monopoly trade

简明释义

专卖业

英英释义

例句

1.Regulators are working to prevent monopoly trade 垄断贸易 by enforcing antitrust laws.

监管机构正在通过执行反垄断法来防止monopoly trade垄断贸易。

2.Many economists argue that monopoly trade 垄断贸易 stifles innovation and reduces consumer choice.

许多经济学家认为monopoly trade垄断贸易抑制了创新并减少了消费者选择。

3.The government is investigating the company for its alleged involvement in monopoly trade 垄断贸易 practices that harm competition.

政府正在调查该公司因其涉嫌参与monopoly trade垄断贸易行为而损害竞争。

4.In a monopoly trade 垄断贸易 situation, consumers often face higher prices due to lack of alternatives.

在monopoly trade垄断贸易的情况下，由于缺乏替代品，消费者通常面临更高的价格。

5.The rise of technology companies has led to concerns about monopoly trade 垄断贸易 in the digital marketplace.

科技公司的崛起引发了对数字市场中monopoly trade垄断贸易的担忧。

作文

The concept of monopoly trade has been a significant topic of discussion in economics and business for many years. A monopoly trade occurs when a single company or entity dominates the market for a particular product or service, effectively eliminating competition. This dominance can lead to various consequences, both positive and negative, for consumers and the economy as a whole.One of the most notable characteristics of monopoly trade is the ability of the monopolist to set prices without regard to competition. In a competitive market, prices are determined by supply and demand dynamics. However, when a single firm controls the entire supply of a product, it can dictate the price, often leading to higher costs for consumers. For instance, if a pharmaceutical company holds a patent on a life-saving drug, it can charge exorbitant prices due to its exclusive rights to sell that medication. While this can result in substantial profits for the company, it raises ethical concerns regarding access to essential goods and services.On the other hand, proponents of monopoly trade argue that monopolies can foster innovation and efficiency. With a secure market position, a monopolistic company might have more resources to invest in research and development, leading to advancements that benefit society. For example, technology giants like Apple and Google have been criticized for their market dominance, yet they have also produced groundbreaking products that have transformed our daily lives. The argument here is that the financial stability provided by monopoly trade can encourage companies to take risks and innovate in ways that smaller competitors might not be able to afford.However, the risks associated with monopoly trade cannot be overlooked. When competition is stifled, there is less incentive for companies to improve their products or services. Consumers may find themselves with fewer choices, and the quality of goods may decline over time. Moreover, monopolistic practices can lead to economic inequality, as wealth becomes concentrated in the hands of a few powerful entities. This concentration can also lead to political influence, where monopolies lobby for favorable regulations that further entrench their market position, creating a vicious cycle that is difficult to break.Regulatory bodies play a crucial role in managing monopoly trade. Governments often implement antitrust laws designed to prevent monopolies from forming or to dismantle existing monopolies that harm consumer welfare. These laws aim to promote competition, ensuring that markets remain dynamic and responsive to consumer needs. The effectiveness of these regulations can vary significantly between countries, depending on the political climate and economic philosophies at play.In conclusion, monopoly trade is a complex phenomenon with both advantages and disadvantages. While it can lead to innovation and efficiency, it also poses significant risks to consumer choice and economic equity. As we navigate an increasingly interconnected global economy, understanding the implications of monopoly trade is essential for policymakers, businesses, and consumers alike. Striking a balance between fostering innovation and maintaining healthy competition will be crucial for sustainable economic growth in the future.

“垄断贸易”的概念在经济学和商业领域已经成为一个重要的话题。“垄断贸易”发生在一个公司或实体主导某一特定产品或服务的市场时，有效消除了竞争。这种主导地位可能对消费者和整个经济产生各种积极和消极的影响。“垄断贸易”的一个显著特征是垄断者能够在没有竞争的情况下设定价格。在竞争市场中，价格由供需动态决定。然而，当一家企业控制了某一产品的全部供应时，它可以决定价格，往往导致消费者成本上升。例如，如果一家制药公司拥有一种救命药物的专利，它可以因为其独占销售该药物的权利而收取高价。虽然这可能为公司带来可观的利润，但它引发了关于获取基本商品和服务的伦理问题。另一方面，“垄断贸易”的支持者认为，垄断可以促进创新和效率。由于市场地位的安全，垄断公司可能有更多资源投入研发，从而带来使社会受益的进步。例如，像苹果和谷歌这样的科技巨头因其市场主导地位而受到批评，但它们也生产了改变我们日常生活的突破性产品。这里的论点是，“垄断贸易”所提供的财务稳定可以鼓励公司承担风险并以小型竞争对手可能无法承受的方式进行创新。然而，与“垄断贸易”相关的风险不容忽视。当竞争受到压制时，公司改善其产品或服务的动力就会减少。消费者可能会发现选择更少，商品质量可能随着时间的推移而下降。此外，垄断行为可能导致经济不平等，因为财富集中在少数强大实体手中。这种集中还可能导致政治影响力，垄断企业游说以获得有利的法规，从而进一步巩固其市场地位，形成难以打破的恶性循环。监管机构在管理“垄断贸易”方面发挥着至关重要的作用。各国政府通常会实施反垄断法，旨在防止垄断的形成或拆解那些损害消费者福利的现有垄断。这些法律旨在促进竞争，确保市场保持活力并响应消费者需求。这些法规的有效性在不同国家之间可能会有显著差异，具体取决于政治气候和经济理念。总之，“垄断贸易”是一个复杂的现象，既有优点也有缺点。虽然它可以导致创新和效率，但也对消费者选择和经济公平构成重大风险。随着我们在日益相互关联的全球经济中航行，理解“垄断贸易”的影响对政策制定者、企业和消费者来说都是至关重要的。在促进创新与维护健康竞争之间找到平衡，对于未来可持续经济增长至关重要。