lowest bidder

简明释义

最低价格投标人

英英释义

例句

1.In government contracts, the lowest bidder is often selected to ensure taxpayer money is spent wisely.

在政府合同中，通常选择最低投标人以确保纳税人的钱得到明智使用。

2.After reviewing all proposals, they chose the lowest bidder who met all the requirements.

在审查所有提案后，他们选择了满足所有要求的最低投标人。

3.The city council decided to go with the lowest bidder for the new park project.

市议会决定选择最低投标人进行新公园项目。

4.Sometimes, the lowest bidder may compromise on quality to reduce costs.

有时，最低投标人可能会为了降低成本而妥协质量。

5.The construction company awarded the contract to the lowest bidder because their proposal was the most cost-effective.

建筑公司将合同授予最低投标人，因为他们的提案是最具成本效益的。

作文

In today's competitive marketplace, the term lowest bidder (最低投标者) has become a common phrase in business transactions, especially in construction and procurement sectors. The concept of being the lowest bidder refers to the practice where companies or contractors submit their bids for projects, and the one that offers the lowest price is awarded the contract. While this may seem like a straightforward approach to securing contracts, it is essential to understand the implications and potential consequences of prioritizing the lowest bidder over other considerations.Firstly, choosing the lowest bidder can lead to significant cost savings for organizations. When budgets are tight, opting for the cheapest option may appear to be the most logical choice. For instance, a government agency looking to build a new bridge might select the lowest bidder to ensure that taxpayer money is spent wisely. However, this decision can sometimes backfire if the quality of work is compromised due to the low bid. In many cases, the lowest bidder may cut corners to reduce costs, which can result in subpar materials or rushed work that does not meet safety standards.Moreover, the emphasis on being the lowest bidder can create a race to the bottom among contractors. This phenomenon often leads to a decrease in the overall quality of services offered within the industry. Contractors may feel pressured to lower their prices to remain competitive, which can result in unsustainable business practices. Over time, this can erode trust between clients and contractors, as clients may begin to associate low bids with poor quality and unreliable service.Additionally, the focus on the lowest bidder can overlook the importance of value beyond just the price tag. Factors such as experience, reputation, and past performance should also play a critical role in the selection process. For example, a contractor with a higher bid but an excellent track record of completing projects on time and within budget may ultimately provide better value than a lowest bidder who has little experience or a history of delays. Therefore, it is crucial for organizations to evaluate bids holistically rather than solely focusing on cost.Furthermore, the lowest bidder approach can have long-term repercussions for the industry as a whole. When contractors consistently underbid to win contracts, it can lead to financial instability and even bankruptcy for some firms. This instability can create a lack of competition in the market, ultimately reducing options for clients and driving up prices in the long run. It is essential for organizations to recognize that while the lowest bidder may save money in the short term, the potential for future costs associated with poor quality work or project delays can negate those initial savings.In conclusion, while the allure of the lowest bidder is strong, it is vital for organizations to consider the broader implications of their choices. Balancing cost with quality, reliability, and long-term value should be the primary focus when awarding contracts. By moving beyond the simplistic notion of the lowest bidder, businesses can foster healthier relationships with contractors and ultimately achieve better outcomes for their projects. It is essential to remember that in the world of business, you often get what you pay for, and sometimes, the cheapest option is not the best choice.

在当今竞争激烈的市场中，短语最低投标者（lowest bidder）已成为商业交易中的常用术语，特别是在建筑和采购领域。作为最低投标者的概念是指公司或承包商提交他们的项目投标，出价最低的公司将获得合同。虽然这似乎是确保合同的简单方法，但理解优先考虑最低投标者而非其他考虑因素的影响和潜在后果是至关重要的。首先，选择最低投标者可以为组织带来显著的成本节约。当预算紧张时，选择最便宜的选项似乎是最合逻辑的选择。例如，一个政府机构希望建造一座新桥，可能会选择最低投标者以确保纳税人的钱得到明智的使用。然而，如果由于低投标而导致工作质量受到影响，这一决定有时会适得其反。在许多情况下，最低投标者可能会为了降低成本而偷工减料，从而导致次级材料或赶工的工作，未能符合安全标准。此外，强调成为最低投标者可能会在承包商之间造成一种恶性竞争。这种现象往往导致整个行业服务整体质量的下降。承包商可能感到压力，必须降低价格以保持竞争力，这可能导致不可持续的商业行为。随着时间的推移，这可能会侵蚀客户与承包商之间的信任，因为客户可能开始将低报价与低质量和不可靠的服务联系在一起。因此，组织在选择投标时，全面评估投标方案，而不仅仅关注价格是至关重要的。此外，最低投标者的方法可能会忽视超越价格标签的重要价值。经验、声誉和过去的表现等因素也应在选择过程中发挥关键作用。例如，一家报价较高但在按时和按预算完成项目方面有良好记录的承包商，最终可能提供比一个经验不足或有延误历史的最低投标者更好的价值。因此，组织必须全面评估投标，而不仅仅关注成本。此外，最低投标者的做法对整个行业可能产生长期影响。当承包商为了赢得合同而不断降低报价时，可能会导致一些公司的财务不稳定甚至破产。这种不稳定可能导致市场竞争的缺乏，最终减少客户的选择并在长期内推高价格。组织必须意识到，虽然选择最低投标者可能在短期内节省资金，但与低质量工作或项目延误相关的未来成本可能会抵消这些初步的节省。总之，尽管最低投标者的吸引力很强，但组织必须考虑其选择的更广泛影响。在授予合同时，平衡成本与质量、可靠性和长期价值应成为主要关注点。通过超越简单的最低投标者概念，企业可以与承包商建立更健康的关系，最终实现项目的更好结果。必须记住，在商业世界中，你通常得到的是你所支付的，有时，最便宜的选择并不是最佳选择。