arbitrational

简明释义

英[/ˌɑːbɪˈtreɪʃənl/]美[/ˌɑːrbɪˈtreɪʃənl/]

adj. 关于仲裁的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Lawyer Jin has handled over 600 non-litigious, litigious and arbitrational cases, and gained extensive hands-on experience.

金律师办理过大量的非诉讼及诉讼、仲裁案件，办理案件数量已达600余件，积累了非常丰富的办案经验。

2.Lawyer Jin has handled over 600 non-litigious, litigious and arbitrational cases, and gained extensive hands-on experience.

金律师办理过大量的非诉讼及诉讼、仲裁案件，办理案件数量已达600余件，积累了非常丰富的办案经验。

3.The company agreed to an arbitrational 仲裁的 process to resolve the dispute with its supplier.

公司同意通过一个arbitrational 仲裁的程序来解决与供应商的争端。

4.The arbitrational 仲裁的 agreement was signed by both parties before the negotiations began.

在谈判开始之前，双方签署了arbitrational 仲裁的协议。

5.The arbitrational 仲裁的 panel consisted of experts in the field relevant to the dispute.

该arbitrational 仲裁的小组由与争议相关领域的专家组成。

6.In cases of conflict, the parties often turn to arbitrational 仲裁的 methods to avoid lengthy litigation.

在冲突的情况下，各方通常会转向arbitrational 仲裁的方法以避免漫长的诉讼。

7.Many businesses prefer arbitrational 仲裁的 resolutions due to their efficiency and confidentiality.

许多企业更喜欢arbitrational 仲裁的解决方案，因为它们高效且保密。

作文

In the realm of conflict resolution, the term arbitrational plays a crucial role in defining how disputes are settled outside of traditional court systems. Arbitration is a process where an impartial third party, known as an arbitrator, is appointed to make decisions regarding a disagreement between two or more parties. The arbitrational process is often favored for its efficiency and confidentiality compared to litigation. Many businesses and individuals prefer arbitration because it allows them to resolve their issues without the public scrutiny that comes with court cases. The arbitrational approach is particularly beneficial in commercial disputes, where maintaining a good business relationship is essential. For instance, if two companies have a disagreement over a contract, they may choose to enter into an arbitrational agreement to settle their differences amicably. This method not only saves time but also minimizes costs associated with prolonged legal battles. Furthermore, the arbitrator's decision is usually binding, meaning that both parties are required to adhere to the outcome, which can lead to quicker resolutions.Another significant advantage of the arbitrational process is the expertise of the arbitrators. Unlike judges in a court of law, who may not have specialized knowledge about the specific industry in question, arbitrators can be selected based on their expertise in the relevant field. This ensures that the decision made is informed and relevant, which is particularly important in complex commercial disputes involving technical details. Moreover, the arbitrational process is generally less formal than court proceedings. This informality can lead to a more relaxed environment where parties feel more comfortable presenting their cases. The procedures can be tailored to fit the needs of the parties involved, allowing for a more personalized approach to dispute resolution. However, it is essential to recognize that the arbitrational process is not without its drawbacks. One common criticism is that it can lack the transparency of court proceedings. Since arbitration is usually private, there is less public oversight, which can sometimes lead to concerns about fairness and accountability. Additionally, the limited grounds for appeal in arbitration can be problematic if one party feels that the arbitrator made an unjust decision. In conclusion, the arbitrational process serves as a vital alternative to traditional litigation, offering numerous benefits such as efficiency, confidentiality, and expertise. While it does come with certain limitations, many parties find that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. As the world becomes increasingly interconnected, the importance of arbitrational methods in resolving disputes will likely continue to grow, providing a framework for peaceful and effective conflict resolution across various sectors.

在冲突解决的领域中，术语arbitrational在定义如何在传统法庭系统之外解决争端方面发挥着至关重要的作用。仲裁是一种程序，其中一名公正的第三方，即仲裁员，被指定来就两个或多个当事人之间的争议做出决定。与诉讼相比，arbitrational过程因其高效性和保密性而受到青睐。许多企业和个人更喜欢仲裁，因为它使他们能够在没有法院案件带来的公众审查的情况下解决问题。arbitrational方法在商业争议中特别有益，因为维护良好的商业关系至关重要。例如，如果两家公司在合同上存在分歧，它们可能会选择签署一份arbitrational协议，以友好地解决分歧。这种方法不仅节省时间，还能减少与漫长法律斗争相关的费用。此外，仲裁员的决定通常是具有约束力的，这意味着双方都必须遵守结果，从而可以更快地达成解决方案。arbitrational过程的另一个显著优势是仲裁员的专业知识。与法庭上的法官不同，法官可能对特定行业没有专业知识，仲裁员可以根据其在相关领域的专业知识进行选择。这确保了所作出的决定是经过深思熟虑且相关的，这在涉及技术细节的复杂商业争议中尤为重要。此外，arbitrational过程通常比法庭程序更不正式。这种非正式性可以导致一个更轻松的环境，使各方在呈现案件时感到更舒适。程序可以根据涉及各方的需求进行定制，从而允许更个性化的争议解决方法。然而，必须认识到，arbitrational过程并非没有缺点。一种常见的批评是，它可能缺乏法庭程序的透明度。由于仲裁通常是私密的，因此公众监督较少，这有时会引发对公平性和问责制的担忧。此外，仲裁中有限的上诉理由可能会在一方感到仲裁员做出不公正的决定时造成问题。总之，arbitrational过程作为传统诉讼的重要替代方案，提供了诸多好处，例如高效性、保密性和专业知识。尽管它确实存在某些局限性，但许多当事方发现这些优势超过了劣势。随着世界日益互联，arbitrational方法在解决争端中的重要性可能会继续增长，为各个领域提供和平而有效的冲突解决框架。