impugnation

简明释义

英[ɪmˈpjuːnəʃən]美[ɪmˈpjunˌeɪʃən]

n. 指摘；攻击（等于 impugnment）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The scientist faced impugnation from peers who doubted her results due to lack of reproducibility.

由于缺乏可重复性，这位科学家遭到了同行的质疑。

2.Her impugnation of the study's findings raised questions about the methodology used by the researchers.

她对研究结果的质疑引发了对研究者使用的方法论的质疑。

3.The lawyer's argument was met with an immediate impugnation, challenging the credibility of the evidence presented.

律师的论点立即遭到了质疑，挑战了所提供证据的可信度。

4.In politics, a candidate's past can often be subject to impugnation during election campaigns.

在政治中，候选人的过去常常在选举活动中受到攻击。

5.During the debate, his opponent made a strong impugnation of his character, attempting to undermine his reputation.

在辩论中，他的对手对他的品格进行了强烈的攻击，试图削弱他的声誉。

作文

In the realm of discourse, the act of impugnation is often a double-edged sword. It refers to the challenge or questioning of someone's integrity, motives, or actions. This term is particularly relevant in political debates, academic discussions, and even personal relationships where trust and credibility are paramount. When one party engages in impugnation, they are not merely expressing disagreement; they are casting doubt on the character and intentions of the other party. This can lead to a breakdown in communication and foster an environment of hostility rather than constructive dialogue.For instance, consider a political debate where one candidate attempts to discredit their opponent by highlighting past mistakes or alleged unethical behavior. This act of impugnation serves to undermine the opponent's credibility, making it difficult for them to effectively communicate their policies and vision. The audience may begin to question the integrity of the impugned candidate, which can shift public perception and influence voting behavior.Similarly, in academic settings, scholars may engage in impugnation when critiquing each other's research. While healthy skepticism is essential for intellectual growth, excessive or unfounded impugnation can stifle innovation and discourage collaboration. Researchers must be cautious not to let personal biases cloud their judgment, as this can lead to a toxic environment where ideas are not freely exchanged.On a personal level, impugnation can damage relationships. When friends or family members question each other's motives or integrity, it creates an atmosphere of distrust. For example, if one friend accuses another of only being supportive for selfish reasons, this act of impugnation can lead to resentment and conflict. In such cases, it is vital to address concerns openly and honestly, rather than resorting to accusations that may not be grounded in reality.However, it is important to recognize that impugnation is not inherently negative. In some contexts, challenging someone's actions or beliefs can lead to accountability and growth. For example, whistleblowers often face impugnation when they expose wrongdoing within an organization. While they may be criticized for their actions, their willingness to speak out can ultimately lead to positive change and greater transparency.In conclusion, the concept of impugnation plays a significant role in various aspects of life, from politics to personal relationships. While it can serve as a tool for accountability, it also has the potential to create division and mistrust. It is crucial for individuals to approach impugnation with care, ensuring that their critiques are based on facts and constructive intentions rather than personal vendettas or unfounded assumptions. By fostering an environment of open communication and mutual respect, we can mitigate the negative effects of impugnation and promote healthier interactions in all areas of life.

在话语的领域中，impugnation这一行为往往是一把双刃剑。它指的是对某人诚信、动机或行为的挑战或质疑。这个术语在政治辩论、学术讨论甚至个人关系中都特别相关，因为信任和信誉至关重要。当一方进行impugnation时，他们不仅仅是在表达不同意见；他们是在对另一方的品格和意图提出质疑。这可能导致沟通的破裂，并培养出敌对的环境，而不是建设性的对话。例如，考虑一个政治辩论，其中一位候选人试图通过强调过去的错误或所谓的不道德行为来诋毁对手。这种impugnation的行为旨在削弱对手的信誉，使他们难以有效地传达自己的政策和愿景。观众可能开始质疑被攻击候选人的诚信，这可能改变公众的看法并影响投票行为。同样，在学术环境中，学者们在批评彼此的研究时可能会进行impugnation。虽然健康的怀疑对智力成长至关重要，但过度或毫无根据的impugnation可能会抑制创新并阻碍合作。研究人员必须谨慎，避免让个人偏见影响他们的判断，因为这可能导致一个毒性的环境，在这个环境中，思想无法自由交流。在个人层面上，impugnation可能会损害关系。当朋友或家庭成员质疑彼此的动机或诚信时，会造成不信任的氛围。例如，如果一个朋友指责另一个朋友只是出于自私的原因而支持他们，这种impugnation的行为可能会导致怨恨和冲突。在这种情况下，开放和诚实地解决问题至关重要，而不是诉诸于可能没有现实依据的指控。然而，重要的是要认识到，impugnation并非固有消极。在某些背景下，挑战某人的行为或信念可以导致问责和成长。例如，当揭发者曝光组织内的不当行为时，他们常常面临impugnation。虽然他们可能因自己的行为受到批评，但他们愿意发声最终可以导致积极的变化和更大的透明度。总之，impugnation这一概念在生活的各个方面扮演着重要角色，从政治到个人关系。虽然它可以作为问责的工具，但也有可能造成分裂和不信任。个人在处理impugnation时必须谨慎，确保他们的批评是基于事实和建设性的意图，而不是个人恩怨或毫无根据的假设。通过营造开放沟通和相互尊重的环境，我们可以减轻impugnation的负面影响，并促进生活各个领域的更健康互动。