extra-budgetary funds

简明释义

预算外经费，预算外资金

英英释义

例句

1.The city council discussed how to best allocate the extra-budgetary funds for community development.

市议会讨论如何最好地分配超预算资金以促进社区发展。

2.The government allocated a portion of the extra-budgetary funds to improve infrastructure in rural areas.

政府将一部分超预算资金分配用于改善农村基础设施。

3.Many non-profit organizations rely on extra-budgetary funds to support their community projects.

许多非营利组织依靠超预算资金来支持他们的社区项目。

4.The school was able to purchase new technology thanks to extra-budgetary funds from the local government.

由于当地政府提供的超预算资金，学校能够购买新技术。

5.They used the extra-budgetary funds to launch a new public health initiative.

他们利用超预算资金启动了一项新的公共卫生倡议。

作文

In the realm of public finance, the term extra-budgetary funds refers to financial resources that are generated outside the regular budgetary processes of a government or organization. These funds can originate from various sources, including grants, donations, and specific revenue-generating activities. Understanding the concept of extra-budgetary funds is crucial for comprehending how governments and institutions manage their finances and allocate resources effectively.One of the primary advantages of extra-budgetary funds is that they provide additional financial flexibility. Governments often face constraints within their annual budgets, which are determined through a lengthy planning and approval process. By having access to extra-budgetary funds, they can respond more swiftly to emerging needs or unforeseen circumstances. For example, during a natural disaster, a government may utilize extra-budgetary funds to mobilize emergency services and provide immediate relief to affected communities without waiting for a formal budget revision.Moreover, extra-budgetary funds can enhance the ability of public institutions to pursue specialized projects that may not receive adequate funding through traditional budget channels. For instance, educational institutions might establish research grants funded by private donors or partnerships with corporations. These funds allow them to innovate and expand their programs beyond what is possible under the constraints of their standard budget.However, the use of extra-budgetary funds also comes with challenges and potential risks. One significant concern is the lack of transparency and accountability associated with these funds. Since they are not part of the official budget, it can be difficult for stakeholders to track how the money is being spent or to ensure that it aligns with the broader goals of the organization or government. This can lead to mismanagement or misuse of funds, undermining public trust.Another issue is the potential for extra-budgetary funds to create dependency on external sources of financing. If organizations become reliant on these funds, they may neglect their core budgetary responsibilities, leading to sustainability issues in the long run. For example, if a health department primarily relies on extra-budgetary funds for critical programs, any reduction in those funds could jeopardize public health initiatives.To mitigate these risks, it is essential for governments and organizations to implement robust oversight mechanisms for extra-budgetary funds. This includes establishing clear guidelines for how these funds can be generated and utilized, as well as regular audits to ensure compliance and transparency. Engaging stakeholders in the budgeting process can also help foster a sense of accountability and encourage responsible management of all financial resources.In conclusion, extra-budgetary funds play a vital role in enhancing the financial capacity of governments and organizations. They offer opportunities for innovation and rapid response to urgent needs, but they also pose challenges that must be addressed. By ensuring transparency, accountability, and responsible management practices, authorities can harness the benefits of extra-budgetary funds while minimizing the associated risks. Ultimately, a balanced approach to funding will contribute to more effective governance and better outcomes for communities around the world.

在公共财政领域，术语extra-budgetary funds指的是在政府或组织的常规预算流程之外产生的财务资源。这些资金可以来自各种来源，包括赠款、捐款和特定的收入生成活动。理解extra-budgetary funds的概念对于理解政府和机构如何有效管理财务和分配资源至关重要。extra-budgetary funds的主要优点之一是它们提供了额外的财务灵活性。政府通常面临年度预算中的限制，这些预算通过漫长的规划和审批过程确定。通过获得extra-budgetary funds，他们可以更迅速地应对新出现的需求或不可预见的情况。例如，在自然灾害期间，政府可以利用extra-budgetary funds动员紧急服务并向受影响社区提供即时救助，而无需等待正式的预算修订。此外，extra-budgetary funds可以增强公共机构追求专项项目的能力，这些项目可能在传统预算渠道下得不到足够的资金支持。例如，教育机构可能会通过私人捐助者或与企业的合作建立研究资助。这些资金使他们能够创新并扩展其项目，超越标准预算的限制。然而，使用extra-budgetary funds也伴随着挑战和潜在风险。一个重大问题是与这些资金相关的缺乏透明度和问责制。由于它们不属于官方预算，因此利益相关者可能很难追踪资金的支出方式，或者确保其与组织或政府的更广泛目标保持一致。这可能导致资金的管理不善或滥用，从而破坏公众信任。另一个问题是extra-budgetary funds可能导致对外部融资来源的依赖。如果组织过于依赖这些资金，他们可能会忽视核心预算责任，从而在长期内导致可持续性问题。例如，如果一个卫生部门主要依赖extra-budgetary funds来支持关键项目，那么这些资金的任何减少都可能危及公共卫生倡议。为了减轻这些风险，政府和组织必须为extra-budgetary funds实施强有力的监督机制。这包括建立明确的指南，规定这些资金如何生成和使用，以及定期审计以确保合规性和透明度。让利益相关者参与预算过程也有助于促进问责感，并鼓励对所有财务资源的负责任管理。总之，extra-budgetary funds在增强政府和组织的财务能力方面发挥着重要作用。它们为创新和快速响应紧急需求提供了机会，但也带来了必须解决的挑战。通过确保透明度、问责制和负责任的管理实践，当局可以利用extra-budgetary funds的好处，同时最小化相关风险。最终，平衡的资金方法将有助于更有效的治理，并为全球社区带来更好的结果。