plebiscite

简明释义

英[ˈplebɪsaɪt;ˈplebɪsɪt]美[ˈplebɪsaɪt]

n. 公民投票；平民表决

复 数 p l e b i s c i t e s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1."It is evident that any attempt to conduct [the] plebiscite before achieving [an] acceptable settlement by the two parties will mean only returning to war," he said.

很明显，在双方达成可接受的方案之前试图进行公民投票，只能意味着战争再次爆发。

2.More than 1.7 million residents in south-east Queensland, from Tweed River to Toowoomba in the west, will vote in a plebiscite on March 17 on whether recycled water should be part of the water supply.

昆仕兰州东南部从缇德河到西边的图沃拔有超过170万居民，他们将于3月17日进行公民投票，决定是否应该把回收水作为部分水供。

3.If the Tories win the impending general election, he said, there will not be a plebiscite of any kind on Europe.

他表示，在本次大选中，如果保守党能当选，则该党不再就任何欧洲问题进行公投。

4.A plebiscite was held to decide the fate of the country.

举行了公民投票以决定国家的命运。

5.More than 1.7 million residents in south-east Queensland, from Tweed River to Toowoomba in the west, will vote in a plebiscite on March 17 on whether recycled water should be part of the water supply.

昆仕兰州东南部从缇德河到西边的图沃拔有超过170万居民，他们将于3月17日进行公民投票，决定是否应该把回收水作为部分水供。

6.Scottish parliamentary arithmetic means that Mr Salmond has little chance of winning approval even to hold a plebiscite.

苏格兰议会投票显示，萨尔蒙德想要举行公投恐怕很难。

7.The government decided to hold a plebiscite to determine the people's opinion on the new constitution.

政府决定举行一次公投以确定人民对新宪法的看法。

8.The results of the plebiscite showed overwhelming support for independence.

这次公投的结果显示出对独立的压倒性支持。

9.A plebiscite can be a powerful tool for direct democracy.

一个公投可以成为直接民主的有力工具。

10.Many citizens were excited to participate in the plebiscite on local governance reforms.

许多公民对参与地方治理改革的公投感到兴奋。

11.In 2016, the UK held a plebiscite on whether to remain in the European Union.

2016年，英国举行了一次关于是否留在欧盟的公投。

作文

In modern democracies, the concept of a plebiscite (公投) has become an essential tool for gauging public opinion on significant issues. A plebiscite is a direct vote in which an entire electorate is invited to vote on a particular proposal and can result in the adoption of a new law or policy. This mechanism empowers citizens by allowing them to have a say in decisions that affect their lives, thus enhancing the democratic process. Historically, plebiscites have been employed in various countries to resolve contentious issues, such as territorial disputes or constitutional changes. For instance, in 2014, Scotland held a plebiscite to determine whether it should become an independent country separate from the United Kingdom. The outcome, which saw a majority voting against independence, highlighted the importance of public sentiment in shaping national policies. The use of plebiscites can also be seen in other contexts, such as the Brexit referendum in 2016, where the British public was asked to vote on whether the UK should remain a member of the European Union. The decision to leave the EU was a significant turning point for the nation, illustrating how a plebiscite can lead to profound changes in governance and international relations. However, while plebiscites can enhance democratic engagement, they are not without their challenges. Critics argue that complex issues may be oversimplified into a binary choice, leading to outcomes that do not fully reflect the nuances of public opinion. Additionally, the potential for misinformation and emotional campaigning can skew results, raising questions about the validity of the outcomes. Moreover, the timing and context of a plebiscite can greatly influence its results. For example, economic downturns or social unrest can sway public opinion, resulting in decisions made under duress rather than rational deliberation. Therefore, it is crucial for governments to ensure that plebiscites are conducted fairly and transparently, with adequate information provided to voters. In conclusion, a plebiscite (公投) serves as a powerful tool for direct democracy, allowing citizens to voice their opinions on critical issues. While it offers a platform for public engagement and decision-making, it also poses challenges that must be carefully managed. As societies continue to evolve, the role of plebiscites will likely remain a topic of debate, reflecting the ongoing struggle to balance effective governance with the principles of democratic participation.