restrictiveness

简明释义

英[rɪˈstrɪktɪvnəs]美[rɪˈstrɪktɪvnəs]

限制性，约束性（restrictive 的名词形式）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Students are the subject in education process, and their subject consciousness is manifested in independency, activity, creativity and restrictiveness.

学生是教育过程的主体。学生的主体性表现为自主性、能动性、创造性和受制性。

2.The restrictiveness of headed relatives is determined by contrastive stress, and the definiteness of 'bare de' constructions is decided by the tense.

一般关系从句的限制性主要由对比重音决定，光杆“的”关系结构的确定性则主要由时态决定。

3.However, due to the restrictiveness of the compiled technique, it has not been able to push through in commercial products.

然而，由于已编译的技术的限制程度，它并没有能够在商业产品中通过推。

4.Students are the subject in education process, and their subject consciousness is manifested in independency, activity, creativity and restrictiveness.

学生是教育过程的主体。学生的主体性表现为自主性、能动性、创造性和受制性。

5.Many parents feel that the restrictiveness 限制性 of school rules is necessary for maintaining discipline.

许多家长认为学校规则的限制性 restrictiveness对于维护纪律是必要的。

6.The government is debating the level of restrictiveness 限制性 in the new policy regarding internet censorship.

政府正在讨论关于新互联网审查政策的限制性 restrictiveness程度。

7.The restrictiveness 限制性 of the new immigration laws has sparked protests across the country.

新移民法的限制性 restrictiveness引发了全国范围内的抗议。

8.In a democratic society, excessive restrictiveness 限制性 can lead to public discontent.

在民主社会中，过度的限制性 restrictiveness可能导致公众不满。

9.Some argue that the restrictiveness 限制性 of corporate policies stifles creativity and innovation.

一些人认为企业政策的限制性 restrictiveness扼杀了创造力和创新。

作文

In recent years, the concept of restrictiveness has gained significant attention in various fields, including education, law, and social policies. The term restrictiveness refers to the quality of being limited or controlled, which can have both positive and negative implications depending on the context in which it is applied. In this essay, I will explore the various dimensions of restrictiveness and its impact on society, particularly focusing on education and personal freedoms.Firstly, let us consider the role of restrictiveness in the educational system. Many argue that strict rules and regulations in schools are necessary to maintain order and discipline. For instance, a restrictive dress code may be implemented to minimize distractions and promote a focused learning environment. However, this restrictiveness can also lead to a stifling atmosphere where students feel unable to express their individuality. Critics argue that excessive restrictiveness in education can hinder creativity and critical thinking, essential skills for success in an increasingly complex world.Moreover, the restrictiveness of educational policies can disproportionately affect marginalized groups. For example, standardized testing, often seen as a fair measure of student ability, can be restrictive in nature, as it may not account for diverse learning styles and backgrounds. This can result in a cycle of disadvantage for students who do not perform well on such tests, limiting their access to higher education and future opportunities.On the other hand, some level of restrictiveness is necessary to ensure that all students receive a quality education. Regulations that set minimum standards for teachers and curricula can help safeguard against educational inequities. Therefore, it is crucial to strike a balance between necessary restrictiveness and the freedom to innovate and adapt teaching methods to meet the needs of all learners.In addition to education, restrictiveness plays a significant role in the realm of personal freedoms and civil liberties. Governments often impose laws and regulations intended to protect citizens, but these can sometimes become overly restrictive. For instance, measures aimed at enhancing national security can infringe upon individual rights, leading to debates about the appropriate level of restrictiveness in a democratic society. The challenge lies in finding a balance that protects public safety while preserving the fundamental freedoms that are essential to a thriving democracy.Furthermore, the restrictiveness of social policies can influence the well-being of individuals and communities. Policies that limit access to healthcare, housing, or employment opportunities can perpetuate cycles of poverty and inequality. Advocates for social justice argue that reducing restrictiveness in these areas is vital for creating a more equitable society. By removing barriers and providing support, individuals can achieve greater stability and empowerment.In conclusion, the concept of restrictiveness is multifaceted, encompassing both beneficial and detrimental aspects. While some degree of restrictiveness is necessary to maintain order and protect rights, it is essential to remain vigilant against excessive limitations that can stifle creativity, individuality, and social equity. As we navigate the complexities of modern society, it is imperative to critically assess the restrictiveness inherent in our systems and strive for a balance that fosters both security and freedom. Ultimately, understanding the implications of restrictiveness will enable us to advocate for policies and practices that promote a more inclusive and just society.

近年来，‘restrictiveness’这一概念在教育、法律和社会政策等多个领域引起了广泛关注。‘restrictiveness’一词指的是有限或受控的特性，这在不同的上下文中可能具有积极或消极的影响。在这篇文章中，我将探讨‘restrictiveness’的各个维度及其对社会的影响，特别关注教育和个人自由。首先，让我们考虑‘restrictiveness’在教育系统中的作用。许多人认为，学校中的严格规则和规定对于维护秩序和纪律是必要的。例如，实施严格的着装规范可以减少干扰，促进专注的学习环境。然而，这种‘restrictiveness’也可能导致一种压抑的氛围，学生感到无法表达自己的个性。批评者认为，过度的‘restrictiveness’会阻碍创造力和批判性思维，而这些都是在日益复杂的世界中取得成功的关键技能。此外，教育政策的‘restrictiveness’可能会对边缘化群体产生不成比例的影响。例如，标准化测试常被视为衡量学生能力的公平标准，但其本质上可能是‘restrictive’的，因为它可能未能考虑多样的学习风格和背景。这可能导致那些在此类测试中表现不佳的学生处于不利地位，从而限制他们进入高等教育和未来机会的机会。另一方面，某种程度的‘restrictiveness’对于确保所有学生接受优质教育是必要的。设定教师和课程最低标准的法规可以帮助防止教育不平等。因此，至关重要的是在必要的‘restrictiveness’与创新和适应教学方法以满足所有学习者需求之间找到平衡。除了教育之外，‘restrictiveness’在个人自由和公民权利领域也发挥着重要作用。政府通常会实施旨在保护公民的法律和法规，但这些有时可能变得过于‘restrictive’。例如，旨在增强国家安全的措施可能会侵犯个人权利，引发关于民主社会中适当的‘restrictiveness’水平的辩论。挑战在于找到一种平衡，既能保护公共安全，又能维护繁荣民主所必需的基本自由。此外，社会政策的‘restrictiveness’可能会影响个人和社区的福祉。限制医疗保健、住房或就业机会的政策可能会延续贫困和不平等的循环。社会正义倡导者认为，减少这些领域的‘restrictiveness’对于创建一个更公平的社会至关重要。通过消除障碍并提供支持，个人可以实现更大的稳定和赋权。总之，‘restrictiveness’的概念是多面的，包含了有益和有害的方面。虽然某种程度的‘restrictiveness’对于维护秩序和保护权利是必要的，但我们必须警惕过度的限制，这可能会扼杀创造力、个性和社会公平。随着我们在现代社会的复杂性中航行，批判性地评估我们系统中固有的‘restrictiveness’至关重要，并努力寻求促进安全与自由的平衡。最终，理解‘restrictiveness’的影响将使我们能够倡导促进更具包容性和公正的社会的政策和做法。