personhood

简明释义

英[ˈpɜːs(ə)nhʊd]美[ˈpɜːrsənˌhʊd]

n. 做人；人格；个性

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Is there such a form for personhood?

对于个人品质来说也有这样一种外形吗？

2.We pursue "ecru personhood, outstanding work" enterprise culture.

我司追求“本色做人，出色做事”的企业文化。

3.They talk of whales and dolphins in terms of cultures and societies, and say cetaceans possess qualities of personhood.

他们用文化和社会术语来谈论鲸鱼和海豚，称鲸目动物拥有人格性品质。

4.This suggests that it may not enough to simply be a person, but that part of personhood consists of trying to be a "decent" or "good" person.

这标明，它不能够足够的仅仅是一团体；但是，做人的一局部由努力成为一个“正派”或“好”的人。

5.Take pride in your personhood and the progress that you have made, but never become so content that you cannot find room for improvement.

为你的人格和你走到今天的过程感到自豪，但永远都不要太自得以为不需要再提高了。

6.Mississippi's voters prepare to decide when personhood begins.

密西西比州的投票将决定人生从何时起。

7.Legal discussions about personhood (人格资格) can impact rights and protections for different beings.

关于人格资格的法律讨论可能会影响不同生物的权利和保护。

8.In her speech, she emphasized the importance of recognizing personhood (人格资格) in all human beings.

在她的演讲中，她强调了承认所有人类的人格资格的重要性。

9.The debate over abortion often centers on the question of when a fetus achieves personhood (人格资格).

关于堕胎的辩论常常围绕着一个问题展开：胎儿何时获得人格资格。

10.Many philosophers argue that animals should be granted some form of personhood (人格资格) based on their capacity to feel pain.

许多哲学家认为，动物应该根据其感知痛苦的能力被赋予某种形式的人格资格。

11.Some cultures have unique perspectives on personhood (人格资格) that differ from Western views.

一些文化对人格资格的看法与西方观点有所不同。

作文

The concept of personhood has been a significant topic of discussion in philosophy, law, and ethics. It refers to the quality or condition of being an individual person, especially in terms of rights and responsibilities. Understanding personhood is crucial as it influences how we perceive human dignity, moral consideration, and legal status. In modern society, the definition of personhood is often debated and can vary significantly across different cultures and legal systems.Historically, the notion of personhood has evolved. Ancient philosophers, such as Aristotle, viewed a person as a rational being capable of making choices. This perspective laid the groundwork for contemporary discussions on what it means to be a person. In contrast, modern debates often include considerations of consciousness, self-awareness, and the capacity for relationships. For example, many argue that infants, mentally disabled individuals, and even certain animals possess personhood due to their ability to experience pain and emotions.In legal contexts, personhood becomes even more complex. The recognition of personhood grants individuals specific rights, such as the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. However, there are ongoing debates about when personhood begins. Some argue that it starts at conception, while others believe it begins at birth or at some point during fetal development. These differing views have significant implications for issues like abortion and reproductive rights.Furthermore, the question of personhood extends beyond humans. In recent years, there have been discussions about granting personhood to non-human entities, such as corporations or advanced artificial intelligence. Proponents argue that these entities should have rights and responsibilities similar to those of individuals. Critics, however, warn that expanding personhood in this way could dilute the meaning of being a person and undermine human rights.The implications of personhood are profound and far-reaching. It shapes our ethical frameworks and informs our laws. For instance, if we recognize certain animals as possessing personhood, we may be compelled to change our treatment of them, leading to stricter animal welfare laws. Similarly, redefining personhood in legal contexts could affect how we approach issues like immigration, healthcare, and social justice.In conclusion, personhood is a multifaceted concept that plays a critical role in shaping our understanding of identity, rights, and moral obligations. As society continues to evolve, so too will our interpretations of personhood. Engaging in these discussions is essential, as they not only reflect our values but also influence the future trajectory of human rights and ethical considerations in a rapidly changing world.

‘人格’的概念在哲学、法律和伦理学中一直是一个重要的讨论主题。它指的是作为一个个体的质量或状态，特别是在权利和责任方面。理解‘人格’至关重要，因为它影响我们对人类尊严、道德考虑和法律地位的看法。在现代社会中，‘人格’的定义常常被辩论，并且在不同文化和法律体系中可能存在显著差异。历史上，‘人格’的概念不断演变。古代哲学家如亚里士多德认为，人是能够做出选择的理性存在。这一观点为当代关于成为一个人意味着什么的讨论奠定了基础。相反，现代辩论通常包括意识、自我意识和关系能力的考量。例如，许多人认为婴儿、智力残疾人士甚至某些动物由于能够体验痛苦和情感而具有人格。在法律背景下，‘人格’变得更加复杂。承认‘人格’赋予个人特定的权利，例如生命权、自由权和追求幸福的权利。然而，关于‘人格’何时开始的争论仍在继续。有些人认为它始于受精，而另一些人则认为它始于出生或在胎儿发育的某个阶段。这些不同的观点对堕胎和生育权等问题具有重要影响。此外，‘人格’的问题超越了人类。近年来，关于给予非人类实体（例如公司或高级人工智能）‘人格’的讨论逐渐增多。支持者认为，这些实体应该拥有类似于个体的权利和责任。然而，批评者警告说，以这种方式扩展‘人格’可能会稀释作为一个人的含义，并削弱人权。‘人格’的影响深远且广泛。它塑造了我们的伦理框架并影响我们的法律。例如，如果我们承认某些动物拥有‘人格’，我们可能会被迫改变对待它们的方式，从而导致更严格的动物福利法律。同样，在法律背景下重新定义‘人格’可能会影响我们如何处理移民、医疗保健和社会正义等问题。总之，‘人格’是一个多面的概念，在塑造我们对身份、权利和道德义务的理解中发挥着关键作用。随着社会的不断发展，我们对‘人格’的解释也将不断演变。参与这些讨论至关重要，因为它们不仅反映了我们的价值观，还影响着在快速变化的世界中人权和伦理考虑的未来轨迹。