denial of opinion report

简明释义

意见拒绝报告书

英英释义

例句

1.In our last meeting, we discussed the implications of a denial of opinion report on investor confidence.

在我们上次会议中，我们讨论了否定意见报告对投资者信心的影响。

2.The auditor issued a denial of opinion report after finding significant discrepancies in the financial statements.

审计师在发现财务报表中存在重大差异后，发布了否定意见报告。

3.The board decided to address the issues raised in the denial of opinion report immediately.

董事会决定立即解决否定意见报告中提出的问题。

4.A denial of opinion report indicates that the auditor could not obtain sufficient evidence to support their opinion.

一份否定意见报告表明审计师无法获得足够的证据来支持他们的意见。

5.Receiving a denial of opinion report can severely impact a company's reputation.

收到否定意见报告可能会严重影响公司的声誉。

作文

Denial of opinion report is a term that often arises in discussions related to legal and ethical standards in various fields, particularly in journalism, research, and corporate governance. Understanding this phrase is crucial for anyone involved in these areas, as it addresses the importance of transparency and accountability in reporting. A denial of opinion report refers to a document or statement that explicitly refutes or contradicts previously expressed opinions or conclusions. This can occur in several contexts, such as when a researcher revises their findings after new evidence comes to light, or when a journalist publishes a follow-up piece that challenges earlier assertions made in their articles.In the realm of journalism, the concept of a denial of opinion report plays a significant role in maintaining credibility. Journalists are expected to uphold the truth and provide accurate information to the public. If new facts emerge that challenge the validity of previous reports, it is imperative for journalists to issue a denial of opinion report. This not only helps to correct the record but also reinforces the journalist's commitment to ethical standards. For instance, if a news outlet initially reported on a political event based on certain sources, and later discovered that those sources were unreliable, a follow-up report denying the previous claims would be essential.In academic research, a denial of opinion report can serve a similar purpose. Researchers often publish their findings in peer-reviewed journals, and the scientific community relies on these publications for accurate information. If subsequent studies reveal flaws in the original research or provide contradictory evidence, the original researchers may need to issue a denial of opinion report. This action not only preserves the integrity of the scientific process but also ensures that other researchers and the public are not misled by outdated or inaccurate information.Moreover, in corporate governance, a denial of opinion report can be critical in managing public relations and maintaining stakeholder trust. Companies may face scrutiny regarding their practices, and if they previously issued statements that are later proven to be misleading or incorrect, a formal denial may be necessary. For example, if a corporation claimed that its product was environmentally friendly, but later evidence suggests otherwise, issuing a denial of opinion report can help mitigate backlash and demonstrate accountability to consumers and investors.The necessity of a denial of opinion report highlights the dynamic nature of information and the responsibility of individuals and organizations to adapt to new knowledge. It emphasizes the idea that opinions and conclusions should not be static but rather subject to revision in light of new evidence. This adaptability is a cornerstone of ethical practice in journalism, research, and corporate governance.In conclusion, the term denial of opinion report encapsulates a vital principle across various fields: the commitment to truth and the willingness to correct oneself when new information emerges. Whether in journalism, academia, or business, acknowledging and addressing inaccuracies through a denial of opinion report fosters trust and upholds the integrity of the respective professions. As we navigate an increasingly complex information landscape, understanding and embracing the concept of denial of opinion report will become ever more important for maintaining credibility and accountability in all forms of communication.

否认意见报告 是一个常在与法律和伦理标准相关的讨论中出现的术语，尤其是在新闻、研究和企业治理等领域。理解这个短语对于任何参与这些领域的人来说都是至关重要的，因为它涉及到报告的透明度和问责制的重要性。否认意见报告 指的是一个明确反驳或矛盾于先前表达的意见或结论的文件或声明。这种情况可以发生在多个背景下，例如，当研究人员在新证据出现后修正他们的发现，或者当记者发表一篇后续文章挑战他们早期文章中的主张时。在新闻界，否认意见报告 的概念在保持可信度方面发挥着重要作用。记者被期望维护真相并向公众提供准确的信息。如果有新的事实出现，挑战先前报道的有效性，记者发布一份否认意见报告 是至关重要的。这不仅有助于纠正记录，还增强了记者对伦理标准的承诺。例如，如果一家新闻机构基于某些来源最初报道了一次政治事件，后来发现这些来源不可靠，那么否认先前主张的后续报道将是必要的。在学术研究中，否认意见报告 可以发挥类似的作用。研究人员通常在同行评审的期刊上发表他们的发现，科学界依赖这些出版物获取准确的信息。如果后续研究揭示了原始研究中的缺陷或提供了相反的证据，原始研究人员可能需要发布一份否认意见报告。这一行动不仅维护了科学过程的完整性，还确保其他研究人员和公众不会被过时或不准确的信息误导。此外，在企业治理中，否认意见报告 在管理公共关系和维护利益相关者信任方面可能至关重要。公司可能会面临对其做法的审查，如果他们之前发布的声明后来被证明是误导性或不正确的，那么正式的否认可能是必要的。例如，如果一家公司声称其产品是环保的，但后来的证据表明情况并非如此，发布一份否认意见报告 可以帮助减轻反感，并向消费者和投资者展示问责制。否认意见报告 的必要性突显了信息的动态性质以及个人和组织根据新知识适应的责任。它强调了意见和结论不应是静态的，而应在新证据的基础上进行修订的理念。这种适应性是新闻、研究和企业治理中伦理实践的基石。总之，否认意见报告 这一术语概括了各个领域的一个重要原则：对真相的承诺以及在新信息出现时愿意纠正自己的态度。无论是在新闻、学术还是商业领域，通过否认意见报告 认识和解决不准确性，有助于建立信任并维护各自职业的诚信。在我们导航日益复杂的信息环境时，理解和接受否认意见报告 的概念对于维护所有沟通形式的可信度和问责制将变得越来越重要。