licencee estoppel

简明释义

许可证接受方不得推翻原议

英英释义

例句

1.In a trademark dispute, the judge invoked licencee estoppel to prevent the licensee from challenging the validity of the mark.

在商标争议中，法官引用了许可人禁止反悔原则，以阻止许可方质疑商标的有效性。

2.The plaintiff argued that the defendant's reliance on licencee estoppel was misplaced given the circumstances.

原告辩称，被告对许可人禁止反悔原则的依赖在这种情况下是不恰当的。

3.During negotiations, the parties acknowledged the implications of licencee estoppel in their agreement.

在谈判中，各方承认了他们协议中许可人禁止反悔原则的含义。

4.The court ruled that the defendant was bound by the principle of licencee estoppel because they had previously accepted the terms of the license.

法院裁定被告因先前接受了许可证的条款而受到许可人禁止反悔原则的约束。

5.The concept of licencee estoppel ensures that once a licensee has acted on a license, they cannot later deny its existence.

许可人禁止反悔原则确保一旦许可方根据许可证采取行动，他们不能再否认许可证的存在。

作文

In the realm of property law, the concept of licencee estoppel plays a crucial role in determining the rights and responsibilities of individuals who have been granted permission to use someone else's property. Essentially, licencee estoppel refers to a legal principle that prevents a licensor from denying the existence of a license once the licensee has relied on that license to their detriment. This principle serves to protect the interests of the licensee, ensuring that they are not unfairly disadvantaged after investing time, resources, or effort based on the assumption that they have legitimate access to the property in question.To better understand licencee estoppel, it is important to consider its application in real-world scenarios. For example, imagine a situation where a property owner allows a neighbor to use a portion of their land for gardening purposes. The neighbor, relying on this informal agreement, spends considerable time and money to cultivate the land. If the property owner later attempts to revoke this permission without notice, the neighbor may invoke licencee estoppel to argue that the owner cannot deny the existence of the license due to the neighbor's reliance on it. This principle is essential in preventing unjust enrichment and ensuring fairness in property use.Furthermore, the implications of licencee estoppel extend beyond mere property disputes. It also intersects with issues of equity and justice. In many cases, the courts will assess whether the licensee acted in good faith and whether their reliance on the license was reasonable. If it is determined that the licensee made substantial investments based on the belief that they had a valid license, the court may enforce the license despite the licensor's attempts to withdraw it. This reinforces the idea that individuals should be held accountable for their representations and commitments, particularly when those representations have led others to take significant actions.In addition to protecting licensees, licencee estoppel also serves as a reminder for licensors to be clear and consistent in their communications regarding property use. Ambiguities or changes in permission can lead to disputes that could have been avoided with clearer agreements. Therefore, it is advisable for property owners to formalize any licenses they grant, ensuring that all parties have a mutual understanding of the terms and conditions involved.In conclusion, licencee estoppel is a vital legal doctrine that upholds the integrity of agreements related to property use. By preventing licensors from retracting permissions that licensees have relied upon, it fosters an environment of trust and accountability. As society continues to navigate complex property relationships, understanding the nuances of licencee estoppel becomes increasingly important for both property owners and users alike. The principles of fairness, reliance, and protection of legitimate expectations are foundational to maintaining harmony in property law and ensuring that individuals can confidently engage in agreements without fear of arbitrary revocation.

在财产法领域，licencee estoppel的概念在确定被授予使用他人财产的个人的权利和责任方面发挥着至关重要的作用。基本上，licencee estoppel指的是一种法律原则，防止许可人否认许可证的存在，一旦被许可人依赖该许可证而受到损害。该原则旨在保护被许可人的利益，确保他们在基于对合法访问相关财产的假设而投入时间、资源或努力后，不会受到不公平的损害。为了更好地理解licencee estoppel，重要的是考虑其在现实场景中的应用。例如，想象一个情况，其中一位物业所有者允许邻居在其土地的一部分上进行园艺活动。邻居依赖这一非正式协议，花费了大量时间和金钱来耕作这块土地。如果物业所有者后来试图在没有通知的情况下撤回这一许可，邻居可以援引licencee estoppel来主张，所有者不能否认许可证的存在，因为邻居对此产生了依赖。该原则对于防止不当得利和确保财产使用的公平性至关重要。此外，licencee estoppel的影响不仅限于财产争议。它还与公平和正义问题交织在一起。在许多情况下，法院将评估被许可人是否以善意行事，以及他们对许可证的依赖是否合理。如果确定被许可人基于他们拥有有效许可证的信念进行了重大投资，法院可能会强制执行该许可证，尽管许可人试图撤回。这强化了一个观点，即个人应对他们的陈述和承诺负责，特别是在这些陈述导致他人采取重大行动的情况下。除了保护被许可人外，licencee estoppel还提醒许可人在财产使用方面保持清晰和一致的沟通。模糊或权限的变化可能导致本可以通过更清晰的协议避免的争议。因此，建议物业所有者正式化他们授予的任何许可证，确保所有各方对涉及的条款和条件有共同的理解。总之，licencee estoppel是维护与财产使用相关的协议完整性的一个重要法律原则。通过防止许可人撤回被许可人所依赖的权限，它促进了信任和问责的环境。随着社会继续应对复杂的财产关系，理解licencee estoppel的细微差别对于物业所有者和用户来说变得愈发重要。公平、依赖和保护合法期望的原则是维护财产法和确保个人能够自信地参与协议而不必担心随意撤销的基础。