing uncertainty and being open to change allows us to navigate complex issues more effectively. Encouraging environments that promote questioning and critical thinking can help mitigate the effects of dogmatism in both educational settings and the workplace.In conclusion, dogmatism poses significant challenges across various domains of life. Whether in science, politics, or personal relationships, the refusal to entertain alternative viewpoints can lead to stagnation and conflict. By fostering a culture of open-mindedness and critical inquiry, we can overcome the limitations imposed by dogmatism and work towards a more inclusive and progressive society. Ultimately, it is our ability to question our own beliefs and engage with others that will drive meaningful change in the world.

在当今世界，我们常常面临各种问题的多种视角，从政治到科学。然而，一个阻碍理解和进步的重要障碍就是教条主义。教条主义指的是一种固执地坚持信念的倾向，而不考虑替代观点或证据。这种心态在需要开放思维和批判性思维的讨论中尤其有害。以科学探究领域为例。科学依赖于质疑既定规范并寻求新证据。然而，当科学家或研究者表现出教条主义时，他们可能会忽视与自己长期信仰相悖的新发现。这可能抑制创新，阻碍知识的进步。一个历史例子是最初对日心说的抵制，该理论提出地球围绕太阳转动。许多学者坚持地心说，明显展示了教条主义的案例，这延迟了对这一革命性思想的接受。此外，教条主义不仅限于学术界；它渗透到日常生活和社会话语中。在政治辩论中，例如，个人往往毫不动摇地坚持自己的党派立场，拒绝考虑对立的论点。这种两极分化可能导致一种有毒的环境，在这种环境中，建设性的对话被敌意和分裂所取代。当人们参与教条主义时，他们错过了合作和妥协的宝贵机会，而这些对于一个运作良好的民主制度至关重要。教条主义造成危害的另一个领域是个人关系。人们可能基于刻板印象或过去的经历，对他人抱有僵化的信念，从而阻止他们建立真正的联系。这种态度可能导致误解和冲突，因为个人变得固执己见，而不是拥抱同理心和理解。为了应对这一点，积极倾听和保持对不同观点的开放至关重要，认识到每个人都有独特的经历塑造他们的信念。克服教条主义的解药在于培养好奇心和谦逊的心态。通过承认我们对世界的理解是有限的，我们可以以学习的意愿接近对话。拥抱不确定性并对变化持开放态度，使我们能够更有效地应对复杂问题。鼓励促进质疑和批判性思维的环境，可以帮助减轻教条主义在教育环境和工作场所的影响。总之，教条主义在生活的各个领域都带来了重大挑战。无论是在科学、政治还是个人关系中，拒绝考虑替代观点可能导致停滞和冲突。通过培养开放思维和批判性探究的文化，我们可以克服教条主义所带来的局限性，朝着一个更具包容性和进步的社会努力。最终，我们质疑自己信念并与他人互动的能力，将推动世界的有意义变化。