quasi-general average

简明释义

准共同海损

英英释义

例句

1.Understanding quasi-general average 准一般平均损失 is essential for ship owners to manage their financial risks effectively.

理解quasi-general average 准一般平均损失对于船主有效管理财务风险至关重要。

2.During the shipping process, we encountered a situation that required us to invoke quasi-general average 准一般平均损失 to cover unexpected expenses.

在运输过程中，我们遇到了需要调用quasi-general average 准一般平均损失来覆盖意外费用的情况。

3.The insurance policy included a clause for quasi-general average 准一般平均损失, ensuring that all parties shared the costs of damage equally.

保险政策中包括了quasi-general average 准一般平均损失的条款，确保所有各方平等分担损失费用。

4.In maritime law, the concept of quasi-general average 准一般平均损失 can be applied when cargo is sacrificed for the safety of the ship.

在海洋法中，当货物为了船只的安全而被牺牲时，可以应用quasi-general average 准一般平均损失的概念。

5.The court ruled that the damages incurred were eligible for quasi-general average 准一般平均损失 compensation due to the emergency conditions.

法院裁定，由于紧急情况，所产生的损害有资格获得quasi-general average 准一般平均损失赔偿。

作文

In the world of maritime law and shipping, terms can often be complex and nuanced. One such term that has gained recognition is quasi-general average. This concept represents a unique approach to cost-sharing in maritime incidents. To fully understand the implications of quasi-general average, it is essential to first grasp the fundamental principles of general average itself. General average is a principle in maritime law where all parties involved in a maritime venture share the losses resulting from a voluntary sacrifice of part of the ship or cargo to save the whole. For instance, if a ship encounters a storm and must jettison some cargo to prevent sinking, the loss is shared among all stakeholders. However, this principle applies strictly to instances where the loss is deemed necessary for the common good of all parties involved.The quasi-general average extends this concept slightly, allowing for more flexibility in how costs are allocated among parties. It recognizes that not all sacrifices made during a maritime incident are equal or necessary in the traditional sense of general average. In some cases, certain actions might be taken to mitigate losses that do not meet the stringent requirements of a general average claim but still warrant some form of compensation or cost-sharing among the parties involved.For example, consider a scenario where a ship must divert from its course to avoid a collision. Although this decision may not involve the jettisoning of cargo, it could still incur significant costs, such as additional fuel expenses or delays. In such cases, the quasi-general average can come into play, allowing for an equitable distribution of these unexpected costs among the affected parties.Understanding quasi-general average is crucial for shipowners, insurers, and other stakeholders in the maritime industry. It provides a framework for addressing situations where the traditional general average principles may not apply, yet there is still a need for fairness in cost allocation. By acknowledging the nuances of each situation, the quasi-general average helps to ensure that no single party bears an undue burden in the face of unforeseen challenges.Moreover, the application of quasi-general average can lead to more amicable resolutions in disputes over cost-sharing. When all parties recognize that certain sacrifices, while not meeting the strict criteria of general average, still merit consideration, it fosters cooperation and understanding. This is particularly important in an industry that relies heavily on collaboration among various stakeholders, including shipowners, cargo owners, and insurers.In conclusion, the concept of quasi-general average enriches the discourse surrounding maritime law by providing a more flexible approach to cost-sharing during maritime incidents. As the shipping industry continues to evolve and face new challenges, understanding and applying this principle will become increasingly vital. Stakeholders must remain informed about the implications of quasi-general average to navigate the complexities of maritime operations effectively and equitably. Ultimately, this understanding contributes to a more resilient and fair maritime industry, where the burdens of unforeseen events are shared justly among all involved.

在海事法和航运的世界中，术语往往复杂且微妙。其中一个逐渐受到认可的术语是准一般平均。这个概念代表了一种独特的成本分担方法，用于海事事件。要完全理解准一般平均的含义，首先需要掌握一般平均的基本原则。一般平均是海事法中的一项原则，在这种情况下，参与海事冒险的所有各方共同承担由于自愿牺牲部分船舶或货物而导致的损失，以拯救整体。例如，如果一艘船遇到风暴并必须抛弃一些货物以防止沉没，则损失将在所有利益相关者之间共享。然而，这一原则严格适用于那些被认为对所有参与方的共同利益是必要的损失。准一般平均稍微扩展了这一概念，允许在各方之间更灵活地分配成本。它承认，并非在海事事件中所做的所有牺牲都在传统一般平均的严格意义上是平等或必要的。在某些情况下，可能会采取某些行动来减轻损失，这些行动虽然不符合一般平均索赔的严格要求，但仍值得在参与方之间进行某种形式的补偿或成本分担。例如，考虑一种情况，一艘船必须改变航向以避免碰撞。尽管这一决定可能不涉及抛弃货物，但仍可能产生显著的成本，例如额外的燃料费用或延误。在这种情况下，准一般平均可以发挥作用，允许在受影响的各方之间公平分配这些意外成本。了解准一般平均对船东、保险公司和海事行业的其他利益相关者至关重要。它为处理传统一般平均原则可能不适用的情况提供了框架，同时仍然需要公平的成本分配。通过承认每种情况的细微差别，准一般平均有助于确保在面对不可预见的挑战时，没有一方承担过重的负担。此外，准一般平均的应用可以在关于成本分担的争议中导致更友好的解决方案。当所有各方认识到某些牺牲虽然不符合一般平均的严格标准，但仍值得考虑时，这促进了合作与理解。这在一个严重依赖各方合作的行业中尤为重要，包括船东、货主和保险公司。总之，准一般平均的概念通过提供一种更灵活的海事事件成本分担方法，丰富了有关海事法的讨论。随着航运业的不断发展和面临新挑战，理解和应用这一原则将变得越来越重要。利益相关者必须保持对准一般平均含义的了解，以有效和公正地应对海事操作的复杂性。最终，这种理解有助于建立一个更具韧性和公平的海事行业，在不可预见事件的负担在所有参与者之间得到公正分享。