savages
简明释义
n. 野蛮人(savage 的复数);残酷的人
v. 凶猛地攻击;激怒(savage 的三单形式)
英英释义
单词用法
野外的野蛮人 | |
残酷攻击 | |
严厉批评 | |
历史上的野蛮人 | |
野蛮的本性 | |
野性的美 |
同义词
反义词
文明的 | 文明世界有许多法律来保护人权。 | ||
优雅的 | 她在艺术和文学方面有着优雅的品味。 | ||
有文化的 | He is a cultured individual who appreciates various forms of art. | 他是一个有文化的人,欣赏各种艺术形式。 |
例句
1.That's an island inhabited by savages.
那是一个野蛮人居住的岛屿。
2.I wish they had just told us outright that we were savages and our world was stupid.
我真希望他们直接的告诉我们:“我们是野人,我们的世界是愚蠢的。”
3.Fees will be an even bigger worry this year as the subprime mess savages family finances.
次贷危机肆虐的当下,学费将成为家庭经济的重大难题。
4.What that amounts to appears to be something between the Lost Boys in Peter Pan and the young savages in Lord of the Flies.
他们的情况仿佛徘徊在《彼得潘》里的迷失男孩和《蝇王》里的残酷少年之间。
5.Inland there were savages and outlaws to avoid.
上岸深入内地,就得躲避野蛮人和亡命之徒。
6.There are mang humorous things in the world; among them the white man's notion that he is less savage than the other savages.
世界上有许多幽默可笑的事情,其中之一是白种人认为他比其他的野蛮人比较不野蛮。
7.The Mon Calamari developed culturally and technologically while the Quarren trailed behind as primitive savages.
蒙卡拉马里人的文化和技术较为发达,将原始未开化的夸润人抛在后面。
8.The savages darted spears at the lion .
那些野人向狮子投掷标枪。
9.The documentary shed light on the lives of savages who have resisted modern civilization.
这部纪录片揭示了那些抵制现代文明的野蛮人的生活。
10.In the novel, the protagonist is captured by savages and must find a way to escape.
在小说中,主角被野蛮人俘获,必须找到逃脱的方法。
11.The artist depicted the savages in his painting as noble and misunderstood.
艺术家在他的画作中将野蛮人描绘为高尚而被误解的形象。
12.Some people mistakenly believe that all savages are violent and dangerous.
有些人错误地认为所有的野蛮人都是暴力和危险的。
13.The explorers encountered a tribe of savages who lived deep in the jungle.
探险者遇到了一支生活在丛林深处的野蛮人部落。
作文
In the annals of history, the term savages (野蛮人) has often been used to describe groups of people who were perceived as uncivilized or barbaric by more advanced societies. This label has been a source of much debate and controversy, as it raises questions about cultural relativism and the ethics of labeling others. The use of the word savages (野蛮人) implies a judgment that is often rooted in ethnocentrism, where one culture views itself as superior to another. Throughout history, various civilizations have encountered what they deemed to be savages (野蛮人). For instance, European explorers in the 15th and 16th centuries often described indigenous peoples of the Americas, Africa, and Oceania as savages (野蛮人). This characterization served to justify colonization and the imposition of foreign values and systems on these populations. By labeling these groups as savages (野蛮人), colonizers could rationalize their actions, claiming they were bringing 'civilization' to those who supposedly lacked it.However, this perspective is deeply flawed. Cultures around the world have their own complexities, traditions, and social structures that are often overlooked when viewed through a narrow lens. The term savages (野蛮人) fails to recognize the rich histories and sophisticated societies that existed long before European contact. For example, the Aztec and Inca empires were highly organized and advanced in their own right, yet they were often dismissed as savages (野蛮人) by European standards. The consequences of using the term savages (野蛮人) extend beyond historical mischaracterizations; they also affect modern perceptions and relationships between cultures. In contemporary discourse, referring to any group as savages (野蛮人) can perpetuate stereotypes and reinforce divisions. It can lead to a lack of understanding and empathy, fueling conflicts and hindering cooperation between different cultural groups. Moreover, the concept of savages (野蛮人) can be applied to modern contexts, where certain behaviors or practices are deemed unacceptable by mainstream society. For instance, individuals or groups that engage in violent acts may be labeled as savages (野蛮人) in media narratives, which can dehumanize them and overlook the underlying issues that contribute to such behavior. This labeling can prevent a deeper understanding of the root causes of violence, such as poverty, inequality, and social injustice. In conclusion, the term savages (野蛮人) is laden with historical baggage and cultural implications that warrant careful consideration. While it may have been used to describe certain groups in the past, its application today is problematic and often harmful. As we strive for a more inclusive and understanding world, it is essential to move beyond simplistic labels and engage with the complexities of human societies. By doing so, we can foster greater empathy and collaboration across cultural divides, ultimately enriching our shared human experience.
在历史的记载中,术语savages(野蛮人)常常被用来描述那些被更先进社会视为未开化或野蛮的群体。这个标签引发了很多争论和争议,因为它提出了文化相对主义和标记他人伦理的问题。使用savages(野蛮人)这个词暗示了一种判断,这种判断通常根植于民族中心主义,即一种文化将自身视为优于另一种文化。在历史上,各种文明曾遇到他们所认为的savages(野蛮人)。例如,15世纪和16世纪的欧洲探险者常常将美洲、非洲和大洋洲的土著人民描述为savages(野蛮人)。这种表述为殖民和对这些群体施加外来价值观和制度提供了合理性。通过将这些群体标记为savages(野蛮人),殖民者可以合理化他们的行为,声称他们是在将“文明”带给那些显然缺乏文明的人。然而,这种观点是深深有缺陷的。世界各地的文化都有其自身的复杂性、传统和社会结构,这在狭隘的视角下往往被忽视。术语savages(野蛮人)未能认识到在欧洲接触之前就已经存在的丰富历史和复杂社会。例如,阿兹特克和印加帝国在自身的权利上都是高度组织和先进的,但它们常常被欧洲标准视为savages(野蛮人)。使用术语savages(野蛮人)的后果不仅限于历史上的误解;它们还影响现代文化之间的看法和关系。在当代话语中,称任何群体为savages(野蛮人)可能会延续刻板印象并强化分裂。这可能导致缺乏理解和同情,加剧冲突,阻碍不同文化群体之间的合作。此外,savages(野蛮人)的概念也可以应用于现代背景,其中某些行为或做法被主流社会视为不可接受。例如,参与暴力行为的个人或群体可能在媒体叙事中被标记为savages(野蛮人),这可能使他们非人化,并忽视导致这种行为的根本问题。这种标签可能阻止我们深入理解暴力的根源,如贫困、不平等和社会不公。总之,术语savages(野蛮人)承载着历史包袱和文化含义,需要仔细考虑。虽然它可能曾用于描述过去的某些群体,但今天的应用是有问题的,往往是有害的。随着我们努力追求一个更加包容和理解的世界,超越简单的标签,与人类社会的复杂性进行互动至关重要。通过这样做,我们可以在文化鸿沟之间培养更大的同情心和合作,最终丰富我们共同的人类经验。